Oh come on! Let us not fall for these dirty tactics. We all know this is PURELY business. Of course, Ethereum creator would always make abuzz about anything that has to do with Bitcoin MAINLY because Bitcoin is STILL number one in terms of its popularity, transactions and value.
That doesn't change the fact that Craig is not the creator of Bitcoin!
I am just wondering, though, whether Ethereum founder meant Craig Wright a fraud or Bitcoin a fraud? Or does his statement connote both? Nevertheless, I think these accusations are baseless and are purely matters of business strategy.
Are you for real? He's using Satoshi's name to make himself popular. If he was the founder there were numerous things that he could do. He could for instance sign the message with the coins from the genesis block, but he can't do that because he's not the one. He could also prove that he's the owner of Satoshi's bitcointalk account, but he also can't do that. Craig shouldn't be allowed to speak until he either backs out and apologizes or proves that he's the one. I'm with Vitalik on this one, liars like him should not be taken seriously and allowed to manipulate the community.