DerKorb (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
|
|
October 24, 2013, 06:04:30 PM |
|
It's often said bitcoin attacks the states monopoly on printing money. Assuming there would be a point in the future, where in a country bitcoin got more important than the regular currency that country used. So the regular currency would suffer immense inflation and all the people decided to only accept bitcoin, thus taking the state the ability to print new money. How do you think this would affect that states social systems. What if the state would not be able anymore to pay for its citizens needs? What if this led to a system where the old and the sick would not have any support by the state?
|
|
|
|
Mike Christ
aka snapsunny
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1003
|
|
October 24, 2013, 06:22:30 PM |
|
"What if the state would not be able anymore to pay for its citizens needs?"
The state doesn't pay for anyone, because it makes no money. Since the state gets all its cash (hypothetically, without referring to secret taxation or bonds) from people, what you're asking is, "What if we can't force people to pay for other people?" My answer is, "Finally we're making some progress."
"What if this led to a system where the old and the sick would not have any support by the state?"
People would have to learn how to take care of themselves and another. People who cannot find anyone to take care of them will get worse and likely die; if one doesn't want this to happen, one should take care of people, instead of worrying about whether or not we can force other people to pay for other people. Fair enough, yes?
Anyway, what would happen when a nation could no longer have its own currency, I theorize, that nation would have to resort to a flat rate tax and give you a bill at the end of the year of everything you owe. The state cannot sell bonds (i.e. your children's futures) without its own currency, nor can it inflate its own currency to death (that secret tax), thus forcing the state to remain small and focused primarily on serving its people, as opposed to empire building, i.e. war, fancy construction and turning independent people into dependents through welfare.
The power taken from the people through fiat currencies would then return to the people. I can't tell you exactly what will happen, but I find this a step in the right direction. There will likely be a short-term period of intense pain as the wealth is redistributed, but remember what I said: "As opposed to empire building." If Bitcoin, or other currencies that cannot be printed to death, were the primary usage of the planet's economy, empires could no longer form. War would be far more costly, impossible to sustain for long periods of time. People would be far more independent and freedom-oriented; they would no longer have any need to wish for the state to be their nanny. The general wealth of each person would be far superior.
|
|
|
|
gochk
|
|
October 24, 2013, 06:40:32 PM |
|
With China's call for a new world reserve currency and with Saudi Arabia contemplating moving away from USD in its oil trade, the more interesting question to me is "What do you think would happen if BTC replaces USD as a world reserve currency?" I know the idea is far-fetched and very unlikely to happen, hey, can't blame a guy for dreaming!!
|
|
|
|
wasserman99
|
|
October 24, 2013, 07:28:28 PM |
|
it wouldn't. no sovereign government will give up their right to print money. no way.
|
|
|
|
Mike Christ
aka snapsunny
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1003
|
|
October 24, 2013, 07:31:42 PM |
|
it wouldn't. no sovereign government will give up their right to print money. no way.
Then I guess the people would have to do it behind their government's back. Now we see a clear distinction between a plot of land with people living on it, and a state.
|
|
|
|
wasserman99
|
|
October 24, 2013, 07:32:32 PM |
|
it wouldn't. no sovereign government will give up their right to print money. no way.
Then I guess the people would have to do it behind their government's back. Now we see a clear distinction between a plot of land with people living on it, and a state. exactly! need some real cultural changes though before such a movement could start
|
|
|
|
nahtnam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
nahtnam.com
|
|
October 24, 2013, 11:55:56 PM |
|
I really dont think that bitcoin will not be an official currency for a country! Mainly because of the fact that the government has no control, and bitcoin is very anonymous!
|
|
|
|
petersiddle98
|
|
October 25, 2013, 02:07:32 AM |
|
It would be great for zimbabwe to replace its currency to Bitcoin, since their currency is like toilet paper with inks..
|
|
|
|
nahtnam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
nahtnam.com
|
|
October 25, 2013, 02:20:45 AM |
|
It would be great for zimbabwe to replace its currency to Bitcoin, since their currency is like toilet paper with inks..
hahaha, if I bought toilet paper in America and went to Zimbabwe, will I be rich? EDIT: I forgot about the ink... Would a color printer work?
|
|
|
|
HyperBeam
Member
Offline
Activity: 64
Merit: 10
|
|
October 25, 2013, 03:12:12 AM |
|
Except the Zimbabwean dollar was abandoned in 2009, so they aren't worth anything anymore.
|
|
|
|
nahtnam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
nahtnam.com
|
|
October 25, 2013, 05:26:00 AM |
|
Except the Zimbabwean dollar was abandoned in 2009, so they aren't worth anything anymore.
Really? What is their currency then?
|
|
|
|
dillpicklechips
|
|
October 25, 2013, 05:33:03 AM |
|
Except the Zimbabwean dollar was abandoned in 2009, so they aren't worth anything anymore.
Really? What is their currency then? I think it's an open market. Most are using USD if I remember correctly.
|
|
|
|
nahtnam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
nahtnam.com
|
|
October 25, 2013, 05:35:21 AM |
|
Except the Zimbabwean dollar was abandoned in 2009, so they aren't worth anything anymore.
Really? What is their currency then? I think it's an open market. Most are using USD if I remember correctly. Then there is a very high potential for bitcoin to be the currency of zimbabwe! All someone needs to do is introduce everyone to Bitcoin!
|
|
|
|
Mike Christ
aka snapsunny
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1003
|
|
October 25, 2013, 09:21:59 AM |
|
Except the Zimbabwean dollar was abandoned in 2009, so they aren't worth anything anymore.
Really? What is their currency then? I think it's an open market. Most are using USD if I remember correctly. Then there is a very high potential for bitcoin to be the currency of zimbabwe! All someone needs to do is introduce everyone to Bitcoin! That would be a very good idea, considering they don't have much time before the USD goes splat.
|
|
|
|
t3xasdolly
|
|
October 25, 2013, 09:40:16 AM |
|
This would certainly be beneficial for everyone in the long run. I'm sick of the government printing tons of money and spending most of it for warfare..
Electronical money only is not possible even in USA today. It will take time and when there will be no paper money all will use just credit cards
|
|
|
|
evansearle42
|
|
October 25, 2013, 10:33:43 AM |
|
It would be great for zimbabwe to replace its currency to Bitcoin, since their currency is like toilet paper with inks..
hahaha, if I bought toilet paper in America and went to Zimbabwe, will I be rich? EDIT: I forgot about the ink... Would a color printer work?
|
|
|
|
evansearle42
|
|
October 25, 2013, 10:36:02 AM |
|
The zimbabwe dollar is cheaper then toilet paper. So everyone used that instead. Right now they are only using USD as a currency
|
|
|
|
poelling92
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 994
Merit: 1002
|
|
October 25, 2013, 11:57:21 AM |
|
No, bitcoin in current implementation can not process so many transactions daily that would be necessary. Current limit is about 7 transactions per second
But keep dreaming...
|
|
|
|
HashEngineering
|
|
October 29, 2013, 05:52:23 AM |
|
No, bitcoin in current implementation can not process so many transactions daily that would be necessary. Current limit is about 7 transactions per second
What is the reason for the 7 transactions per second limitation? Does it have to do with the maximum block size, which will on average cover only 10 minutes of time (which during that time is a maximum of 4200 transactions)?
|
|
|
|
rampalija
|
|
October 29, 2013, 07:27:24 AM |
|
No, bitcoin in current implementation can not process so many transactions daily that would be necessary. Current limit is about 7 transactions per second
But keep dreaming...
the code can be changed to support this. Besides there are alts. we are expecting that to be done in near future. BTC will only have the value if the ppl interest goes up
|
|
|
|
|