Bitcoin Forum
May 11, 2024, 03:06:24 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: the IMF suggests a 10% cut on "private wealth" !!  (Read 870 times)
600watt (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2338
Merit: 2106



View Profile
November 05, 2013, 12:02:38 AM
 #1

the ultimate bitcoin chart rocket:

(hint: get out of your fiat and into bitcoin asap  Wink)


Quote
Box 6. a One-Off Capital Levy?
The sharp deterioration of the public finances in many countries has revived interest in a “capital levy”— a one-off tax on private wealth—as an exceptional measure to restore debt sustainability.1 The appeal is that such a tax, if it is implemented before avoidance is possible and there is a belief that it will never be repeated, does not distort behavior (and may be seen by some as fair). There have been illustrious supporters, including Pigou, Ricardo, Schumpeter, and—until he changed his mind—Keynes. The conditions for success are strong, but also need to be weighed against the risks of the alternatives, which include repudiating public debt or inflating it away (these, in turn, are a particular form of wealth tax—on bondholders—that also falls on nonresidents).
1 As for instance in Bach (2012).
There is a surprisingly large amount of experience to draw on, as such levies were widely adopted in Europe after World War I and in Germany and Japan after World War II. Reviewed in Eichengreen (1990), this experience suggests that more notable than any loss of credibility was a simple failure to achieve debt reduc- tion, largely because the delay in introduction gave space for extensive avoidance and capital flight—in turn spurring inflation.
The tax rates needed to bring down public debt to precrisis levels, moreover, are sizable: reducing debt ratios to end-2007 levels would require (for a sample of 15 euro area countries) a tax rate of about 10 percent on households with positive net wealth.2
2 IMF staff calculation using the Eurosystem’s Household Finance and Consumption Survey (Household Finance and Consumption Network, 2013); unweighted average.

http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fm/2013/02/pdf/fm1302.pdf#page=59


ath will get dwarfed.


edit: credit to paul2000 who posted https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=26136.msg3483505#msg3483505
If you see garbage posts (off-topic, trolling, spam, no point, etc.), use the "report to moderator" links. All reports are investigated, though you will rarely be contacted about your reports.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715439984
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715439984

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715439984
Reply with quote  #2

1715439984
Report to moderator
StarenseN
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2478
Merit: 1362



View Profile
November 05, 2013, 12:12:09 AM
 #2

1 month old scoop.
Qoheleth
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 960
Merit: 1028


Spurn wild goose chases. Seek that which endures.


View Profile WWW
November 05, 2013, 01:43:29 AM
 #3

and there is a belief that it will never be repeated
After Cyprus?

If there is something that will make Bitcoin succeed, it is growth of utility - greater quantity and variety of goods and services offered for BTC. If there is something that will make Bitcoin fail, it is the prevalence of users convinced that BTC is a magic box that will turn them into millionaires, and of the con-artists who have followed them here to devour them.
antimattercrusader
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 250



View Profile
November 05, 2013, 06:25:11 PM
 #4

"10 percent on households with positive net wealth"

Positive net wealth? It's funny how those who manage their money correctly pay for those who don't.

Remind me to never have a positive net wealth per se.

BTC: 13WYhobWLHRMvBwXGq5ckEuUyuDPgMmHuK
Phinnaeus Gage
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918
Merit: 1570


Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending


View Profile WWW
November 05, 2013, 08:22:59 PM
 #5

"10 percent on households with positive net wealth"

Positive net wealth? It's funny how those who manage their money correctly pay for those who don't.

Remind me to never have a positive net wealth per se.

Anybody can have a zero or negative net wealth. Ask GE.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!