Bitcoin Forum
December 13, 2024, 09:29:46 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Benefits for bounties!  (Read 199 times)
Potato18 (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 11


View Profile
April 03, 2018, 12:57:24 PM
Last edit: July 19, 2018, 07:58:36 AM by Potato18
 #1

In this topic plan to publish the usefulness of Bounty, if the topic is "will visit" the forum.


experience with bounty managers and participation statistics

1. Sergei.Gerasimenko
The Manager's not stressful. So as Russian-any question decide what. Plus honest, he himself put 0 in the subscription campaign TWN for non-compliance (he told me about it). Obvious plus that he believes Stuckey weekly. Campaigns are generally not bad. Here is only benches slip and weak campaign. There is a small minus that after sending to maidens of reports "throws" campaign on gravity, plus can close a branch. It's uncomfortable, because they Bautista further in the thread, you can publish the news from the Devas on payments and listing. But to honor Sergei, the branches are often asked to close the developers themselves. Replies in this topic.
There is his chat - https://t.me/internationalbountygroup

Campaign statistics:
1. banner.su (BNR) is not collected
2. wordcoin.io (WORD) - paid 243 tokens at ICO prices $ 243 (TW+FB)
3. herocoin.io (HERO) – paid 48780 tokens at the prices of ICO 3,9 ETH (TW+FB)
4. alloy.rewards.network (ALLOY) – paid 1704 tokens at ICO prices of$ 760, but the ICO itself was not, tokens can not be sold. Scum (TW+FB)
5. cottagecoin.io (CTG) is not collected, will be further developed, no payments (TW+FB)
6. ico.theworldnews.net (TWN – - active
7. providence - not paid yet (not participated)
8. qycbar-active (not participating)



2. deadley
There where was no problems. To correspond to the PM was not necessary. Judging by the branches of a bounty, no claims to him there from Bautista. Counts Stuckey weekly. Campaign until satisfied, cents were not. There are assistant - ubercool, but most likely it's his cartoon, because when you write degli, the cart can answer uber. Plus a friend asked me to throw merit points will be removed for that adopted in the campaign translations.
There channel - https://t.me/deadleybounty - post there Refco, not too much

Campaign statistics:
1. kickico.com (KICK – - paid 16907 tokens at ICO 5,6 ETH (TW+FB)
2. micromoney.io (AMM) – paid 350 tokens, according to the ICO prices of$ 350 (TW+FB), also the campaign was led by Xenia, there would be infa
3. ins.world (INS) - not yet paid (TW+FB)
4. kryll.io (KLR – - active
5. ntok.io (Ntok – - active
6. theabyss.com (ABYSS) - active
7. electroneum-originated problems and still not all paid (not participated)

3. Colorlessk
The opinion formed of him is twofold. Very tight replies. In a campaign marked ACC FB as a fake, has written to the PM in a few weeks he apologized and changed. The conditions are always simple – do regular reposts (if not, then the posts). How regularly I didn't know, but they do on weekdays, has always counted. Stuckey thinks every few weeks, we don't need reports. Usually problems do not arise. But there are abandoned campaign, where the answer can not wait, for example-Minerva. Made its portal for bounty https://bountyhive.io~. Maybe convenient, but I don't like armchair bounty, as it is not visible to General tables in them. Campaigns jump, where something bold somewhere penny

Campaign statistics:
1. stox.com (STX – - paid 114 tokens at ICO 0,57 ETH (FB+TW)
2. soma.co (SCT) – paid 603 token, the prices of 1.34 ICO ETH (TW+FB)
3. internxt.io (INXT) is a 700 tokens paid at prices ICO 2,3 ETH (TW+signature). The project gave a lot of x's
4. esports.com (ERT – - paid 433 tokens at ICO prices of $ 389 (TW+FB)
5. lucyd.co (LCD) - active
6. minerva.com (OWL) - active, likely Scam
7. kora.network-active, Cabinet (not participating)
8. iconic-active, Cabinet (not participate)
9. familypoints.io-active, Cabinet (not participate)
10. skychain.global-active, Cabinet (not participating)
11. bitcoinus.io-active, Cabinet (not participate)
12. pindify.com - active Cabinet (not involved)
13. sp8de.com -active (not participating)
It will be interesting to see the result of his Desk campaigns


from comments
Replies progress has been slow. So often answered you in the telegram of the project send a quick Hello they say where is the Manager and why not answering questions)) From here.

4. Sylon
At once a plus and a minus – he always subscribed to a high percentage of the bounty pool, but for small TV, and FB do not. Plus in TV reports and he said once a month or less, so if the retweets fly, then he does not pay. The topics respond in the PM too. Problems particularly not controversial of. But it happens stupidly throws the campaign, and not responding, for example rpay – wrote that is unable to communicate with the virgins and more, the participants continued to carry the signature and write it in the thread. In subscription usually takes from full. Articles on Russian not accepts, on articles limited the number of participants.

Campaign statistics:
1. rpay.io (RTK) is a Scam
2. spectre.ai-paid 2 types of tokens in the amount of about $ 700 is only for Twitter, the signatories received a lot
3. tokensale.gizer.io - not yet paid
4. torqall.com -not yet paid

from comments
Not "high", he's just tired of answering the same to a greater number of upright, but not thinking. At the end of each reporting week the same thing.
the last time was very good pomenyala bounty. Was good on subscription.

5. BlockEye
One of the most stressful and arrogant managers. Often changes the rules or makes any changes in the course of the campaign, as a result, many do not pay if they miss these updates. Had a bunch of forms, where he needs to send some problems. Counts is not always true and not correct. Can throw them campaign for the issues to him, supposedly distracting. Reports only on FB. Twitter thinks for itself, but if you do not fly tweets, can get a depth of 3000 tweets.
Have chat https://t.me/joinchat/FdzdexDi4v1DEuh5sVb2bg

Campaign statistics
1. hedge-crypto.com (HEDGE – - paid 169 tokens, at ICO prices 0.33 ETH (TW+FB)
2. ico.salpay.com (SAL – - paid 720 tokens, at ICO price 288 $ (TW+FB)
3. ditcoin.io - not yet paid
4. adbank.network-paid 34639 tokens at the prices of ICO 1,12 ETH (TW+FB)

6. irfan_pak10
A Manager that many people don't like. In its campaigns are usually a penny. Replies rarely. I was able to count my subscription only after the translator of the Russian branch was able to reach him at my request. And so he ignored me. It is a huge minus to his Cabinet (though someone like armchair bounty). Firstly, they are constantly buggy and can not count your actions, secondly, there are no common tables and you do not know how many people are involved and how much you can get with bounty. His campaigns are always unhappy. Report no, stacks are awarded to the offices immediately. I don't work with him anymore.

Campaign statistics
1. startmining.com Scam
2. indorse.io (IND) – paid 25 tokens for $ 7.5 at the rate of ICO (TW+FB)
3. daoact.org (SDAO) - paid six months later (all this time the Manager ignored the branch) 100 tokens (TW+FB)
4. dovu.io (DOV) - paid 1,356 tokens, at the prices of ICO 0,43 ETH (TW+FB + signature), I got the rules because of the signature, but the rest of the penny

from comments
Offices adjusted the, now work much faster, until calculations are correct. Of course were problems with old "version of the" cabinets, but Stuckey on FB then recovered.
I agree all that long, but he and his team are constantly updating the portal, and I think that is his portal. Communicate with him only in the cart, sometimes for two days respond)) If you are in the companies that he leads, closely monitor his listings, and then you can stay with nothing.

7. jamalaezaz
Another not a favorite the Manager. And there is the opinion that Irfan's cartoon Jamal, plus Jamal still has cartoons. Well related to Jamal can see his trust, it is unlikely that this Akka it will be anywhere Manager. Reports are not needed, says at the end, usually get pennies. Works very long. Pays almost all the same, the only difference is how the week went for him in the campaign. Was office and in the bounty he had, with rooms similarly as Irfan, working through times tables, etc. no Reply does not like to fix anything not love, not work like. He showed the curves of the article, and it still counted. I don't work with him anymore. Although there have been campaign - exchangeunion.net that threw Bautista, but he managed to convince the developers and they paid the missing in the air after a couple of months. He is also involved in the bounty of the translations.

Campaign statistics:
1. exchangeunion.net (XUC) – paid 10% of the pool-26 tokens, then another 2 ETH.
2. anacoin.io (ANAT) – paid 55 000 tokens at the prices of ICO 1100$ (TW+FB + article)
3. bitjob.io (STU) - paid 78 tokens, at ICO prices 0.087 ETH (TW+FB)
4. Bobsrepair - active (he was not involved)

8. yahoo62278
The Manager, to participate have which want all. The advantage is the limits on the participants, which usually result in consistently good payments. Subscription holds in the cue ball, but they do not pay much. Replies rarely. Yet there is a caveat that despite the fact that the campaign limits, it does not close the table. As a result, participants register and work for free. There is an opinion that makes it special. The DT2 therefore, it is better not to mess up if entered in the blacklist, it will be harder to work with, and even trust can be painted. Very rarely is there a FB campaign. Reports should be sent to the form. Counts weekly. There are assistant - Raymond541, he often makes contact, but not in all its branches seen.

Campaign statistics:
1. aion.network – AION) - paid 160 tokens for$ 160 at ICO prices, but the project shot and gave the IRS (TW)
2. vlb.io (VLB) - paid 400 tokens at ICO 0,67 ETH (FB)
3. indahash.com - not yet paid
4. fastinvest.com – not yet paid, most likely Scam

from comments
Yahoo is good but arrogant. There are cool projects, but he never answers a PM. His assistant answers in one go. Two times I was almost counted and not counted for a couple of hundred dollars.  I wrote back saying that you are wrong, and so on. He sees that he may have fucked up but the answer was: if not credited it means you did something against the rules)) I do Not want to sort things out because the tables were transferred and I understand that has no purpose.

9. Mr. cryptos
While he participated in a small number of his campaigns. But the opinion is positive. In that what was involved was not a problem, straining also. Reports there is. Stuckey counts weekly. Like how he responds to each report in the topic where something is wrong. So he took the job and why.

Campaign statistics:
1. extracredit.io (XTRA) - active
2. aidcoin.co (AID) is paid 1250 tokens at prices of 1.25 ETH ICO (TW+FB)
3. amon.tech-active

10. aTriz
Also on the list DT2, close friends with Laudau, so don't mess up, otherwise you paint it. Participated in a small number of campaigns, but do not particularly like. He paused, and this project has 2 branches bounty, one leads, it developers, later wrote that the virgin not be contacted. A second campaign was extended for an indefinite period. Reports in form. Counts weekly.

Campaign statistics:
1. dencity.life-active, most likely Scam
2. credito.io-active
3. tv-two.com -active (not participating)
4. realcasino.io-active (not participating)
5. grondigital.com -active (not participating)
6. capdax.com -active (not participating)
7. moonlite.io-active (not participating)

from comments
He's some sort of eternal stamina. The that he with Lauda in good this Yes. He was accused of a hundred times that his dick knows how many toons on the forum. Counts as finished. I went to a company last week and I felt much the same amount of people that are there for three months)) Stupid all exactly) well This is it-led project Scam Confidential. The last project of his is also some murky was and he wrote back that he was leaving the project because he had time for it. Although it was stamina in the end.
have aTriz 2 Scam know is confidential and is being rock miner, because he is good not afraid to take something and trust him do not paint.

Here's an analysis of 10 bounty managers from which I participated in bounty. I hope the information was useful to you and you will appreciate it +Merit Wink
Trader44
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 294
Merit: 3


View Profile
April 03, 2018, 01:03:39 PM
 #2

And? Where is your opinion?
Sigmas55
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 36

Telegram:@sigmas55


View Profile
April 03, 2018, 01:06:24 PM
 #3

The only thing I understood in this thread was the managers’ names  Roll Eyes
Potato18 (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 11


View Profile
April 03, 2018, 01:07:39 PM
 #4

And? Where is your opinion?
This is my opinion about these managers
Arwinkim
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 10


View Profile WWW
April 03, 2018, 02:09:29 PM
 #5

You simply quoted the original poster only. Where is your opinion? I don't find it useful personally. Unlike me, I hope others can take benefit from this thread
alexrums
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 283


View Profile
April 04, 2018, 06:51:48 AM
 #6

For what the entire this list? Everyone knows where to take part and without a list.
I will reveal one secret-good or bad managers do not happen. There are stupid rules in the company or normal rules, that's all.
escalante28
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 742
Merit: 42


View Profile
April 10, 2018, 03:57:24 AM
 #7

How about NeedMoney? any Background about him?
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!