why facebook and twitter are too low

[irixo10]

The first is because Facebook and Twitter have a large number of participants, and secondly because Twitter and Facebook are done in a very simple way!

Not important to the number of participants. The important thing is that on facebook and twitter there are not many known crypto. They usually ignore the sharing, and only in bitcointalk and youtube are easy access to those who know about crypto. So Facebook and twitter are always low in pool

[hidrocop]

I think it might take less time. You can perform the desired task very quickly.

[Alex Bogo]

Yes, participation in social companies is thankless job. And most often the reward doesn't justify expense of time for posts, retweets, writing of reports. Tasks in social companies are rather simple therefore there are a lot of participants. On Twitter the excessive number of participants are bots, and because of that strongly reduced reward size. The situation on Facebook is a little better, but not much. Also there's no limits of participants and quite easy rules.

[Floder1]

Yes Facebook campaign is not easy to do but the allocations are always low. That is why I find It not interesting anymore.

[numpadxx5]

i just wonder why facebook and twitter are too low in terms of pool allocation, what i m seeing now is not longer encouraging about doing facebook and twitter anymore again. facebook and twitter are more stressful compared to other pools but it seems they have less reward.
watch out the stress in retwitting and tweetting also post and repost on facebook everyday and everytime writting report come to think the stress.. also emerging how your facebook profile will be filled with picture and text of any campaign which you are advertising. please i m using this moment to plead to bounty managers to add up facebook and twitter (increase the allocation), so wen participating we won't get tired of doing the work (advertising on social media).
also due to the stress some ends up on the way without the program being end while some manage to follow the program to the ends.


please if you agree with me, support me with your send-able merit.
i will appreciate with your merit.

well in social media campaign it's a easy task, just sharing and tweeting the post of the project. And not all of your friend are intersted in crypto currency so no one cares about the shares and tweets that you do.

[Arkham Knight]

First is they can join in many campaigns as long as they can handle it and I've seen many newbie accounts that are only owned by 1 people. If you check the reputation section, you can see that at least 6-7 newbie accounts are proven connect because the user transferred all the tokens that he had received in a single address.

[kudus11]

i just wonder why facebook and twitter are too low in terms of pool allocation, what i m seeing now is not longer encouraging about doing facebook and twitter anymore again. facebook and twitter are more stressful compared to other pools but it seems they have less reward.
watch out the stress in retwitting and tweetting also post and repost on facebook everyday and everytime writting report come to think the stress.. also emerging how your facebook profile will be filled with picture and text of any campaign which you are advertising. please i m using this moment to plead to bounty managers to add up facebook and twitter (increase the allocation), so wen participating we won't get tired of doing the work (advertising on social media).
also due to the stress some ends up on the way without the program being end while some manage to follow the program to the ends.


please if you agree with me, support me with your send-able merit.
i will appreciate with your merit.

I think the gift for Facebook and Twitter can't be a little, maybe because the participants who follow it are so much compared to the signature and also the others who have only a few participants because not all ranks can follow it, maybe that's the reason.

[Vargum]

As a rule, the pool for facebook and twitter is almost the same in most campaigns, 10-15%. There are campaigns that well encourage 20-25%, but such are few. There are a lot of participants on facebook and twitter, of course, I would like the pool to be bigger, but it's not up to us to decide.

[petrovkirill808]

As a rule, the pool for facebook and twitter is almost the same in most campaigns, 10-15%. There are campaigns that well encourage 20-25%, but such are few. There are a lot of participants on facebook and twitter, of course, I would like the pool to be bigger, but it's not up to us to decide.

even if the pool will be more and the number of participants will increase, so this is not an option. you need to complicate the rules of bounty, then the payments will be higher

[Leonard2016]

I think those social networks are time waisting, because there are too many participants in those social networks and bigger participants means smaller stakes, I used to work on them before but I found out it doesn't worth it, I'd rather translation campaigns, YouTube bounty and signature campaigns instead.

[LadyK]

Because the task is too easy, and the number of participants is too large, even though its pool is quite large. So it is not easy to both earn a lot of money.

[lumira555]

I was surprised yesterday that I was blocked for a day in facebook. I could not send a message on the bounty. Now it's normal

[apoorvlathey]

Social media campaigns like facebook and twitter are not at all stressful ! One can even complete them in the last minute by just pressing the like/share button on all the posts of  the social media account of the project.
The click to post of these campaigns is very low mainly due to garbage accounts with no real followers. Bounty hunters follow each other and never ever use their accounts apart from spammingly sharing the posts.

[AlaEhBTC]

Maybe because joining facebook and twitter campaign is easy compared to other campaigns. That is why they get a lot of joiners and if there are too many participants, you will get less tokens via stakes computation. Best thing to do is to maximize your number of friends or followers to get higher stakes.

[jebul2]

in my opinion, bro, because now there are a lot of participants and a little allocation, the list of participants is not limited, which I often experience and finally we get very small prizes.

[Jiucaige]

This may be because Facebook and Twitter do not bring more practical effects to the project, because the role of Facebook and Twitter is not very obvious compared to signatures and videos!

[pacifista]

If you checked other bounties social media has greater reward than signature and in some categories,meaning that social media campaign is giving such a good impact on the project.

[kudus11]

i just wonder why facebook and twitter are too low in terms of pool allocation, what i m seeing now is not longer encouraging about doing facebook and twitter anymore again. facebook and twitter are more stressful compared to other pools but it seems they have less reward.
watch out the stress in retwitting and tweetting also post and repost on facebook everyday and everytime writting report come to think the stress.. also emerging how your facebook profile will be filled with picture and text of any campaign which you are advertising. please i m using this moment to plead to bounty managers to add up facebook and twitter (increase the allocation), so wen participating we won't get tired of doing the work (advertising on social media).
also due to the stress some ends up on the way without the program being end while some manage to follow the program to the ends.


please if you agree with me, support me with your send-able merit.
i will appreciate with your merit.

yes really, bro, why is the prize for Facebook and Twitter campaign so small when we have to try to think every time we make a post or twet, and our results are in prizes with very little coin