Vod
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3878
Merit: 3163
Licking my boob since 1970
|
|
November 17, 2013, 10:52:12 PM |
|
As it stands, it's largely a judgement system.
One that works well. You scammed. People noticed. Now you can't scam again. Worked great for TradeFortress. Guess he won't scam anymore... Interesting point. If you could turn back time, how would you change the system so that wouldn't happen? I believe most of the people that left him positive feedback had traded with him already.
|
|
|
|
Lohoris (OP)
|
|
November 17, 2013, 10:54:01 PM |
|
Worked great for TradeFortress. Guess he won't scam anymore... Interesting point. If you could turn back time, how would you change the system so that wouldn't happen? I believe most of the people that left him positive feedback had traded with him already. I'd remove DefaultTrust?
|
|
|
|
Vod
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3878
Merit: 3163
Licking my boob since 1970
|
|
November 17, 2013, 11:07:08 PM |
|
Worked great for TradeFortress. Guess he won't scam anymore... Interesting point. If you could turn back time, how would you change the system so that wouldn't happen? I believe most of the people that left him positive feedback had traded with him already. I'd remove DefaultTrust? I understand where you are coming from, but I think the benefits far outweigh the negatives. Maybe limit DefaultTrust to those who have done a lot of business on the forum? That wouldn't have helped in TF's case however. There is no better way to warn newbies of ongoing scammers than the current trust system.
|
|
|
|
Lohoris (OP)
|
|
November 17, 2013, 11:09:43 PM |
|
I understand where you are coming from, but I think the benefits far outweigh the negatives. Maybe limit DefaultTrust to those who have done a lot of business on the forum? That wouldn't have helped in TF's case however.
There is no better way to warn newbies of ongoing scammers than the current trust system.
Yes there is: having a base trust of -1 instead of 0 towards everyone. After all, you shouldn't trust random people. Then, if you manually chose to trust someone, well, it's your own action instead of a default.
|
|
|
|
User705
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 896
Merit: 1006
First 100% Liquid Stablecoin Backed by Gold
|
|
November 17, 2013, 11:11:27 PM |
|
If you check his trust, you see that Theymos added him to default trust, with the comment, "Responsibly disclosed forum security flaws." so I'd imagine thats how he got on the default trust network.
But really, he had tons of feedback, being on the default trust list I don't really think gave him any additional power after he had an additional 100 people leave good feedback for him. Assuming Tradefortress actually planned the long con if it was one, the default trust wouldn't help him all that much past a certain point.
In all fairness, I believe its just as likely that he staged the hack, as it is it was actually a hack, and now he just can't pay back the Bitcoins. Either way, a lot of people are out money.
He was involved in a few small scams before, but some people like me (not on the default trust) would not risk giving him bad feedback as he would just give us badfeed back and only his would hurt. Go look into his ripple scams and some of the other projects he was paid to do... That guy was shady as fuck! hell just for operating his business where all he did was pay people out, meaning ponzi would have got a neg rating from me had he not been default trusted. But whatever... Are you saying that as a fact or a possibility? If you were intimidated to leave negative trust for fear of retaliation isn't that about as good an indicator as any that it's not working?
|
|
|
|
Lohoris (OP)
|
|
November 17, 2013, 11:17:51 PM |
|
Are you saying that as a fact or a possibility? If you were intimidated to leave negative trust for fear of retaliation isn't that about as good an indicator as any that it's not working?
That's exactly what we are saying. BTW it's a fact: I did check TradeFortress' trust, and noticed that many people who gave him a negative feedback got one back from him, and since he was in DefaultTrust they were basically marked as scammers when what they actually did was quite the opposite. And that's why I posted this thread instead of giving him a negative feedback. I'm not saying that theymos was actively an accomplice, but he was likely social-engineered/blackmailed into putting him in DefaultTrust, and this is the result. The least he could do is putting an and to this INSANE system, since it only benefits the scammers. (hint: actually if he wanted to do something more, unless I'm mistaken this forum holds a huge amount of unspent BTC from "donations"... how huge is that pile?)
|
|
|
|
dank
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1134
Merit: 1002
You cannot kill love
|
|
November 17, 2013, 11:21:58 PM |
|
There is no better way to warn newbies of ongoing scammers than the current trust system. Yes there is, it's very simple. You post your feelings in the thread you assume they are scamming people in. This gives the person you're accusing a fair chance to explain their side and their legitimacy. This way, people get both sides of the story and can form an educated opinion on the matter. The thing is, you guys are trying to implement a system that will stop scammers, which will never happen, it's impossible without an upbringing in moral responsibility and compassion of the individual. Only a shift in consciousness can prevent negative intentions from being executed, only love for one another as the brothers and sisters that we are. As it is used today it has prevented free trade from taking place on this community by creating FUD in those who see a warning sign next to anybodies name.
|
|
|
|
Vod
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3878
Merit: 3163
Licking my boob since 1970
|
|
November 17, 2013, 11:23:32 PM |
|
There is no better way to warn newbies of ongoing scammers than the current trust system. Yes there is, it's very simple. You post your feelings in the thread you assume they are scamming people in. This gives the person you're accusing a fair chance to explain their side and their legitimacy. This way, people get both sides of the story and can form an educated opinion on the matter. And then what dank? We have to follow you around to every thread you post in Newbies, warning people you have stolen close to $10,000? Too much work.
|
|
|
|
Lohoris (OP)
|
|
November 17, 2013, 11:25:48 PM |
|
And then what dank? We have to follow you around to every thread you post in Newbies, warning people you have stolen close to $10,000? Too much work.
With DefaultTrust: - some scammers will be labeled as trustworthy, free to scam people - people denuncing them will be labeled as scammers Without DefaultTrust, and -1 base trust: - everyone is "untrusted, trade with extreme caution" by default, so you should always be wary (as you actually should) - if you actually really trust someone, you add him and you inherit his trust list I fail to see how you are missing that yet
|
|
|
|
Vod
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3878
Merit: 3163
Licking my boob since 1970
|
|
November 17, 2013, 11:28:50 PM |
|
And then what dank? We have to follow you around to every thread you post in Newbies, warning people you have stolen close to $10,000? Too much work.
With DefaultTrust: - some scammers will be labeled as trustworthy, free to scam people - people denuncing them will be labeled as scammers Without DefaultTrust, and -1 base trust: - everyone is "untrusted, trade with extreme caution" by default, so you should always be wary (as you actually should) - if you actually really trust someone, you add him and you inherit his trust list I fail to see how you are missing that yet People would soon ignore the "Trade with extreme caution!" if they saw it on every account. It would no different than everyone having zero trust, like it is now.
|
|
|
|
dank
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1134
Merit: 1002
You cannot kill love
|
|
November 17, 2013, 11:31:14 PM |
|
There is no better way to warn newbies of ongoing scammers than the current trust system. Yes there is, it's very simple. You post your feelings in the thread you assume they are scamming people in. This gives the person you're accusing a fair chance to explain their side and their legitimacy. This way, people get both sides of the story and can form an educated opinion on the matter. And then what dank? We have to follow you around to every thread you post in Newbies, warning people you have stolen close to $10,000? Too much work. Ha! Like you haven't been doing that anyways? Funny man you are. You clearly still have not comprehended that a failure to return an investment does not indicate the deliberate intentions stealing or scamming does imply. If we are going to have a judgment system, it needs to be based on cold hard facts, not opinions. And I really don't see why there's a hierarchy of trusted users, what makes their opinion any more valid than anyone else as to hide the rest? Regardless, all systems fail.
|
|
|
|
User705
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 896
Merit: 1006
First 100% Liquid Stablecoin Backed by Gold
|
|
November 17, 2013, 11:32:28 PM |
|
But the current default trust people gain financially from said trust so it's not likely they will just drop it and exchange it for a bright red warning sign.
|
|
|
|
Lohoris (OP)
|
|
November 17, 2013, 11:36:27 PM |
|
People would soon ignore the "Trade with extreme caution!" if they saw it on every account. It would no different than everyone having zero trust, like it is now.
(first, "now" it is not zero for every account, because there is DefaultTrust) And... that would be fine. Unless you plan to physically send a guy to every user's home to check what he is doing, you can't prevent someone from hurting themselves. You can warn them, though. But this is not about 0 vs. -1 base trust, this is about removing this insane DefaultTrust, after it has been shown so eloquently and spectacularly how it is dead wrong.
|
|
|
|
Lohoris (OP)
|
|
November 17, 2013, 11:38:28 PM |
|
But the current default trust people gain financially from said trust so it's not likely they will just drop it and exchange it for a bright red warning sign.
Reality contradicts you. TradeFortress did just that. pirate40 basically did the same, even if that's before this system AFAIK. Once you reach a certain theresold of money you can steal, if you're a thief you will steal it, and that's just that.
|
|
|
|
Vod
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3878
Merit: 3163
Licking my boob since 1970
|
|
November 17, 2013, 11:43:26 PM |
|
But the current default trust people gain financially from said trust so it's not likely they will just drop it and exchange it for a bright red warning sign.
I don't make anything from having positive trust. In the past I escrowed a couple deals for a few dimes, but that's not worth it to me anymore. I'm not paid at all - I volunteer all my time on here.
|
|
|
|
User705
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 896
Merit: 1006
First 100% Liquid Stablecoin Backed by Gold
|
|
November 17, 2013, 11:46:28 PM |
|
But the current default trust people gain financially from said trust so it's not likely they will just drop it and exchange it for a bright red warning sign.
Reality contradicts you. TradeFortress did just that. pirate40 basically did the same, even if that's before this system AFAIK. Once you reach a certain theresold of money you can steal, if you're a thief you will steal it, and that's just that. Let me clarify. Right now there's a set of users who are default trust green to all newcomers. Many conduct various BTC businesses and/or regular exchange transactions. By virtue of their perceived trust to newcomers they get preferential treatment wether it's better exchange rates or items get sent to them 1st which is a financial benefit. So why would anyone willingly give that up?
|
|
|
|
dank
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1134
Merit: 1002
You cannot kill love
|
|
November 17, 2013, 11:48:51 PM |
|
I'm not paid at all - I volunteer all my time on here.
I don't buy it, vod is a paid shill trying to stir FUD imo. He's been at it, spreading misinfo, for over a year. Nobody could accidentally compose so many false statements on accident.
|
|
|
|
Kouye
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
Cuddling, censored, unicorn-shaped troll.
|
|
November 17, 2013, 11:58:02 PM Last edit: November 18, 2013, 12:14:28 AM by Kouye |
|
Btw im now in the default list.
Confirmed, Goat got promoted by badbear. DefaultTrust sirius theymos HostFat MagicalTux mikegogulski Luke-Jr dooglus Raize Maged Carnth TECSHARE Caesium dilatedPixel phantastisch OgNasty CanaryInTheMine paraipan John (John K.) danieldaniel pekv2 Ukyo dree12 Tomatocage SaltySpitoon ineededausername DeaDTerra BadBear Blazr xkrikl BCB PsychoticBoy btharper burnside Akka TheButterZone LoweryCBS stenkross Benson Samuel johnniewalker escrow.ms shiftybugger ThickAsThieves fluidjax MikeMark binaryFate dwdoc Tywill DefaultTrust BayAreaCoins HostFat theymos rb1205 paci Stemby ziomik ercolinux diego1000 bertani Maged theymos Gavin Andresen MagicalTux casascius tysat piuk sveetsnelda John (John K.) BadBear DefaultTrust OgNasty nonnakip DefaultTrust CanaryInTheMine Miner-TE Noitev luv2drnkbr Digigami E zapeta bitpop TECSHARE redcomet ipxtreme Philj os2sam knybe Trance104 CrazyGuy sveetsnelda conv3rsion tlr bitcoin-rigs.com dtmcnamara notme FCTaiChi Mushroomized Maidak mainichi greeners dribbits echris1 SaltySpitoon bitcoiner49er freshzive arklan Pistachio tarrant_01 tbcoin ElideN friedcat Bees Brothers Christoban Stale af_newbie eroxors camolist cncguru PsychoticBoy Dabs mem Namworld lky_svn 420 mr2dave gektek johnny5 dyingdreams Zillions phrog Domrada philipma1957 jborkl RicRock jmutch MonocleMan CoinHoarder absinth (^_^) der_troll soy Ozymandias iluvpcs batt01 xstr8guy MJGrae mobile nubbins ThickAsThieves hephaist0s BitcoinValet Timzim103 Rounder Nemo1024 TheXev Benny1985 hanti ssinc Kaega finlof True___Blue elchorizo fewerlaws bitterdog Swimmer63 locksmith9 Krellan Spendulus MikeMike statdude bluespaceant Hiroaki keeron Bigdaddyaz Polyatomic palmface flowdab SpaceCadet photon dwdoc xzempt mackstuart bmoconno mrtg maxpower xjack CommanderVenus Plesk helipotte aurel57 gambitv boyohi LaserHorse chalidore slashopt drofdelm canth cdogster DBOD DefaultTrust DustMite pixl8tr namoom blblr Taugeran arc45 smscotten Cilantro chadtn kinger1331 rumlazy fractalbc fforforest KyrosKrane bitdigger2013 jaslo BorisAlt ASICSAUCE steelcave buyer99 digeros west17m Trillium ziggysisland ryhan zac2013 atomriot metal_jacke1 Apheration spacebob 2byZi terrapinflyer BenTheRighteous gsr18 Paddy John (John K.) sirius theymos MagicalTux Maged BadBear DefaultTrust Tomatocage theymos Gavin Andresen grue Maged Kluge jwzguy tysat Graet OgNasty the joint Vod John (John K.) pekv2 wallet.dat BadBear Blazr BCB LoweryCBS DefaultTrust SaltySpitoon DefaultTrust BadBear theymos nanotube casascius Raize Maged tysat zvs malevolent Korbman Vod John (John K.) dree12 Tomatocage SaltySpitoon Deprived Chaang Noi (Goat) ช้างน้อย Augusto Croppo BCB TheButterZone DannyHamilton Boelens favdesu escrow.ms Otoh jackjack Eisenhower34 Bees Brothers Projects DannyHamilton Benson Samuel buysellbitcoin jasonslow webr3 vitalemontea axorb Dragooon americandesi Equate DefaultTrust ashish12 EDIT : that and BCB being on badbear direct trust list made me remove badbear from mine. Warning this post contains a tracking pixel. Or 2.
|
[OVER] RIDDLES 2nd edition --- this was claimed. Look out for 3rd edition! I won't ever ask for a loan nor offer any escrow service. If I do, please consider my account as hacked.
|
|
|
AndrewWilliams
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
Fourth richest fictional character
|
|
November 18, 2013, 01:35:03 AM |
|
But the current default trust people gain financially from said trust so it's not likely they will just drop it and exchange it for a bright red warning sign.
I don't make anything from having positive trust. In the past I escrowed a couple deals for a few dimes, but that's not worth it to me anymore. I'm not paid at all - I volunteer all my time on here. Not so fast. You repeatedly interfered in my loan to i3lome after you turned down his loan. You regularly shoot down people who are honest without a reason. You DO have a vested interest in keeping the Lending forum limited to you and your cronies. The way you harassed me for months and abused the trust system by giving me three neg feedback accusing me of being a scammer without any proof, just because I made the loan to i3lome that you wouldn't. So stop saying you don't benefit. You do benefit. You have given positive trust to shady people just because they gave you positive trust to begin with, and sided with you in your trolling escapades. You should be embarrassed for yourself, but I'm sure you already got rid of that thing called a conscious.
|
|
|
|
Vod
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3878
Merit: 3163
Licking my boob since 1970
|
|
November 18, 2013, 01:37:49 AM |
|
But the current default trust people gain financially from said trust so it's not likely they will just drop it and exchange it for a bright red warning sign.
I don't make anything from having positive trust. In the past I escrowed a couple deals for a few dimes, but that's not worth it to me anymore. I'm not paid at all - I volunteer all my time on here. Not so fast. You repeatedly interfered in my loan to i3lome after you turned down his loan. You regularly shoot down people who are honest without a reason. You DO have a vested interest in keeping the Lending forum limited to you and your cronies. The way you harassed me for months and abused the trust system by giving me three neg feedback accusing me of being a scammer without any proof, just because I made the loan to i3lome that you wouldn't. So stop saying you don't benefit. You do benefit. You have given positive trust to shady people just because they gave you positive trust to begin with, and sided with you in your trolling escapades. You should be embarrassed for yourself, but I'm sure you already got rid of that thing called a conscious. Nope, I don't make a thing off of keeping the lending forum free of scammers. Not saying if Theymos offered to pay me I wouldn't take it....
|
|
|
|
|