[ANN] Decentralized Machine Learning

[redlay]

If this project is for github, can we say that it will be an open source project?

Of course. This is even written in whitepaper.

Hmm... 
And what is it for? Well, that is an open source project. And the project is of such high complexity. Why did they choose this option?

Because the team wants to attract as many users as possible to audit its platform, as well as implement various improvements and changes.

[deuteronpsi]

If this project is for github, can we say that it will be an open source project?

Of course. This is even written in whitepaper.

Hmm... 
And what is it for? Well, that is an open source project. And the project is of such high complexity. Why did they choose this option?

Because the team wants to attract as many users as possible to audit its platform, as well as implement various improvements and changes.

But is this not going to affect the overall stability of the system? I mean changes. which will be made by users who do not have sufficient knowledge in this area. Will not this damage the overall stability of the system?

[redlay]

If this project is for github, can we say that it will be an open source project?

Of course. This is even written in whitepaper.

Hmm... 
And what is it for? Well, that is an open source project. And the project is of such high complexity. Why did they choose this option?

Because the team wants to attract as many users as possible to audit its platform, as well as implement various improvements and changes.

But is this not going to affect the overall stability of the system? I mean changes. which will be made by users who do not have sufficient knowledge in this area. Will not this damage the overall stability of the system?

Actually it does not work that way. You understand, after every change you make it is separated into a separate branch for development. These are the features of the work of such repositories as github. So on the stability of the system this will not have any effect.

[ModusPwnd]

It is striking how quickly information technology is developing. What seemed impossible yesterday is now being translated into reality.

[deuteronpsi]

If this project is for github, can we say that it will be an open source project?

Of course. This is even written in whitepaper.

Hmm... 
And what is it for? Well, that is an open source project. And the project is of such high complexity. Why did they choose this option?

Because the team wants to attract as many users as possible to audit its platform, as well as implement various improvements and changes.

But is this not going to affect the overall stability of the system? I mean changes. which will be made by users who do not have sufficient knowledge in this area. Will not this damage the overall stability of the system?

Actually it does not work that way. You understand, after every change you make it is separated into a separate branch for development. These are the features of the work of such repositories as github. So on the stability of the system this will not have any effect.

In this case, I fully support such a decision. Some users really can greatly improve this product I believe.

[CravenEconomics]

It is striking how quickly information technology is developing. What seemed impossible yesterday is now being translated into reality.

Blockchain should become a fundamental technology of the 21st century. I do not understand why it is still so little in demand among people and is almost never used globally.

[redlay]

If this project is for github, can we say that it will be an open source project?

Of course. This is even written in whitepaper.

Hmm... 
And what is it for? Well, that is an open source project. And the project is of such high complexity. Why did they choose this option?

Because the team wants to attract as many users as possible to audit its platform, as well as implement various improvements and changes.

But is this not going to affect the overall stability of the system? I mean changes. which will be made by users who do not have sufficient knowledge in this area. Will not this damage the overall stability of the system?

Actually it does not work that way. You understand, after every change you make it is separated into a separate branch for development. These are the features of the work of such repositories as github. So on the stability of the system this will not have any effect.

In this case, I fully support such a decision. Some users really can greatly improve this product I believe.

I hope that this will also be encouraged by the system in the form of additional tokens, as far as I know, so it will be.

[ModusPwnd]

It is striking how quickly information technology is developing. What seemed impossible yesterday is now being translated into reality.

Blockchain should become a fundamental technology of the 21st century. I do not understand why it is still so little in demand among people and is almost never used globally.

It's really cool to come up with such an interesting concept of machine learning on blockchain.

[deuteronpsi]

If this project is for github, can we say that it will be an open source project?

Of course. This is even written in whitepaper.

Hmm... 
And what is it for? Well, that is an open source project. And the project is of such high complexity. Why did they choose this option?

Because the team wants to attract as many users as possible to audit its platform, as well as implement various improvements and changes.

But is this not going to affect the overall stability of the system? I mean changes. which will be made by users who do not have sufficient knowledge in this area. Will not this damage the overall stability of the system?

Actually it does not work that way. You understand, after every change you make it is separated into a separate branch for development. These are the features of the work of such repositories as github. So on the stability of the system this will not have any effect.

In this case, I fully support such a decision. Some users really can greatly improve this product I believe.

I hope that this will also be encouraged by the system in the form of additional tokens, as far as I know, so it will be.

By the way, I did not think about it at once. Yes, such work should be encouraged, otherwise what's the point of doing this. For the sake of enthusiasm? Somehow it looks dubious. So the promotion in the form of tokens looks very nice!

[redlay]

If this project is for github, can we say that it will be an open source project?

Of course. This is even written in whitepaper.

Hmm... 
And what is it for? Well, that is an open source project. And the project is of such high complexity. Why did they choose this option?

Because the team wants to attract as many users as possible to audit its platform, as well as implement various improvements and changes.

But is this not going to affect the overall stability of the system? I mean changes. which will be made by users who do not have sufficient knowledge in this area. Will not this damage the overall stability of the system?

Actually it does not work that way. You understand, after every change you make it is separated into a separate branch for development. These are the features of the work of such repositories as github. So on the stability of the system this will not have any effect.

In this case, I fully support such a decision. Some users really can greatly improve this product I believe.

I hope that this will also be encouraged by the system in the form of additional tokens, as far as I know, so it will be.

By the way, I did not think about it at once. Yes, such work should be encouraged, otherwise what's the point of doing this. For the sake of enthusiasm? Somehow it looks dubious. So the promotion in the form of tokens looks very nice!

Yes, I totally agree, it remains only to find out exactly what amounts of promotion can be discussed 

[yuansuyi]

This is a topic and field that will play an important part in the future. Everybody is talking about machine learning nowadays. It is easier said than done though. I will watch the project closely.

[CravenEconomics]

It is striking how quickly information technology is developing. What seemed impossible yesterday is now being translated into reality.

Blockchain should become a fundamental technology of the 21st century. I do not understand why it is still so little in demand among people and is almost never used globally.

It's really cool to come up with such an interesting concept of machine learning on blockchain.

Developers look far ahead and realize that sooner or later centralized capacity systems will lack, centralized machine learning centers have a certain ceiling

[ModusPwnd]

It is striking how quickly information technology is developing. What seemed impossible yesterday is now being translated into reality.

Blockchain should become a fundamental technology of the 21st century. I do not understand why it is still so little in demand among people and is almost never used globally.

It's really cool to come up with such an interesting concept of machine learning on blockchain.

Developers look far ahead and realize that sooner or later centralized capacity systems will lack, centralized machine learning centers have a certain ceiling

And this project involves an endless supply of computing power ?

[CravenEconomics]

It is striking how quickly information technology is developing. What seemed impossible yesterday is now being translated into reality.

Blockchain should become a fundamental technology of the 21st century. I do not understand why it is still so little in demand among people and is almost never used globally.

It's really cool to come up with such an interesting concept of machine learning on blockchain.

Developers look far ahead and realize that sooner or later centralized capacity systems will lack, centralized machine learning centers have a certain ceiling

And this project involves an endless supply of computing power ?

In theory, yes. Developers bet on devices of people, laptops, tablets, phones, computers. The number of these devices is huge and every year the number of devices will grow. Therefore, we can conclude that the growth potential for project infinite, well, or at least definitely much more than centralized systems

[ModusPwnd]

It is striking how quickly information technology is developing. What seemed impossible yesterday is now being translated into reality.

Blockchain should become a fundamental technology of the 21st century. I do not understand why it is still so little in demand among people and is almost never used globally.

It's really cool to come up with such an interesting concept of machine learning on blockchain.

Developers look far ahead and realize that sooner or later centralized capacity systems will lack, centralized machine learning centers have a certain ceiling

And this project involves an endless supply of computing power ?

In theory, yes. Developers bet on devices of people, laptops, tablets, phones, computers. The number of these devices is huge and every year the number of devices will grow. Therefore, we can conclude that the growth potential for project infinite, well, or at least definitely much more than centralized systems

It is necessary to understand that all devices will not be involved in the work of the platform is certainly and first of all you need to start from how many people will provide their unused capacity

[CravenEconomics]

It is striking how quickly information technology is developing. What seemed impossible yesterday is now being translated into reality.

Blockchain should become a fundamental technology of the 21st century. I do not understand why it is still so little in demand among people and is almost never used globally.

It's really cool to come up with such an interesting concept of machine learning on blockchain.

Developers look far ahead and realize that sooner or later centralized capacity systems will lack, centralized machine learning centers have a certain ceiling

And this project involves an endless supply of computing power ?

In theory, yes. Developers bet on devices of people, laptops, tablets, phones, computers. The number of these devices is huge and every year the number of devices will grow. Therefore, we can conclude that the growth potential for project infinite, well, or at least definitely much more than centralized systems

It is necessary to understand that all devices will not be involved in the work of the platform is certainly and first of all you need to start from how many people will provide their unused capacity

You are absolutely right, the number of users will grow immensely from day to day after the launch of the platform. After a while, the platform will have enough power and personal annihilation to start working with algorithms

[ModusPwnd]

It is striking how quickly information technology is developing. What seemed impossible yesterday is now being translated into reality.

Blockchain should become a fundamental technology of the 21st century. I do not understand why it is still so little in demand among people and is almost never used globally.

It's really cool to come up with such an interesting concept of machine learning on blockchain.

Developers look far ahead and realize that sooner or later centralized capacity systems will lack, centralized machine learning centers have a certain ceiling

And this project involves an endless supply of computing power ?

In theory, yes. Developers bet on devices of people, laptops, tablets, phones, computers. The number of these devices is huge and every year the number of devices will grow. Therefore, we can conclude that the growth potential for project infinite, well, or at least definitely much more than centralized systems

It is necessary to understand that all devices will not be involved in the work of the platform is certainly and first of all you need to start from how many people will provide their unused capacity

You are absolutely right, the number of users will grow immensely from day to day after the launch of the platform. After a while, the platform will have enough power and personal annihilation to start working with algorithms

Of course, I have no doubt that the project will be in demand, we just talked about the potential and prospects for the development of machine learning in general. And from your messages, I can conclude that this platform will compete well with modern centralized machine learning centers

[Seidr]

I can not find, I did not save it, apparently on the Internet it is very difficult to find it at the moment, since there is already a lot of information

It's very bad, if someone can share this article, write to me in private messages please! It is very important for me!

I think that someone will be there and you will be able to get acquainted with this article. I'm not the only one who could read, the article was available to everyone at that moment

Thank you very much, I will continue to seek information, you have greatly helped me, I appreciate it.

[DarkPunk]

Many companies are interested in new algorithms for their systems, this industry has recently begun to gain momentum.  I think in 5-10 years this will be one of the fundamental fields of development, technical progress

[Seidr]

Do you think the project will be successful among other projects? Very much a big moment at the moment. It's very difficult I think