Nexybit, horrible rates, Self escrow and accepts bounty campaign (only) posters.

[ankylotic]

If you guys want to stop campaigns from being ran by the team its self, or want to stop worrying about the horrid rates, THEN STOP JOINING THE DAMN CAMPAIGNS THAT ARE DOING THIS.

If people don't sign up for the campaign then there will be no worries, but as you see there are hundreds of idiots on alt accounts willing to join about anything.

There is nothing wrong with a company running its own campaign, but they should at least escrow the campaign funds to make users confident they'll be paid. I don't think companies should run a campaign themselves, but we cannot stop that unless ppl just stop joining them.

If a company runs a campaign themselves, they allow almost any account to join, they can run without paying, they allow spam like crazy. If they hire a competent manager they at least show that they care about their rep a little and want things to run smooth. They show that participants will be paid.

Yeah agree that you guys shouldn't have to join such campaigns run by the project themselves or those campaigns that don't escrow funds because there is a a factor of doubt in it that either they will pay the campaign participants or not.

There are also some campaigns that that pays really low for promoting their signatures. I think we should also have to boycott those campaigns. Atleast old members like sr or hero should have to bycott them for themselves and for the betterment of this forum as well.

[1715545102]

1715545102

[1715545102]

1715545102

[1715545102]

1715545102

[1715545102]

1715545102

[1715545102]

1715545102

[Lauda]

If you guys want to stop campaigns from being ran by the team its self, or want to stop worrying about the horrid rates, THEN STOP JOINING THE DAMN CAMPAIGNS THAT ARE DOING THIS.

If people don't sign up for the campaign then there will be no worries, but as you see there are hundreds of idiots on alt accounts willing to join about anything.
-snip-

Well, those two statements contradict each other to some extent. If the people that are aware of this *issue* don't join the campaign(s), it will have next to no effect on it anyways. There are thousands of farmed accounts waiting in line.

[TianaStam]

I am a participant of this signature campaign. OP, do you count every user from this campaign as a spammer? Will every participant of this campaign is going to be marked as spammer?? Maybe it is better to me to go away...

[Sellingaccs]

I am a participant of this signature campaign. OP, do you count every user from this campaign as a spammer? Will every participant of this campaign is going to be marked as spammer?? Maybe it is better to me to go away...

That's not for me to decide, you should know this by yourself whether you are spamming or not. I just generally meant that their campaign accepts spammers as well as trashposters. You are not worst of them, but definetly could work out on your grammar as well as the content of your posts.

It's up to you whether you want to support such a campaign.

[greeklogos]

I am a participant of this signature campaign. OP, do you count every user from this campaign as a spammer? Will every participant of this campaign is going to be marked as spammer?? Maybe it is better to me to go away...

That's not for me to decide, you should know this by yourself whether you are spamming or not. I just generally meant that their campaign accepts spammers as well as trashposters. You are not worst of them, but definetly could work out on your grammar as well as the content of your posts.

It's up to you whether you want to support such a campaign.

By those posts that TS made I couldn't say that she is spammer, they are really girly  but the effort in the sense of quality of posting should be done or you will stay Member for a looooong time and any tea cups business will not help here 
2$ per week for such active posting, all those people who joined the campaign must be or insane or shitpostes!

[nexybit]

First of all, we appreciate your concern. There are a few points we would like to make on our side.

1. We do not know what you have against self-escrow. As long as the participants are paid as due, what other problem is there? We hope to continue a long campaign and therefore will always pay our participants. Though our account is a newbie due to our company being also new, the people behind it have been on this forum for a long while and have considerable experience with such campaigns.

Does not seem to be very professional to me. And you have completed payment now, so i guess self escrowing is fine. Why you could not post from your accounts tho, instead of making a new one? If you were so sure about your managing skills, you would have used your main account instead of making a new alt.

We made this account as a company account. Those other accounts were our personal accounts.

2. The example you gave about the bounty poster did not show the whole picture as that person did not change their signature and therefore was not a true participant.

Does not matter, you still accepted him. The difference is that he did not get paid because of his own mistake, and you would have paid the user anyway with the signature. Therefore IT DOES show the whole picture, and the capability of the person behind the campaign that how poorly managed campaign this is.

It does matter because as we stated above, we read each and every post made by our participants. Even if that person did not make that mistake and kept our signature, they would not have been paid because their posts would have been considered spam. Our whole response was

2. The example you gave about the bounty poster did not show the whole picture as that person did not change their signature and therefore was not a true participant. The person in charge of managing this campaign reads each and every post made by its participants and has so far not found any post notably "spammy". If there was anyone who posted such as the example you had given, we would have warned them that such posts do not qualify and would result in that person being cut. Also, we do not see a problem if the reason our participants post is for bounty as long as they do not spam or make posts that are negative to this forum.

Thank you for your opinion and concern.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

OP, there is absolutely no such thing as "self-escrow".  If you ever hear anyone telling you that they're going to escrow the deal themselves, whether it's a campaign manager or someone looking to buy $5 worth of bitcoin, run for the hills.

"Self-escrow" is a made-up term that you'll only see on this forum and nowhere else.  It's a term employed to scam people or to defend scammers who engage in such shady behavior.  A person you're trading with cannot also act as the escrow for the deal.  It's absurd on its face, so I'm not sure why it's not immediately a dead giveaway that a scam is happening. 

I didn't look at the link in the OP, but if Nexybit actually said they were "self-escrowing" the funds then that's scammy.  It sound more like they just didn't escrow the money at all.  There's a big difference, but the outcomes are often the same.

[muddy waters]

Perfect role model of a quality poster: https://archive.fo/RHmkS

Wow, I didn't even know that one could increase his signature campaign counter in a way like this.
Generally in bounties they say something like "only constructive posts with at least xxx words are accepted in xxx threads", which reduces the level of insignificant information generated by forum members.
It is also something new to me when they pay for posts in BTC, usually a certain number of stakes is given to a bounty participant.
Well, sad to say, but Nexybit seems to be another scam project.