Azizbrothers (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 18
Merit: 1
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 05, 2018, 10:22:29 AM |
|
Hi , I have a good catch here This guy send merit to his alt Suspects:
1- MankeenUsed this wallet 0xdda03a2E46FbB97303350455ac842C2C49306654 in this post Click - here https://i.imgur.com/Mb94JPj.png And this Click - herehttps://i.imgur.com/Cp1dGDF.png2- Mr.CoinzerUsed this wallet 0xBB9cd47E267f7Bf7AB6da394Ff0CaA8EaE810BFc In this post https://i.imgur.com/GBgNzeV.pngAnd this wallet : 0xA681C50E167ae4546257B60B6e4e87abF318dA32 In this posthttps://i.imgur.com/MtvaMHT.png3- CryptoNine : no evidence yet merit summary for Mankeenhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=680704 Mr.Coinzer sent merit to Mankeen And Mankeen sent merit to CryptoNine and CryptoNine sent merit to Mr.CoinzerMankeen sent 32 merit to CryptoNine for this reply! بالضبط ما هو استخدام بلوكشين للمشروع، وما هو الحل هو أنه يجلب أو ما هي المشكلة هو تحديد، ما هي قيمة أنها جلب إلى كريبتو. Translation:Exactly what is the use of Blockchain for the project, and what solution is it brings or what problem is determining, what value they bring to crypto.
Yes it is 32 ! for shitty postCryptoNine gives 17 merit to Mr.Coinzer for this replyقبل 9 سنوات، بيتكوين بدأت على فكرة مماثلة لجعل المعاملات أكثر كفاءة والباقي هو التاريخ. ولكن توكن بيتكوين يختلف في حقيقة أنه في حين أنه يهدف إلى جعل المعاملات أكثر كفاءة، بل هو أيضا عملة مجتمعية.
Translation 9 years ago, Bitcoin started a similar idea to make transactions more efficient and the rest is history. But Bitcoin is different in the fact that while it aims to make transactions more efficient, it is also a community coin.
And Finally , Mr.Coinzer gives merit to MankeenI think the 3 accounts are for the same person And here is the proof from Ether scan Mankeen: 0xdda03a2E46FbB97303350455ac842C2C49306654 Mr.Coinzer: 0xBB9cd47E267f7Bf7AB6da394Ff0CaA8EaE810BFc 0xA681C50E167ae4546257B60B6e4e87abF318dA32 Etherscan Txn 1Etherscan Txn 2Etherscan Txn 33 transaction for Mankeen and Coinzer Wallets Mankeen- 0xdda03a2E46FbB97303350455ac842C2C49306654 Mr.Coinzer - 0xBB9cd47E267f7Bf7AB6da394Ff0CaA8EaE810BFc And Etherscan Txn 1Etherscan Txn 2Etherscan Txn 30xdda03a2E46FbB97303350455ac842C2C49306654 0xA681C50E167ae4546257B60B6e4e87abF318dA32
|
|
|
|
mdayonliner
Copper Member
Sr. Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 630
Merit: 420
We are Bitcoin!
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 05, 2018, 10:40:17 AM |
|
Good one.. Please quote the thread on this post 11 CASES so far: Merit farming/trading. I will tag the users with red trust even if any DT member do the same or not.
|
Be happy be at peace. Looking forward to BTC at $1M
|
|
|
Azizbrothers (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 18
Merit: 1
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 05, 2018, 10:51:39 AM |
|
Done , we are waiting for DT member to red tag this law breakers . Also , local sections are lack of DT members i think it is better to Add DT members in local sections
|
|
|
|
maeusi
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 05, 2018, 10:59:31 AM |
|
If I remember right, DT members are not interested anymore in tagging alt meriters.
|
|
|
|
LoyceV
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3430
Merit: 17348
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 05, 2018, 11:01:43 AM |
|
Done , we are waiting for DT member to red tag this law breakers . I can't find back the link, but as far as I know theymos disapproves of red trust for merit abuse. Also, they didn't break any forum rules.
|
|
|
|
Azizbrothers (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 18
Merit: 1
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 05, 2018, 11:06:26 AM |
|
Done , we are waiting for DT member to red tag this law breakers . I can't find back the link, but as far as I know theymos disapproves of red trust for merit abuse. Also, they didn't break any forum rules. Can I give merit to my alt accounts?
No, this is frowned upon and will almost certainly lead to you receiving negative feedback if discovered. Look at this , Also hailariousanco tagged someone for sending merit to his Alt proved by Etherscan
|
|
|
|
maeusi
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 05, 2018, 11:11:28 AM |
|
Done , we are waiting for DT member to red tag this law breakers . I can't find back the link, but as far as I know theymos disapproves of red trust for merit abuse. Also, they didn't break any forum rules. Maybe you mean this one? So what are you proposing that be done against shady behavior regarding the merit system? Nothing? Or are you simply saying that *we could/should* tag them, but that some of the tag's by actmyname were unwarranted?
I think that tagging may be appropriate in particularly obvious cases, or particularly egregious cases involving hundreds of merit points and several posts. But generally you should start out by assuming good faith, and only change that opinion as the evidence really piles up. Tagging someone immediately after an instance of apparently-inexplicable meriting is too trigger-happy IMO. Even if it is a case of illegitimate merit, even hundreds of illegitimate merit points are not much of a problem IMO, so you have to ask whether it's worthwhile to possibly make a mistake by tagging someone who is merely suspicious. Now, I'm not 100% sure that actmyname's ratings are outside of what I would consider appropriate, which is why I didn't take action to immediately remove him. But from what I've seen, it does seem likely that he is too trigger-happy.
|
|
|
|
mdayonliner
Copper Member
Sr. Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 630
Merit: 420
We are Bitcoin!
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 05, 2018, 11:14:48 AM |
|
Done , we are waiting for DT member to red tag this law breakers . Also , local sections are lack of DT members i think it is better to Add DT members in local sections I also tagged all three with another new one while I was digging the rabbit hole.
|
Be happy be at peace. Looking forward to BTC at $1M
|
|
|
maeusi
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 05, 2018, 11:20:27 AM |
|
Done , we are waiting for DT member to red tag this law breakers . Also , local sections are lack of DT members i think it is better to Add DT members in local sections I also tagged all three with another new one while I was digging the rabbit hole. Done , we are waiting for DT member to red tag this law breakers . I can't find back the link, but as far as I know theymos disapproves of red trust for merit abuse. Also, they didn't break any forum rules. Maybe you mean this one? So what are you proposing that be done against shady behavior regarding the merit system? Nothing? Or are you simply saying that *we could/should* tag them, but that some of the tag's by actmyname were unwarranted?
I think that tagging may be appropriate in particularly obvious cases, or particularly egregious cases involving hundreds of merit points and several posts. But generally you should start out by assuming good faith, and only change that opinion as the evidence really piles up. Tagging someone immediately after an instance of apparently-inexplicable meriting is too trigger-happy IMO. Even if it is a case of illegitimate merit, even hundreds of illegitimate merit points are not much of a problem IMO, so you have to ask whether it's worthwhile to possibly make a mistake by tagging someone who is merely suspicious. Now, I'm not 100% sure that actmyname's ratings are outside of what I would consider appropriate, which is why I didn't take action to immediately remove him. But from what I've seen, it does seem likely that he is too trigger-happy. ... nevertheless I think, if evidence is clear, merit abusers should be tagged by DT-members, because those abusers take advantages (upranking, earning in merit based signature campaigns) against honest members in the forum. Maybe members, who still have sMerits, could merit also those, who uncover cheatings, like OP did.
|
|
|
|
virendarnagpal
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 672
Merit: 12
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 05, 2018, 12:31:56 PM |
|
I noticed several cases of this type, but never tried to report as these can not be claimed to be breaking of forum rules. Merits also awarded for just asking foolish question. Several such cases already reported by some members. But I think the sources almost dried up / drying up. Now getting any such merit will be very tough for them. It is very tough to get merit for serious members too. Only extra ordinary intelligent persons will promote to higher ranks.
|
|
|
|
Azizbrothers (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 18
Merit: 1
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 05, 2018, 08:45:50 PM |
|
Done , we are waiting for DT member to red tag this law breakers . Also , local sections are lack of DT members i think it is better to Add DT members in local sections I also tagged all three with another new one while I was digging the rabbit hole. Done , we are waiting for DT member to red tag this law breakers . I can't find back the link, but as far as I know theymos disapproves of red trust for merit abuse. Also, they didn't break any forum rules. Maybe you mean this one? So what are you proposing that be done against shady behavior regarding the merit system? Nothing? Or are you simply saying that *we could/should* tag them, but that some of the tag's by actmyname were unwarranted?
I think that tagging may be appropriate in particularly obvious cases, or particularly egregious cases involving hundreds of merit points and several posts. But generally you should start out by assuming good faith, and only change that opinion as the evidence really piles up. Tagging someone immediately after an instance of apparently-inexplicable meriting is too trigger-happy IMO. Even if it is a case of illegitimate merit, even hundreds of illegitimate merit points are not much of a problem IMO, so you have to ask whether it's worthwhile to possibly make a mistake by tagging someone who is merely suspicious. Now, I'm not 100% sure that actmyname's ratings are outside of what I would consider appropriate, which is why I didn't take action to immediately remove him. But from what I've seen, it does seem likely that he is too trigger-happy. ... nevertheless I think, if evidence is clear, merit abusers should be tagged by DT-members, because those abusers take advantages (upranking, earning in merit based signature campaigns) against honest members in the forum. Maybe members, who still have sMerits, could merit also those, who uncover cheatings, like OP did. i dont want to get merit , if they want us to follow rules , they should punish law breakers or the hole system will be useless , the evidence is clear and they dont even want to take action
|
|
|
|
Azizbrothers (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 18
Merit: 1
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 08, 2018, 04:48:23 PM |
|
pump
|
|
|
|
|