Bitcoin Forum
April 26, 2018, 06:02:47 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.16.0  [Torrent]. (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Why are 7950s better than 7970s?  (Read 868 times)
timk225
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 964
Merit: 1000


View Profile
October 10, 2013, 03:26:46 PM
 #1

Why are 7950s better than 7970s?  From all my research, a 7950 is created when the cpu and other parts of a 7970 have flaws in manufacturing, so the gpu maker just disables that part and calls it a 7950 instead, with the needed BIOS changes. 

But what is it about 7970s that make them worse at mining?  I have a 7970 that has been pushed to 665 Khash in mining LTC, but the temperature was touching 90C.  I have 3 HIS Ice-Q 7950s that hum along nicely at 630 Khash and 75-80C, and they could probably be pushed to the same 665 or very nearly so if I tried.

Even though my 7970 touched 665, it is usually running around 500-600 by having the intensity cut back, because I don't want to leave the A/C running all day to cool the room off.  It gets hot if I don't.

1524722567
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1524722567

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1524722567
Reply with quote  #2

1524722567
Report to moderator
1524722567
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1524722567

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1524722567
Reply with quote  #2

1524722567
Report to moderator
1524722567
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1524722567

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1524722567
Reply with quote  #2

1524722567
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
fattypig
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100



View Profile WWW
October 10, 2013, 03:41:37 PM
 #2

Why are 7950s better than 7970s?  From all my research, a 7950 is created when the cpu and other parts of a 7970 have flaws in manufacturing, so the gpu maker just disables that part and calls it a 7950 instead, with the needed BIOS changes.  

But what is it about 7970s that make them worse at mining?  I have a 7970 that has been pushed to 665 Khash in mining LTC, but the temperature was touching 90C.  I have 3 HIS Ice-Q 7950s that hum along nicely at 630 Khash and 75-80C, and they could probably be pushed to the same 665 or very nearly so if I tried.

Even though my 7970 touched 665, it is usually running around 500-600 by having the intensity cut back, because I don't want to leave the A/C running all day to cool the room off.  It gets hot if I don't.



1) You should undervolt your gpu before it burns.

2) Try and get a better setting for your HD 7970 as you should be getting 700-800 overclocked.

3) HD 7950 is better in term of hash/energy.

Smiley



Wipeout2097
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 250


BLOCKCHAIN VERIFIED PRODUCT REVIEWS PLATFORM


View Profile
October 10, 2013, 08:18:47 PM
 #3

They are "better" because they provide higher Mh/$. The rest is configurable (clock speed, voltage, power consumption, heat, noise), even in the worst case of needing to hex edit and flash a bios.

█████
▄▄▄
███
███
▀▀▀
███
███
███
▀▀▀
█████
█████
▄▄▄▄▄
█████
█████
▀▀▀▀▀
█████
█████
█████
▀▀▀▀▀
█████
█████
▄▄▄
███
███
▀▀▀
███
███
███
▀▀▀
█████
█████
▄▄▄▄▄
█████
█████
▀▀▀▀▀
█████
█████
█████
▀▀▀▀▀
█████
vindimy
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 239
Merit: 100



View Profile
October 10, 2013, 11:26:30 PM
 #4

In my opinion the $100 difference between 7950 and 7970 makes 7950 a very clear winner. I've been mining BTC and LTC on both and I wish I've never spent money on 7970.

cowandtea
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250


View Profile
October 11, 2013, 04:10:40 AM
 #5

I believe 7950 is better because of price/hash. But price/kwh, I still think 7970 is better if you configure it right.

Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!