Bitcoin Forum
June 15, 2024, 04:13:51 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Wow NANO Developers Get Hit With LAWSUIT Claiming They Profited Off of Hack!  (Read 104 times)
CryptoMedication (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 16
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 08, 2018, 10:37:34 AM
 #1

When I saw this story, I couldn't even believe it but everything checks out from the sources that they provide...It's definitely real. I'm just shocked and stunned man. Absolutely unbelievable.

Wow.

https://cryptoslate.com/nano-lawsuit/
AshCoins
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 102


View Profile
April 09, 2018, 12:53:11 AM
 #2

Pretty interesting saga.  Guess that helps explain why Nano is gradually descending down the ranks of the coinmarketcap elite. 
CryptoAllDay
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 578
Merit: 250


View Profile
April 09, 2018, 01:56:05 AM
 #3

Lots of drama behind this coin.  It was crazy to see its rise over the past few months, only to tumble afterwards to its current price point.  That being said, I don't know if this lawsuit will amount to anything, was it not the exchanges security fault for the hack?  While the Nano team did direct investors to that exchange, ultimately are they also responsible for the exchange itself?  Seems weird to me.
Jaslinbor28
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 10, 2018, 08:27:48 AM
 #4

I was also surprised seeing this. A very interesting news it is and maybe this will have remarkable effect on bitcoin.
kryptqnick
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3136
Merit: 1392


Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!


View Profile
April 10, 2018, 08:38:21 AM
 #5

I thought NANO was a pretty strong and legit project.
The story in the link is actually a bit confusing. Bitgrail exchange was hacked and people lost a lot of their NANO (worth $150 million). The owner of the exchange asked the NANO team to invoke a hard fork to solve the problem. They refused to do that and now some company is suing them for being irresponsible and not managing to keep the funds of their users safe, right?
Why is nobody suing Bitgrail?
NANO team is surely responsible for the losses of users, but the hack being profitable to them is just unconfirmed info, so they are worth giving the benefit of the doubt.
I wonder why Vitalik got over with the terrible Parity bug without initiating forks or compensating people...

  ▄▄███████▄███████▄▄▄
 █████████████
▀▀▀▀▀▀████▄▄
███████████████
       ▀▀███▄
███████████████
          ▀███
 █████████████
             ███
███████████▀▀               ███
███                         ███
███                         ███
 ███                       ███
  ███▄                   ▄███
   ▀███▄▄             ▄▄███▀
     ▀▀████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄████▀▀
         ▀▀▀███████▀▀▀
░░░████▄▄▄▄
░▄▄░
▄▄███████▄▀█████▄▄
██▄████▌▐█▌█████▄██
████▀▄▄▄▌███░▄▄▄▀████
██████▄▄▄█▄▄▄██████
█░███████░▐█▌░███████░█
▀▀██▀░██░▐█▌░██░▀██▀▀
▄▄▄░█▀░█░██░▐█▌░██░█░▀█░▄▄▄
██▀░░░░▀██░▐█▌░██▀░░░░▀██
▀██
█████▄███▀▀██▀▀███▄███████▀
▀███████████████████████▀
▀▀▀▀███████████▀▀▀▀
▄▄██████▄▄
▀█▀
█  █▀█▀
  ▄█  ██  █▄  ▄
█ ▄█ █▀█▄▄█▀█ █▄ █
▀▄█ █ ███▄▄▄▄███ █ █▄▀
▀▀ █    ▄▄▄▄    █ ▀▀
   ██████   █
█     ▀▀     █
▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄
▄ ██████▀▀██████ ▄
▄████████ ██ ████████▄
▀▀███████▄▄███████▀▀
▀▀▀████████▀▀▀
█████████████LEADING CRYPTO SPORTSBOOK & CASINO█████████████
MULTI
CURRENCY
1500+
CASINO GAMES
CRYPTO EXCLUSIVE
CLUBHOUSE
FAST & SECURE
PAYMENTS
.
..PLAY NOW!..
sunlitit654
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 10, 2018, 10:37:48 AM
 #6

As they said, "The NANO team refused to oblige to the exchange owner’s hard-fork request. This led to the ensuing standoff between the two parties in which each blamed the other’s negligence/competence for the loss of the NANO tokens." i don't know, things are weird for me in case of this coin.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!