Big budget versus Great idea. Who eventually wins?

[kingcrypto-the2nd]

ideas rule the world

[lambo_driver]

If you have a lot of money, you can buy a good idea from someone who does not have money

[amfox]

Hello, I think it's the other way around, if the idea is bad - the project have no future, but idea could so good that you don't need a lot of investment from the start.

[explosion]

In the modern world reality I vote for a big money. From the ICOs experience I can also judge that if you have money you can make every idea look good and make people believe this will change some sphere of the world. ANd don't forget about hype. This is what leads the ICO market. The more money you have, the more hype you can create.

[katixrecamara]

In the long run, I think the project with low budget and great idea will gain an eventual greater success. Simply because a great idea will attract potential investors and therefore more community support. Another is it started will low budget, thus, will grow into something big with more percentage of net income.

[kryptogunner]

for a short term, big budget shall win but in longer horizon a great idea with a honest efforts from the team behind is bound to win. This is what value investing is. A raw unpolished diamond lying un noticed with coal. Someday its worth will certainly be high. But honest efforts is imp here.

[elsie34]

In the long run, I think the project with low budget and great idea will gain an eventual greater success. Simply because a great idea will attract potential investors and therefore more community support. Another is it started will low budget, thus, will grow into something big with more percentage of net income.

how can they grow if people wont find them? People wont find them because they are lacking of advertising exposure because they are low in budget. therfore i  guess  big budget will still be a winner on this contest. They can still improve their project after people recognizes them. that is why they have still a chance to become the best. i often see ico's with great projetc but with a verry poor publication because lacking of funds and they were getting left behind.

[EastSound]

great idea is better than big budget for me. when you got a great idea, many investors would be crazy about investing in that idea, from there, you'll get a big budget to make that idea into the real world. rather than having a huge budget but you know what you'll do with that budget.

[lambo_driver]

sounds  cool does not it? 

[lambo_driver]

Money rules people)

[asus09]

Hello people,

So my question is: why a project with a mediocre idea but with a bigger budget is likely to have more successful future than the project with a great idea but with a low budget?

How do you see this?

I think it's not that simple. every company that is building the project of course has a way and structure important to be run as planned.
success is determined by many factors, the management team and the advisor are an important part. and we as people who campaign. so it's not as simple as what you say.

[Agaton]

Big budget and great idea are both totally good, for instance, if a certain person have a big budget but there is no idea on how to used their budgets for life development, so it's quite useless. And for the people who have a great idea but there is no budget or no money at all, so their great idea would also a useless. So, it is better to have a big budget and having great idea.

[lambo_driver]

It seems that no one can object to this

[BitcoinBallerina]

In crypto markets the idea matters but the budget not so much. With good product the money will eventually flow. Look at Nano for example started out with a very small team of devs and budget, but look at its community now.

[Panteleymon]

A large budget is a big advantage. Like the idea, too. If you can manage your advantages, you can achieve great results even with limited other possibilities. A correctly presented idea can be successful without a large budget, if you take advantage. Just like the budget without a special idea (a successful advertisement of something ordinary). Ideally, there should be both, but these benefits can also be lost if you use them ineptly.
It seems to me that in the question itself there are equivalent concepts. Rather, the question should be put in a different way. How not to trust all those who can not dispose of the benefits.

[lambo_driver]

when you have a lot of money at once there is free time because you do not think where to get them) and focus on the brainstorm

[s4mp1nt0]

Hello people,

So my question is: why a project with a mediocre idea but with a bigger budget is likely to have more successful future than the project with a great idea but with a low budget?

How do you see this?

ofcourse big budget always win this. If you have a budget then you can arrange team with a great idea and join conference to get some more.
you don't achieve anything if you only have idea but no money to implement it.

[CryptoAlphaStar]

A good balance between budget and a good idea. But if you have to choose one, I would choose a good idea. Ideas bring money naturally if they are good.

[vasil777]

Hello people,

So my question is: why a project with a mediocre idea but with a bigger budget is likely to have more successful future than the project with a great idea but with a low budget?

How do you see this?

I think the most important thing in each project is the idea. because if there is no interesting idea then nobody will invest in the project. Also, not always a company that has accumulated a lot of money can not succeed in the future

[wireless474]

Hello people,

So my question is: why a project with a mediocre idea but with a bigger budget is likely to have more successful future than the project with a great idea but with a low budget?

Well, to simply answer this... you have to have money to make money... however, i dont think that all companies with a big budget makes it in the long run.

How do you see this?