BTCtalk help me

[Rux]

Just to say, im still Rux from this account, and it has never ben sold.

if my twitter account can help, it was created as same time as bitcointalk account

https://twitter.com/UFFcrypto

[1714154226]

1714154226

[Rux]

i sad MAYBE, that cannot be like i sold my account.

Yes, I understand that but there was some interest (therefore, you were tagged).

about BTC address...damn bro, i really cannot recall what address i used back in days, so many wallets i used i dont recall.

I was able to find the following two BTCitcoin addresses (from your post history):

1CmtdVzGHRJkb4sBtyczfaWSqJjsktrA2F - Unedited and has been quoted multiple times (archived)
1Bb5CPxTDhDGfYHy8Vqio5DbrZu2Tzfyzy - Unedited but hasn't been quoted yet (archived it for you)

Simply sign a message using the above two addresses.

both of those addresses are from Primedice and 777Coin so i dont have access to them, but i still have accounts i think...

[DdmrDdmr]

This thread should really not be in Beginners and Help, but rather more in Reputation to get proper attention. Even so, each negative rating can only be removed by the account that placed it in the first place. You could try sending them a PM to begin with, since some DT changes in recent months may lead to some reconsideration. @suchmoon should be easy to contact, but @zepher I fear will turn out to be a feat ... (see https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5174984.0).

[Rux]

I contacted suchmoon, and ... i dunno what happend, but he just replied with

"I have removed the rating."

Im glad this happened, because every day is history in crypto world, and i don't want to be remembered as fraud or something like that.

@suchmoon thank you again!

as for first rating, im sorry if that happened to @zepher

Rux, Crypto.ba

[DdmrDdmr]

@suchmoon and other DT members are perhaps more inclined to review some of their ratings and their prime focus in the past few months due to some DT changes, and likely decided to remove it reviewing the motive of the negative given at the time. The pending negative from @zepher could well be rather long lasting: He’s currently DT2, and has quite a large list of DT1 people who trust him (see http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-24_Sat_08.13h/369879.html) and his long list of provided feedback.

[suchmoon]

I contacted suchmoon, and ... i dunno what happend, but he just replied with

No mystery here... It's been a while and your "infraction" seems to be of the "unlikely to do it again" variety.

[Rux]

Thank you again, and be assured this beloved account wont be sold, ever

[LogitechMouse]

Thank you again, and be assured this beloved account wont be sold, ever

If I have a Legendary account, I would not sold it either because......... Kidding 

[Rux]

Thank you again, and be assured this beloved account wont be sold, ever

If I have a Legendary account, I would not sold it either because......... Kidding  

In reality, account does not prove nothing, but its sentimental for me, but truth is that many members are using btctalk accounts to scam many people, so yea, my username would not be used for that.

Heck, not even one sig. campaign, not even one FUD/Scam from this account.

[Rose_btc]

There were such cases before also and you can check out this thread:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5086816.0

Here in this account it is mentioned the signature about the negative trust. I think similar signature could let people know about the negative feedback reason.

If you get positive trust in future say +2 your total trust will be 1 that is    +2 / =1 / -1. Even one positive trust can neutralise. 

[Rux]

Thanks for infos, now i must find way to get trust

Can creating a crypto community from Balkan, with over 1k members, count as trust?  

if my community members reading this pls go to this link and leave positive feedback

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=105737

[DdmrDdmr]

<...>

It doesn't really work like that ... See https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5149666.msg52312354#msg52312354 for further details. There have been changes lately that I specified in the referenced post.

[Rux]

Hello friends, i have been so bussy i totaly forgot this post.

Again, im still Rux and we proved that.

[Cadaver20]

You are an unlucky member of this forum. We have nothing to do but express our sympathy for you. But you can be sure that you are not alone. There are many more like you. A few days ago, a person I knew got a negative trust for a false reason. He could not prove his innocence. When someone gets negative trust, no one believes him.  Rather despises him.

Anyway you are Rux and keep continuing as Rux.

[Rux]

Imagine this, some VOD gave me another negative saying  i sold my account

damn this is getting to much

[DdmrDdmr]

@Vod gave you a Neutral feedback really (not a negative feedback – see the colour of the feedback). The rating does therefore not count in the same counter as @Zepher’s. Neutral feedback’s are meant to be more of a comment, than a statement in terms of trust, although any comment on the Trust page is subject to the influence of whomever placed the comment, whatever its nature (Positive, Negative or Neutral), and whether he’s on DT or not.

On the other hand, the flag you’ve created on @Vod is void in principle, since it does not really pinpoint any specific evidence that one may lose money when dealing with @Vod. The reference is generic, pointing to a massive thread, but not concrete on evidence (on risk of losing money).

All in all, that’s why I particularly don’t like the Trust system too much. Call me an idealist, but I still believe it should represent the concept of commerce for the most (ideally all), and often, it goes off-track to represent retaliation, grudges or aspects that have nothing to do with the original intent. For example, my positive trust, which I do appreciate, is not really correct, since it is not based on anything commerce related.

I’d rather much prefer a proper trust system solely for commerce (needs to be rethinked), and a wall for any other type of comments.

[Rux]

i removed my flag to VOD, it was over-reacting, my bad.

as sa normal crypto user that is here for more than 8years, i still dont get these rules.

i understand that there must be rules, but flagging someone just because it can... thats just to much

again, im easily losing my will to be here anyway, and i really love btctalk and what it represent, but getting flags like this every time i say something wrong is not ideal

i wish you all best life i will just carry on learning people about blockchain in general but on crypto.ba

hugs and kisses, be good, be positive

[Rux]

We did some quality work on crypto adoption in these parts of world.

And again thank you all for supporting me all these years!

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5278812.msg55280904#msg55280904

[nakamura12]

You should provide the information that proves that you are the real owner of the account. If your account did ever joined signature campaigns then you should prove that you hage full control of the address thta used in the campaign but if your account is not used in any sig camps then provide the information that they require to believe that it is yours truly then you kight have a chance that the red tdust may be removed.

[Rux]

sure buddy, but my account never did any of signature campaigns, and admins can prove that.