The idea for admins to support newcomers with merit

[Lunarics]

I'm not against this system and the system of ranks that was. I also love history, and your system of ranks and the addition that you made with merit began to resemble a bourgeois system. ^{Words from Lenin's book : Reforms are those changes that do not take away power in the state from the hands of the old ruling class. Changes of the opposite nature are called "storm". The class interests of bourgeois liberalism require only reforms, for the bourgeoisie is afraid of "storms" more than the reactions, the bourgeoisie wants to preserve the old, feudal institutions for protection against the workers.} Lenin V.I. About two ways.
You look who furiously supports the system of merit Full Member Sr. Member Hero Member Legendary. And I just offered the idea to support the newcomers not to 100 merits but only 1 to 5 but not all started counting again that their power is taken away. I did not think that your system would lead to such a pyramid that I drew 1 month after the merit system. But the facts show that this is so!

[1715128519]

1715128519

[1715128519]

1715128519

[1715128519]

1715128519

[athanz88]

I'm not against this system and the system of ranks that was. I also love history, and your system of ranks and the addition that you made with merit began to resemble a bourgeois system. ^{Words from Lenin's book : Reforms are those changes that do not take away power in the state from the hands of the old ruling class. Changes of the opposite nature are called "storm". The class interests of bourgeois liberalism require only reforms, for the bourgeoisie is afraid of "storms" more than the reactions, the bourgeoisie wants to preserve the old, feudal institutions for protection against the workers.} Lenin V.I. About two ways.
You look who furiously supports the system of merit Full Member Sr. Member Hero Member Legendary. And I just offered the idea to support the newcomers not to 100 merits but only 1 to 5 but not all started counting again that their power is taken away. I did not think that your system would lead to such a pyramid that I drew 1 month after the merit system. But the facts show that this is so!

img snipped

What you suggest is a kind of an exam, like in the school or college, and i think it is a boring way. This is a forum, not a class, and people studying rate is different from each other, so you can not make an examination like that. Not to mention people can abuse many accounts to enter that exam. But the most funny thing is that if the newbie really studying about the basic of blockchain and bitcoin until he got to Jr. Member, i guess he/ she can score 1 merit, without the system you suggested in OP.

[hilariousetc]

I'm not against this system and the system of ranks that was. I also love history, and your system of ranks and the addition that you made with merit began to resemble a bourgeois system.

Jesus Christ. Stop being a drama queen. Do you people even have any idea how ridiculous you sound? Oh, merit is for the bourgeois. Merit is like Hitler. Merit is like Stalin. Merit is fascism. Merit is Animal Farm. Merit broke my life. Stop crying. Merit is to reward quality posts and to try curb the thousands of shitposters that sign up here purely to spam their way through ranks by writing nothingness. What does having to acquire merit have to do with capitalism or anything else? All it is is shitposters crying that they now can't easily earn money straight away by posting barely coherent guff.

[Lunarics]

What you suggest is a kind of an exam, like in the school or college, and i think it is a boring way. This is a forum, not a class, and people studying rate is different from each other, so you can not make an examination like that. Not to mention people can abuse many accounts to enter that exam. But the most funny thing is that if the newbie really studying about the basic of blockchain and bitcoin until he got to Jr. Member, i guess he/ she can score 1 merit, without the system you suggested in OP.

Well, it's logical to write 1055 posts in 4 months to ask? Here is an example that I encountered and that this information is useful to think about?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1416871

I'm not talking about in-depth knowledge, I'm talking about the initial knowledge that is needed

You are on the forum since September 2017 wrote in two smaller posts than this person
Well, if everything rests on merit, let's exclude this compound!
And we will do differently the beginner can not write messages until the moment the test passes, I understand that it is possible to write bots to train a neural network .... but there is clearly more people who want to understand what is crypto world, but in an forum i see spam and spam

[Lunarics]

I'm not against this system and the system of ranks that was. I also love history, and your system of ranks and the addition that you made with merit began to resemble a bourgeois system.

Jesus Christ. Stop being a drama queen. Do you people even have any idea how ridiculous you sound? Oh, merit is for the bourgeois. Merit is like Hitler. Merit is like Stalin. Merit is fascism. Merit is Animal Farm. Merit broke my life. Stop crying. Merit is to reward quality posts and to try curb the thousands of shitposters that sign up here purely to spam their way through ranks by writing nothingness. What does having to acquire merit have to do with capitalism or anything else? All it is is shitposters crying that they now can't easily earn money straight away by posting barely coherent guff.

Yes Yes, all the bad man you are good man!
I that beg you for something!?
I suggested that people make some effort to read and respond to the questions they did some kind of action and did not write 1000 posts for 4 months
If you are satisfied with writing 1000 messages, then I will close this topic !?

[Tyrantt]

*Just saying, I know all of us have our own businesses to attend to. But I'm seeing more members are engaged in flaming than helping.

I think I have seen an ICO with this type of concept I forget whats the project's name. Its an e-course to all cryptocurrency things. Not sure if the project was successful.

That's because new members are constantly opening the same topics for the 20th time, showing that they're not going through older topics unleast on the second page and that can get annoying.

I took this course, taught by a member of this forum, found it pretty good. 

https://www.udemy.com/blockchain-and-bitcoin-fundamentals/learn/v4/overview

Oh, nice. To be honest, didn't know someone already made a course. Is it worth? I might give it a go.

[greeklogos]

The idea sucks. You see, many people join the forum exactly to learn about crypto, Blockchain and kinds of businesses about all of that which can bring money. Well, I was such user. Before to join the forum I only heard about bitcoin and how much it is possible to earn on it's trading. Almost all of my first comments is just asking what and how, and I guess there are many users like me here.
I suppose such testing as you offer can awake new wave of forum's 'criminal', which is happening about Merit currently, I mean: trading of merit, creating groups which send merit to each other and so on.

Well, it's logical to write 900 posts in 2 months to ask? Here is an example that I encountered and that this information is useful to think about?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1416871

I'm not talking about in-depth knowledge, I'm talking about the initial knowledge that is needed

The idea to forbid to newbies and Jr. members to start new threads on the forum is more attractive to me. Someone suggested it long time ago. The point is to stay away from repeating of noob topics over and over again, coz that's what almost all newbies do. They are too lazy to surf the forum to see replies on all possible questions about crypto, instead they start a thread "what is bitcoin?" again and again; that makes the forum trashy. So the time while they can not start a new thread can be used for reading and introducing with the forum.

[Pancheng]

First is merit to ensure everybody will post quality lines, and spammers will not rank up their account now we have board exam to earn merit, but I don't hate the idea it self, since you can only join once and get merit depends on your test results, I guess it fine to test how far you've learn also on the forum.

[DdmrDdmr]

<...>

You proposal is for Jr. Members and upwards according to what you state, but then you contradict the terms by indicating that it would be useful for beginners and newcomers.

Regardless, your proposal would only enable test passing users to earn 1 sMerit according to your basis. Limited circular questions would no doubt lead to the questions being listed and published somewhere, and to become accessible beforehand to anyone with a bit of wits in them.

Best case scenario, everyone would earn 1 sMerit, making “1 the new 0”.

Can’t see the point of it.

[Lunarics]

<...>

You proposal is for Jr. Members and upwards according to what you state, but then you contradict the terms by indicating that it would be useful for beginners and newcomers.

Regardless, your proposal would only enable test passing users to earn 1 sMerit according to your basis. Limited circular questions would no doubt lead to the questions being listed and published somewhere, and to become accessible beforehand to anyone with a bit of wits in them.

Best case scenario, everyone would earn 1 sMerit, making “1 the new 0”.

Can’t see the point of it.

Well, if everything rests on merit, let's exclude this compound!
And we will do differently the beginner can not write messages until the moment the test passes, I understand that it is possible to write bots to train a neural network .... but there is clearly more people who want to understand what is crypto world, but in an forum i see spam and spam

That's fine at least somehow they something learn! And they will not create the 20 post by asking the same thing! Why the contradiction because it's a sketch