Is ICOBench reliable source with ligit ICOs?

[jayco25]

There is a huge number of ICOs coming this year and we need some sort of filter to chose most reliable and ligit ones. I personally use ICOBench.com to filter good ones based on overal ICO rating and segregated ratings per Team, ICO profile, etc. I wonder if it is a good one, or there are more reliable ones out there?

 I never rely of ICO review of ICO BENCH . A lot of good coins with promising project got a bad rating on that site. If you want a good review pay for them that is how ICO Bench work. I suggest make your own review by reading and understand the whitepaper and how the marketing of the project work.


#Support Vanig

[fransupran]

For now I think icobench can still be trusted, I can still see information about ICOs. Many ICOs are registered on icobench, and the information provided is also complete. It's just information beberpa ICOs sometimes do not update, maybe it happens because ICOs listed already too much.

[bigcash2011]

I personally do not highly take weightage of these ico ranking or score websites before investing, yes if my selected ico has high score that is a plus and boosts my confidence but mostly i do not take these scores as my final decision to invest or not.

[rextoinsem]

I don't trust ICObench lately. It seems to me that the community experts have turned the evaluation of ICO projects into a profitable business. There have been many such cases recently that Scam projects are rated high.

[IgniHash]

There is a huge number of ICOs coming this year and we need some sort of filter to chose most reliable and ligit ones. I personally use ICOBench.com to filter good ones based on overal ICO rating and segregated ratings per Team, ICO profile, etc. I wonder if it is a good one, or there are more reliable ones out there?

Personally, this site only gives us an raw information about an ICO.
But the important thing is, we must research deeply about the ICO itself, and do not depends only on the information that ICO listing site provides.

[niteroy]

Yes ICOBench is considered to be the most famous rating site, but I prefer to use many sources when choosing to get as much information as possible about the project that interests me. Naturally, no service will give you a guarantee that the project to which the high score is delivered will be successful and not a fraud. Here at the forum your question has already been raised and it has been answered many times. Just in case, I'll give you a list of some of the services I use myself:
https://icorating.com
https://icomarks.com/icos
https://crushcrypto.com
https://www.icochamps.com
https://tokentops.com/rating/
https://icocrunch.io

[Stargazer]

Don't rely on any ICO Rating, Listing websites. But Icobench is a good source to start research about Good ICO Projects. There are many ICO Rating websites like Icorating, icodrops, coin checker and many other. But Icobench is the best among them, but it is not worthy to follow to invest your money. In Icobench they listed many Projects with good ratings. But The fact is Many people manipulate the expert rating system on icobench. They registered lots of ICO Projects as a good rating ICOs.  But those all ICO can't make success, Some ICO Got failed and scam. So, don't rely on the icobench, Use Icobench as a notebook for the future research!

[indobitcoin.tk]

that kind of rating sites has no meaning for me. many who have good rating ICO but in fact, there are results not in accordance with the rating. of course, this will make the site rating as it only as a complementary course. better do the analysis yourself so satisfied with the results that can be obtained.

[lisapunt]

It's good but they failes sometimes on the past so don't take with 100% trust.

[QueenW]

You can not trust completely to any sources, even the most popular ones. I sometimes look at this resource and they really select good projects. but still I check it again on my own.

[bestcoins1]

Yes ICOBench is considered to be the most famous rating site, but I prefer to use many sources when choosing to get as much information as possible about the project that interests me. Naturally, no service will give you a guarantee that the project to which the high score is delivered will be successful and not a fraud. Here at the forum your question has already been raised and it has been answered many times. Just in case, I'll give you a list of some of the services I use myself:
https://icorating.com
https://icomarks.com/icos
https://crushcrypto.com
https://www.icochamps.com
https://tokentops.com/rating/
https://icocrunch.io

icobench is most famous rating site because i think they are have an expert in crypto to analyze the ICO project and give it a rating whether the ICO is good or not, there are also many advisors in icobench.

[m suheri99]

just one you choose which ICO is good for you and which is good in the future. because ICO definitely pays them to green them as a good cause. there is no harm in your review before you choose.

[Tokenicide]

No. Not at all. We've been extremely critical of them, citing obvious conflicts of interest and unrealistic ratings given in exchange for money or advisory board positions. There are many independent journalists and bloggers that have written about them as well. Our expose is called "ICObench Warmer," available here: https://www.tokenicide.com/opinion/icobench-warmer/.

Lately they've become even less professional and more desperate. One of their experts doxed a contributor to our site and another one threatened a lawsuit, which you can see in the comments to this post: https://www.tokenicide.com/review/ico-update-etherinc/.

Supposedly they used to be more reliable but in the past few months the site is effectively useless.

[VanDeinsberg12]

Yes ICOBench is considered to be the most famous rating site, but I prefer to use many sources when choosing to get as much information as possible about the project that interests me. Naturally, no service will give you a guarantee that the project to which the high score is delivered will be successful and not a fraud. Here at the forum your question has already been raised and it has been answered many times. Just in case, I'll give you a list of some of the services I use myself:
https://icorating.com
https://icomarks.com/icos
https://crushcrypto.com
https://www.icochamps.com
https://tokentops.com/rating/
https://icocrunch.io

icobench is most famous rating site because i think they are have an expert in crypto to analyze the ICO project and give it a rating whether the ICO is good or not, there are also many advisors in icobench.

Have you ever seen about the latest news about that? icobench just a scam site that has been getting paid to give a rating and listing the scam projects. There is bunch of scam projects are listed on the ico bench site. That's worst ico rating site ever i seen.

[danbitcoin1]

No, there's been loads of people showing proof that it's easy to purchase fake ratings on there and increase their overall rating.

[lavishlifing]

I don't recommend using icobench.com as a guide for Project/ICO investing, because lately there have been negative reports (for example, paid experts, and paid rating)

[goodluck0319]

Noticed that on ICOBENCH are gaining great ratings higher than 3-4 stars, those projects which ultimately did not gain or long to go public. but there are ICO with a rating of less than two - they give very good results. This means that these ratings, too, need look from whom affixed.

[burdagol12345]

There is a huge number of ICOs coming this year and we need some sort of filter to chose most reliable and ligit ones. I personally use ICOBench.com to filter good ones based on overal ICO rating and segregated ratings per Team, ICO profile, etc. I wonder if it is a good one, or there are more reliable ones out there?

Thats why we should not ever rely on such score things, But we do can use icobench to check whether the team is real or not, cause they got a KYC on team, but still i think we should not rely on this scoring. The best way to find good ICO is by doing research and find it by yourself.

[ambisyon]

I believe that ICO Bench is one of the sources I use in selecting ICO for my signature bounty campaign participation. I usually check the ICO ratings using ICO Bench and the ratings were part of my consideration before I join in the campaign. It's information is very reliable and trusted by many bounty hunters in this forum and I believe they do continue to use this site as their reference in the selection of the right signature campaign they will participate.

[Alluro]

A few days ago I have seen someone selling icobench reviews on here. Some project owners paying advisors to write a review. I have seen icobench 4+ rated ICOs already scammed. In these days most ICOs scamming and cheating. Then we have to be careful to find a good ICO in this time. You have to do your own research to find a good ICO.