My negative trust still sticking

[ripplehd1]

Bump i want to get to the bottom of this. Seems like ive been lied to on here.

The only one getting lied is you by inflicting yourself with your own lies
Those red trust are well deserved with clear reason and reference, I'm not sure what part of yours that don't understand that

Red trust from account selling or buying are rarely, if not, never removed.
Lauda are basically annoyed with your PMs

i dont believe what you are saying about Lauda

[yogg]

Why on earth do you ask people giving services for free to make stuff for other people without event knowing if they need something ?
What do you want me to do with this avatar "you made for me" ?

The worse is that you take advantage of free offers and give all the credit to yourself.
I disapprove of your behaviour.

[ripplehd1]

Why on earth do you ask people giving services for free to make stuff for other people without event knowing if they need something ?
What do you want me to do with this avatar "you made for me" ?

The worse is that you take advantage of free offers and give all the credit to yourself.
I disapprove of your behaviour.

i am very sorry i just thought i'd help you out by promoting you.

[yogg]

The worse is that you take advantage of free offers and give all the credit to yourself.
I disapprove of your behaviour.

i am very sorry i just thought i'd help you out by promoting you.

Well, you thought wrong then.
Thanks for your help, but no, I don't need it, thanks.

[ripplehd1]

Bump

[actmyname]

Bump

Why do you think your negative trust should be removed when you yourself are also tagging users for selling/buying accounts? And then the same thing with giving Timelord negative trust for not having done a deal with you... whereas you tagged Etshy without having traded with them.Also added a fresh new tag for you.

[Sellingaccs]

Guys stop bullying ripplehd1! He is a troubled young man clearly, and not the brightest one.
Go pick on someone of your own size 

But really, you are dumb enough to engage on shady behavior, even on your main account and then crying about it here.
Sometimes people deserve a 2nd chance, but you won't as you have been harassing some members (like Lauda) via PM's which gives them even less reasons to even listen you out. Why won't you do something useful on this forum, like for example help people instead of whining and maybe getting a second chance?

You already lost, if you had just done something useful after getting red tagged instead of crying, well maybe then you could actually have green now.

My reply in a nutshell: OP is a whining shitposter.

[teddy5145]

I dont believe what you are saying about Lauda

We'll see

i am very sorry i just thought i'd help you out by promoting you.

By stealing other's people work by claiming it as yours?
That is shady enough for me to left -neg
P.S. I know you are expecting a postivie trust by "creating" an avatar for him, I've dealt with your kind before

My reply in a nutshell: OP is a whining shitposter.

He's just going to bump the topic again, trust me

[shahzadafzal]

Bitcoin Talk account trading seems to be an area that gets most people into trouble with trust ratings. I can't see any reason for doing it, unless you are intending to cheat Bitcoin Talk members, or the forum. Isn't it time we made it a breach of the rules to sell and/or buy accounts?

I'm not if there is any check on this...
but what if someone gives you negative trust without a reason?
Like in this case he has been given negative trust from same user "Lauda" twice?

[suchmoon]

Bitcoin Talk account trading seems to be an area that gets most people into trouble with trust ratings. I can't see any reason for doing it, unless you are intending to cheat Bitcoin Talk members, or the forum. Isn't it time we made it a breach of the rules to sell and/or buy accounts?

I'm not if there is any check on this...
but what if someone gives you negative trust without a reason?
Like in this case he has been given negative trust from same user "Lauda" twice?

The OP has a multiple neg feedbacks with references. How is that "without a reason"?

You can disagree with the given reasons but that's another story.