Bitcoin Forum
May 11, 2024, 08:16:18 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Blockchain.info 650 Watts per gigahash - reasonable figure?  (Read 2617 times)
davidgdg (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 551
Merit: 501


View Profile
October 15, 2013, 11:11:11 AM
 #1

Blockchain.info has a stat for mining profitability based on electricity consumption of 650 watts per gigahash. This seems like a high figure to me in the age of ASICs. What would be a reasonable figure to use, based on ASIC machines currently in use? (as opposed to vapour-ware promised for next year).
 

"There is only one thing that is seriously morally wrong with the world, and that is politics. By 'politics' I mean all that, and only what, involves the State." Jan Lester "Escape from Leviathan"
It is a common myth that Bitcoin is ruled by a majority of miners. This is not true. Bitcoin miners "vote" on the ordering of transactions, but that's all they do. They can't vote to change the network rules.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715415378
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715415378

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715415378
Reply with quote  #2

1715415378
Report to moderator
1715415378
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715415378

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715415378
Reply with quote  #2

1715415378
Report to moderator
1715415378
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715415378

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715415378
Reply with quote  #2

1715415378
Report to moderator
os2sam
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3578
Merit: 1090


Think for yourself


View Profile
October 15, 2013, 11:26:33 AM
 #2

That must be a really old stat.  Block Erupters consume around 7.5 Watts per Ghs.

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
davidgdg (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 551
Merit: 501


View Profile
October 15, 2013, 12:28:11 PM
 #3

Thanks. Yes I saw that some of the 2014 ASICS are promising 0.6w / GHS. So blockchain.info are out by a factor of at least 100 and possibly a 1000.

"There is only one thing that is seriously morally wrong with the world, and that is politics. By 'politics' I mean all that, and only what, involves the State." Jan Lester "Escape from Leviathan"
polarhei
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 250


Firing it up


View Profile
October 18, 2013, 04:19:09 PM
 #4

the 650W based on general equipment. you know the rest.
erk
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 826
Merit: 500



View Profile
October 19, 2013, 12:31:10 AM
 #5

Blockchain.info has a stat for mining profitability based on electricity consumption of 650 watts per gigahash. This seems like a high figure to me in the age of ASICs. What would be a reasonable figure to use, based on ASIC machines currently in use? (as opposed to vapour-ware promised for next year).
 
I wrote to them complained about it a month ago. No reply. The figure is 6-8 mths out of date. The energy is down to a few percent of that. 650Watt is a GPU rig figure.

philipma1957
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4116
Merit: 7865


'The right to privacy matters'


View Profile WWW
October 19, 2013, 02:46:46 AM
 #6

Blockchain.info has a stat for mining profitability based on electricity consumption of 650 watts per gigahash. This seems like a high figure to me in the age of ASICs. What would be a reasonable figure to use, based on ASIC machines currently in use? (as opposed to vapour-ware promised for next year).
 
I wrote to them complained about it a month ago. No reply. The figure is 6-8 mths out of date. The energy is down to a few percent of that. 650Watt is a GPU rig figure.



Yeah even if some use gpus for heat you may have free electricity but not free heat so running a gpu would make sense in the winter.

   Most hashing is asic   the number should be under 20 watts

▄▄███████▄▄
▄██████████████▄
▄██████████████████▄
▄████▀▀▀▀███▀▀▀▀█████▄
▄█████████████▄█▀████▄
███████████▄███████████
██████████▄█▀███████████
██████████▀████████████
▀█████▄█▀█████████████▀
▀████▄▄▄▄███▄▄▄▄████▀
▀██████████████████▀
▀███████████████▀
▀▀███████▀▀
.
 MΞTAWIN  THE FIRST WEB3 CASINO   
.
.. PLAY NOW ..
TooDumbForBitcoin
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1638
Merit: 1001



View Profile
October 19, 2013, 03:35:11 PM
 #7

Quote
I wrote to them complained about it a month ago. No reply.

Same here. After a couple months I got a ticket # and request to resubmit my complaint.  Just wrote 'em another email.

I"m gonna PM organofcorti, the expert on these matters.



▄▄                                  ▄▄
 ███▄                            ▄███
  ██████                      ██████
   ███████                  ███████
    ███████                ███████
     ███████              ███████
      ███████            ███████
       ███████▄▄      ▄▄███████
        ██████████████████████
         ████████████████████
          ██████████████████
           ████████████████
            ██████████████
             ███████████
              █████████
               ███████
                █████
                 ██
                  █
veil|     PRIVACY    
     WITHOUT COMPROMISE.      
▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂
|   NO ICO. NO PREMINE. 
   X16RT GPU Mining. Fair distribution.  
|      The first Zerocoin-based Cryptocurrency      
   WITH ALWAYS-ON PRIVACY.  
|



                   ▄▄████
              ▄▄████████▌
         ▄▄█████████▀███
    ▄▄██████████▀▀ ▄███▌
▄████████████▀▀  ▄█████
▀▀▀███████▀   ▄███████▌
      ██    ▄█████████
       █  ▄██████████▌
       █  ███████████
       █ ██▀ ▀██████▌
       ██▀     ▀████
                 ▀█▌




   ▄███████
   ████████
   ███▀
   ███
██████████
██████████
   ███
   ███
   ███
   ███
   ███
   ███




     ▄▄█▀▀ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ▀▀█▄▄
   ▐██▄▄██████████████▄▄██▌
   ████████████████████████
  ▐████████████████████████▌
  ███████▀▀▀██████▀▀▀███████
 ▐██████     ████     ██████▌
 ███████     ████     ███████
▐████████▄▄▄██████▄▄▄████████▌
▐████████████████████████████▌
 █████▄▄▀▀▀▀██████▀▀▀▀▄▄█████
  ▀▀██████          ██████▀▀
      ▀▀▀            ▀▀▀
polarhei
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 250


Firing it up


View Profile
October 22, 2013, 06:04:16 PM
 #8

Blockchain.info has a stat for mining profitability based on electricity consumption of 650 watts per gigahash. This seems like a high figure to me in the age of ASICs. What would be a reasonable figure to use, based on ASIC machines currently in use? (as opposed to vapour-ware promised for next year).
 
I wrote to them complained about it a month ago. No reply. The figure is 6-8 mths out of date. The energy is down to a few percent of that. 650Watt is a GPU rig figure.



Yeah even if some use gpus for heat you may have free electricity but not free heat so running a gpu would make sense in the winter.

   Most hashing is asic   the number should be under 20 watts

The 650W is based on easily obtained. You know the scams on the forum, especially,the most imfamous butterfly. Before I do more seriously, I bought 7970 to test out. Even fail At last, can be for other usage such as drawing. The ASIC cannot suit for as if there was no alternative nor improved one, it is just waiting to be broken.
zvs
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1680
Merit: 1000


https://web.archive.org/web/*/nogleg.com


View Profile WWW
October 22, 2013, 10:36:03 PM
 #9

Blockchain.info has a stat for mining profitability based on electricity consumption of 650 watts per gigahash. This seems like a high figure to me in the age of ASICs. What would be a reasonable figure to use, based on ASIC machines currently in use? (as opposed to vapour-ware promised for next year).
 
I wrote to them complained about it a month ago. No reply. The figure is 6-8 mths out of date. The energy is down to a few percent of that. 650Watt is a GPU rig figure.



Yeah even if some use gpus for heat you may have free electricity but not free heat so running a gpu would make sense in the winter.

   Most hashing is asic   the number should be under 20 watts

The 650W is based on easily obtained. You know the scams on the forum, especially,the most imfamous butterfly. Before I do more seriously, I bought 7970 to test out. Even fail At last, can be for other usage such as drawing. The ASIC cannot suit for as if there was no alternative nor improved one, it is just waiting to be broken.

Don't even bother anymore, but, say, back in March or April, I'd look for cheap 7770+ on slickdeals and buy, do rebate, sell games... mined with them from about 2 weeks to 3 months (depending on when I bought it)...  but even now could sell them for about same value as they cost when bought new.   

eg; the two 7790's I got for around $75/ea after doing rebate + selling game/app they came with
sheebang
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 32
Merit: 0



View Profile
October 23, 2013, 06:29:36 PM
 #10

Blockchain.info has a stat for mining profitability based on electricity consumption of 650 watts per gigahash. This seems like a high figure to me in the age of ASICs. What would be a reasonable figure to use, based on ASIC machines currently in use? (as opposed to vapour-ware promised for next year).
 
I wrote to them complained about it a month ago. No reply. The figure is 6-8 mths out of date. The energy is down to a few percent of that. 650Watt is a GPU rig figure.



The 650 W is not the problem. What strikes me is that they know about the electricity costs of 200,000 miners. :-))))) Should be anything between 0 and 45$c.

Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!