[CLOSED]: unnamed coin

[dspencer]

Interesting project, let's see how it goes.

[hash4value]

Updating wallet on Hash4Value.pw

[hash4value]

Buzaath, we updated wallet to a new one but sunc is stuck at 4363 block. It donloads no more blocks. But when pool tries to run 'getblocktemplate' it says
'error -10: bitcoin is downloading blocks...'

What is wrong?

[hash4value]

Wallet updated to ones with faster difficulty calculation
Miners are welcome to:

BCBC IS AVAILABLE ON
HASH4VALUE MINING POOL

http://hash4value.pw

Based on Yiimp pool (No Registration Needed)
Payout every 2 hours for balances starting from  : 0.01 BCBC
Fee  : 0.5% Only (Lowest Fee)

Code:

-a sha256 -o stratum+tcp://hash4value.pw:3333 -u <WALLET_ADDRESS> -p c=BCBC

Discord

[skybot13x]

I can watch snapshot was taken using data of blocks on 11th December 2017 is that mean everyone having Bitcoins on that specific time automatically becomes eligible for forked coins ? Why for snapshot data of three months was used without prior announcement or there was some pre-announement before and I don't know.

No, there was no pre-announcement, we wanted to make a surprise. And we waited for a long time with the announcement, waited for market to stabilize.
But did not wait 

This is quite weird. People know what they have in their wallet NOW, because they can check. But how would someone know which of their BTC addresses were containing BTC three months earlier? This difficulty will surely not help adoption.
However, I must say that the idea of removing Satoshi's coins in quite funny, I'va too always thought at that Sword of Damocles as a major problem nobody want to see.

It's debatable of course that Satoshi owns so many Bitcoins, but are you sure that no large organization owns close to as many Bitcoins as Satoshi? We can't know and I think there is a possibility that concentration of ownership in Bitcoin is already high regardless of Satoshi's coins.

But everyone knows about Satoshi and monitoring the movements of his funds.

Sure, you can monitor the funds and see when they move. What do you think will happen when he moves 500,000 Bitcoin? What if Bitcoin is worth 10 trillion dollars in the future and Satoshi moves 500,000 Bitcoin? There are definitely some problems with that because literally anyone could be Satoshi and we don't know whether it might be very bad that one person or organization owns so much of a potential global currency.

[sawsaw987jig]

could you give me the link of whitepaper ?

[flysohigh.noshy]

when it start?

[btw50]

the vicex exchange might list us in a few days >  Graf Kot II, [08.04.18 10:59]
i think few days

[farsky]

"interesting" fork.
The announcement was made on March 12, 2018, and the snapshot was made on December 11, 2017.
Nobody is embarrassed by such a big difference in dates?
but how much is not 2016 or 2013? Or maybe 2010? (sarcasm)
I think all this is very suspicious.

[btw50]

were you able to come up with masternode for this

the world first bitcoin fork with masternode > it would be something and it worth a lot  
with 5 or 10k collateral for each MN soon each one will value at 50k and it earn passive income

https://graviex.net/ exchange required to pay them only 2 MN to get it list there.

[duyhenry]

Yes!!! I'm will good it

[btw50]

this is from vicex >  at the moment we are testing everything for fault tolerance, please be patient,

 soon everything will be. I think by the end of this week you can already trade with us.

[btw50]

good new everyone, 

billybonus2 is from vicex posting the same message in other 2 ANN we apply for.

so that mean they are going to open their exchange in a few days, by the weekend.

Bravo everyone it is the first and the biggest step moving foward.

the journey will be long and a bit of cold.

[btw50]

in order to create demand, Dev might have to update the roadmap what

your planning in our ANN when they first open for trading by this weekend

i forgot to tell you, you might need to open that telegram and invite everyone

or maybe discord is better, discord is good for future because it got some function to layout

[glennoir]

Guys, let's try to add BCBC on southXchange

Every Wednesday we pick the top 3 most voted coins. To vote please send Bitcoins to the vote address. 1 vote = 0.001 BTC. Minimum 500 votes required to be considered. Votes are cumulative from week to week.

We would need 500 members who are each willing to pay $7 (in BTC equivalent) to vote for BCBC. We need to reach a new level!

[glennoir]

Bitcoin@CBC is in the voting list:
https://www.southxchange.com/Home/Vote
I sent some BTC and my vote was counted!

[skybot13x]

I can watch snapshot was taken using data of blocks on 11th December 2017 is that mean everyone having Bitcoins on that specific time automatically becomes eligible for forked coins ? Why for snapshot data of three months was used without prior announcement or there was some pre-announement before and I don't know.

No, there was no pre-announcement, we wanted to make a surprise. And we waited for a long time with the announcement, waited for market to stabilize.
But did not wait 

This is quite weird. People know what they have in their wallet NOW, because they can check. But how would someone know which of their BTC addresses were containing BTC three months earlier? This difficulty will surely not help adoption.
However, I must say that the idea of removing Satoshi's coins in quite funny, I'va too always thought at that Sword of Damocles as a major problem nobody want to see.

It's debatable of course that Satoshi owns so many Bitcoins, but are you sure that no large organization owns close to as many Bitcoins as Satoshi? We can't know and I think there is a possibility that concentration of ownership in Bitcoin is already high regardless of Satoshi's coins.

But everyone knows about Satoshi and monitoring the movements of his funds.

Sure, you can monitor the funds and see when they move. What do you think will happen when he moves 500,000 Bitcoin? What if Bitcoin is worth 10 trillion dollars in the future and Satoshi moves 500,000 Bitcoin? There are definitely some problems with that because literally anyone could be Satoshi and we don't know whether it might be very bad that one person or organization owns so much of a potential global currency.

I think that there will be an unprecedented collapse of Bitcoin prices, this is a psychological problem, but as the price increases Satoshi's personality will become more and more important, maybe he will be the first trillionaire (even potential or virtual). So there will be a big difference between whether someone will move their 500k or whether Satoshi himself will do it.

I know this is an old story but I want to bring it up again. It is not only that someone moves 500,000 Bitcoin, it is also important who the person is that moves 500,000 Bitcoin. If it is Bill Gates, people might calm down. What if it's some crazy politician like the boss from Korea? That would be Bitcoin's death.

[kurbeks]

How it would be death? It would be big dump and for plp opourtunity to buy cheepies. And he wouldn't be able to cash out money eitherway.

[glennoir]

I saw the bounty thread of your project but I can’t find the link to the white papper. Can you give me the link of the white paper? I need to read through the white paper to understand the project clearly

Where did you find info about the bounty of this project? Can you send me a link to the thread so I can have a look?

[btw50]

Bounty, whitepaper and other goodies are expected in our new project which will be pre-announced in the coming days!

do you ready to announce ?