Does this seem right to you?

[jayeeyee]

Got my Singles yesterday, plugged it in and started hashing right away.  I'm still not familiar with the units performance statistics yet since I don't have a baseline to compare it to.. but for those that have their 60GH singles.. does my stats seem right to you?  I'm having about 1/3 HW errors compared to accepted shares...which seems pretty high to me.  That's a 30% window.

[Rluner]

I read it as around 0.3% rejected, not 30%.

Yours seem slightly better than mine, which are currently at 0.65% and 0.81%.

[i3lome]

You could tweak your scan times a bit to reduce some hardware errors.

[fattypig]

Got my Singles yesterday, plugged it in and started hashing right away.  I'm still not familiar with the units performance statistics yet since I don't have a baseline to compare it to.. but for those that have their 60GH singles.. does my stats seem right to you?  I'm having about 1/3 HW errors compared to accepted shares...which seems pretty high to me.  That's a 30% window.

Everything looks fine to me. there is a "." in front of 30%.

[waltermot321]

Got my Singles yesterday, plugged it in and started hashing right away.  I'm still not familiar with the units performance statistics yet since I don't have a baseline to compare it to.. but for those that have their 60GH singles.. does my stats seem right to you?  I'm having about 1/3 HW errors compared to accepted shares...which seems pretty high to me.  That's a 30% window.

How did you get that low HW error of 0.3%? Im having about 2-3% here...

[Noruka]

ya mines not even that high. I am at..... just shy of .01
How do you guys have such high rates?

[zvs]

ya mines not even that high. I am at..... just shy of .01
How do you guys have such high rates?

higher latency?  wouldn't the # of work restarts between these pools (except p2pool) be the same? 

those all get HW errors after each restart