|
|
|
The Script
|
 |
July 31, 2011, 09:47:10 PM |
|
Two-dimensional compasses are so 19th Century, and very undependable. I choose the bright light of science to go where I will.
As a former Math Prof. of mine would say: "Well aren't you something!" |
|
|
|
|
|
myrkul
|
|
July 31, 2011, 09:48:34 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Script
|
|
July 31, 2011, 09:52:45 PM |
|
I know. I've failed the Fuehrer. I'm 2 grid points too low and to the left. |
|
|
|
|
|
myrkul
|
|
July 31, 2011, 09:58:56 PM |
|
Wait, What?!?
I know. I've failed the Fuehrer. I'm 2 grid points too low and to the left. That test is so full of fail. |
|
|
|
|
The Script
|
|
July 31, 2011, 10:04:22 PM |
|
Wait, What?!?
I know. I've failed the Fuehrer. I'm 2 grid points too low and to the left. That test is so full of fail. Ha ha, which is why I don't take them seriously. |
|
|
|
|
|
niemivh
|
|
August 24, 2011, 05:30:33 AM |
|
Charts like this are cute but don't deal in specifics so two people in the exact same spot on the chart could literally disagree on 80% of what they think should be done.
|
I'll keep my politics out of your economics if you keep your economics out of my politics.
16LdMA6pCgq9ULrstHmiwwwbGe1BJQyDqr
|
|
|
FlipPro
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1015
|
|
August 25, 2011, 01:53:28 AM |
|
Economic Left/Right: -3.75 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.10 Pretty accurate. Just gotta be honest with yourself, and the questions. Socially I am a socialist. Economically I feel that I am pretty centrist.  |
|
|
|
|
MatthewLM
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1004
|
|
August 25, 2011, 02:17:29 PM |
|
The test is stupid, very stupid. If lower on the graph represents higher civil liberties and more right respresents more economic liberties such as property rights then I'd go here:  |
|
|
|
|
FlipPro
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1015
|
|
August 25, 2011, 11:15:16 PM |
|
The test is stupid, very stupid. If lower on the graph represents higher civil liberties and more right respresents more economic liberties such as property rights then I'd go here: LOL  Then I think that chart is PRETTY accurately representing you... |
|
|
|
|
|
AyeYo
|
|
August 26, 2011, 01:47:21 AM |
|
HAHAHA! RIGHT ON THE MONEY! |
Enjoying the dose of reality or getting a laugh out of my posts? Feel free to toss me a penny or two, everyone else seems to be doing it! 1Kn8NqvbCC83zpvBsKMtu4sjso5PjrQEu1
|
|
|
|
The Script
|
|
August 26, 2011, 08:31:09 AM |
|
HAHAHA! RIGHT ON THE MONEY! I'm glad someone appreciates my attempt at humor? |
|
|
|
|
|
Nicolai Larsen
|
|
August 27, 2011, 08:25:00 AM |
|
|
BTC: 1GUH16sneWgKuE1ArXrnYKN3njuherJQi1
|
|
|
|
Vitalik Buterin
|
|
September 05, 2011, 11:27:38 AM |
|
The test is stupid, very stupid. If lower on the graph represents higher civil liberties and more right respresents more economic liberties such as property rights then I'd go here:
Not all people agree on what "economic liberties" are. For some people, their idea of economic liberty is what you call trespass. For some people, the right to monopolize the product of your intellectual labor is just as legitimate as the right to physical property, and they might even have a point - in terms of economic impact, sneaking into movie theaters (trespass) and copyright infringement for personal use can get scarily similar to each other. For other people, this same logic is why only consumptive use of someone else's property should constitute a property rights violation, and from there it's only two steps to Proudhonianism (lower left corner on this scale). |
Argumentum ad lunam: the fallacy that because Bitcoin's price is rising really fast the currency must be a speculative bubble and/or Ponzi scheme.
|
|
|
MatthewLM
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1004
|
|
September 05, 2011, 10:08:57 PM |
|
Freedoms to destroy freedoms can not cause freedom.
|
|
|
|
|
|
niko
|
|
September 07, 2011, 06:17:41 AM |
|
|
They're there, in their room.
Your mining rig is on fire, yet you're very calm.
|
|
|
|
Bind
|
|
September 07, 2011, 08:12:02 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
SuperTramp
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1073
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 07, 2011, 11:06:27 AM |
|
WOW, very nice !! You guys all got those colorful charts and what not. Mine just came back as text.
It said: "You Sir Are An ASSHOLE." "Please Do NOT Visit This Site Again."
WTF ?
O' well.
-ST
|
|
|
|
|
Vitalik Buterin
|
|
September 08, 2011, 12:50:54 PM |
|
Freedoms to destroy freedoms can not cause freedom.
The problem is that that's a circular argument. If you believe that being able to fence off any land you grab before anyone else is a freedom, then yes, trespass is a violation of that freedom. But what if you believe that the key freedom is the freedom to use whatever natural (ie. not other people's labor) resources you want? Then the fence becomes a violation of freedom. As long as there are multiple people who want to use the same resource it's necessary for all but one of the people to be blocked. Is it the first one to get to that particular resource that gets lucky? Is it the first one to build a fence around the area of nature that produces the resource? Does it depend on who has not taken their fair share of nature's production yet? Unless you can justify your theory as to what the "just coercion" is, then you have to accept that your theory is no better than anyone else's. |
Argumentum ad lunam: the fallacy that because Bitcoin's price is rising really fast the currency must be a speculative bubble and/or Ponzi scheme.
|
|
|
zmcmoto1
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
|
|
September 08, 2011, 04:13:57 PM |
|
Economic Left/Right: 0.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.21
Not worth much to me. For instance, if I believe abortion is always murder the test aligns me as authoritarian/right. I don't believe that stance is authoritarian because I see it as defending a person who can't defend their self rather than a protection of an individual's(the mother) rights. So what makes this test unreliable is that the test maker aligns answers with views different than the test taker intended the answer to mean.
|
|
|
|
|
|
