Bitcoin Forum
May 13, 2024, 12:11:19 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: new bitcoin 3.24rc2 missing fields from getinfo  (Read 1225 times)
sergio (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 313
Merit: 258


View Profile WWW
July 21, 2011, 09:38:12 AM
 #1

Why does the newer version of bitcoin 3.24rc2 has missing fields when using getinfo to get the information, it does not show the version number, paytxfee, and other fields, here is the comparison:

I recently installed, that why the block number is low:

./bitcoin getinfo
{
    "balance" : 0.000000000000000,
    "blocks" : 501,
    "connections" : 1005,
    "proxy" : "",
    "generate" : false,
    "genproclimit" : -1,
    "difficulty" : 1.000000000000000
}
Is this an strip down version, or was paytxfee removed, how about the other missing fields?

What I did notice on the newer version, is that the number of connections is very high, I never got that many connections with the older version, the difference in number of connections is huge.
But the number of blocks seems to be stuck at 501 it has been  several minutes and no change, also the new version is using lots of CPU even though I am not mining is this normal?

and the older version 3.22
./bitcoind getinfo
{
    "version" : 32200,
    "balance" : 0.00000000,
    "blocks" : 127364,
    "connections" : 0,
    "proxy" : "",
    "generate" : false,
    "genproclimit" : -1,
    "difficulty" : 434882.72174970,
    "hashespersec" : 0,
    "testnet" : false,
    "keypoololdest" : 1306594459,
    "paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
    "errors" : ""
}

Once a transaction has 6 confirmations, it is extremely unlikely that an attacker without at least 50% of the network's computation power would be able to reverse it.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715602279
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715602279

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715602279
Reply with quote  #2

1715602279
Report to moderator
sergio (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 313
Merit: 258


View Profile WWW
July 21, 2011, 09:41:13 AM
 #2

sorry, disregard the previous post, it is late night, and I confused the version I had recently compiled, with another I had in the same directory.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!