Bitcoin Forum
June 15, 2024, 09:22:52 AM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Why Novacoin is more valuable than PPCoin ?  (Read 1069 times)
benishak (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 13
Merit: 0


View Profile
October 23, 2013, 08:01:13 AM
 #1

Hi

In BTC-e Novacoin is traded for 0.028 BTC but PPCoin is traded for 0.0015

Why NVC is more valuable than PPC, though NVC is newer than PPC and was considered as a scam for a long time!
when we want to talk about it technically, both coins are the same, they support PoW/PoS except that PPC uses SHA and NVC use Scrypt, it's likely that :
PPC = BTC + PoS/PoW
NVC = LTC + PoS/PoW

it looks normal when NVC more valuable as LTC but i think PPC is better than NVC as it uses SHA which is less power consumer ..
ImmortAlex
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784
Merit: 501


View Profile
October 23, 2013, 09:42:15 AM
 #2

Take a look to coinmarketcap.com :

PPC:
Market Cap = $ 6,190,207
Price = $ 0.30
Total supply = 20,596,509 PPC

NVC:
Market Cap = $ 1,839,962
Price = $ 4.02
Total supply = 458,113 NVC

Are you still consider NVC is more valuable? Smiley
Price of one coin means nothing. One NVC coin cost more just because each generated block emits less coins than in PPC model.
benishak (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 13
Merit: 0


View Profile
October 23, 2013, 09:53:03 AM
 #3

Thanks ImmortAlex for the useful info and link
this makes now more sense Smiley

is there any place to trade ppc/usd and ppc/eur ? as in BTC-e there is only PPC/BTC

pmconrad
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 149
Merit: 102


View Profile WWW
October 23, 2013, 10:09:02 AM
 #4

is there any place to trade ppc/usd and ppc/eur ? as in BTC-e there is only PPC/BTC

https://cryptonit.net/exchange/eur/ppc
https://cryptonit.net/exchange/usd/ppc

3cryo
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 5
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 23, 2013, 08:02:16 AM
 #5

it looks normal when NVC more valuable as LTC but i think PPC is better than NVC as it uses SHA which is less power consumer ..

Is SHA really a lower power consumer than scrypt?  I guess per hash it is, but there seems to be a lot more network power going into SHA than scrypt... i.e. Bitcoin.




Anonylz
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 2562
Merit: 577



View Profile
December 23, 2013, 09:09:35 AM
 #6

it looks normal when NVC more valuable as LTC but i think PPC is better than NVC as it uses SHA which is less power consumer ..

Is SHA really a lower power consumer than scrypt?  I guess per hash it is, but there seems to be a lot more network power going into SHA than scrypt... i.e. Bitcoin.






No but PoS uses less power then PoW. The only problem for me is that it generates coins based on a interest model. When I got into Bitcoin, I was so happy this coin is generated without interest, but ppc unfortunately does use interest, generating coins if you hold a lot of coins (this is my understanding of PoS) I do not like interest and that's why I do not own any PoS coins like ppc nvc or cgb.

██▄     ▄▄░
▀██▄ ▄██▀
▄▄███████████████████▄▄
▄█████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀█████▄
████▀                   ▀████
████       ▄▄█████▄▄  ▀▄   ████
████      ▄██████████▄▀    ████
████      ████████▀▀       ████
████  ▄▀ ▄██▀▀▀   ▄██      ████
████   ▀▀     ▄▄███▀       ████
████▄                   ▄████
▀█████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█████▀
▀▀███████████████████▀▀
.
SECONDLIVE
.
CHOOSE LIFE      CHOOSE SPACE      CHOOSE FRIENDS
.
                           Twitter       Telegram      Medium      YouTube      Discord        TikTok         GitHub               
        ▄▄███████▄▄▄
    ▄▄████████████████▄▄
   ████████████████████▄
  ███████▀▀▀█████████████
 ██████▌     ▀████████████
███████▀ ▀▀▄▄██▀▀▀█████████
██████             ▀███████
██████▄             ███████
 ███████▄▄        ▄███████
  ███████████▄▄▄▄█████████
   ▀███████████████████▀
     ▀████████████████▀▀
   ██████████████████████
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!