Bitcoin Forum
May 07, 2024, 12:11:34 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: how far is the proper definition for the "coin"?  (Read 144 times)
charlie137 (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 1204
Merit: 220


(ノಠ益ಠ)ノ


View Profile WWW
April 02, 2018, 05:32:33 AM
 #1

just finished reading fresh writeup from https://www.coindesk.com/owe-irs-crypto-crypto-trades/?utm_content=buffer7d164&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer

somewhere in the middle i caught myself on complete dead end, trying to understand current classifications. but it feels like basic approach for the btc classification is failing at its foundation. cryptocurrency from the look of the backend code - is not what common user thinks. first you generate electricity. then you convert it into hash power. then you using hash power to move blocks on the chain, being rewarded for resources you spent for the task. just like petroleum (from the perspective of human species, its unlikely we will give this planet a chance to generate some of it again - so this is very close to btc supply limit) - coins are fossil fuel for the blockchain. am i getting it right?
Make sure you back up your wallet regularly! Unlike a bank account, nobody can help you if you lose access to your BTC.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715083894
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715083894

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715083894
Reply with quote  #2

1715083894
Report to moderator
paulmaritz
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 672
Merit: 274



View Profile
April 03, 2018, 08:30:46 PM
 #2

Important differences as per legal definitions. In short:

Coin = Government and/or central bank issued currency and/or money in the form of coins. Known as "legal tender" - must be accepted when offered as payment.

Token = Privately/publicly issued. Not issued by government or central bank. Not deemed "legal tender" - don't have to be accepted when offered as payment.

Thus, by using the terms "coin" or "coins" in reference to cryptos, we don't strengthen our legal case. The authorities will simply claim in court that we market, sell or support something that isn't legal tender - as legal tender. It boils down to fraud and more that they could potentially use against us.

Yet, I have seen that most people in this space simply don't care, despite the fact that the terms they use give the authorities ample ammunition to use against us.
charlie137 (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 1204
Merit: 220


(ノಠ益ಠ)ノ


View Profile WWW
April 05, 2018, 02:28:14 PM
Last edit: April 05, 2018, 02:39:54 PM by charlie137
 #3

To my knowledge yeah you are getting it right. In fact you have described it pretty easy. But in the end, I’m not sure, probably you meant to say – Blockchain is fossil fuel to Coins, right?

i think cryptocurrency itself looks similar to oil. limited supply, price spread is huge. so maybe new classification for the market will help regulate it more efficiently and create safer environment.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!