Bitcoin Forum
May 14, 2024, 08:53:56 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: [2018-04-09] Swiss Regulations Are Driving ICOs Away  (Read 133 times)
vhiancs (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 15

--=oOo=--


View Profile
April 09, 2018, 08:02:46 AM
 #1

Swiss Regulations Are Driving ICOs Away

Ever since ICO mania exploded in early 2017, Switzerland has served as Europe’s de facto crowdsale launchpad. Financial authorities have welcomed crypto startups, and the likes of Tezos, Mysterium, and Arcblock have all heeded that call. Guidelines laid out by Switzerland’s Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA) in February were meant to add clarity for ICOs. Instead, they’ve had the opposite effect.

Anti-money laundering regulation gives rise to a range of due diligence requirements including the requirement to establish the identity of the beneficial owner and the obligation either to affiliate to a self-regulatory organisation (SRO) or to be subject directly to FINMA supervision. These requirements can be fulfilled by having the funds accepted via a financial intermediary who is already subject to the AMLA in Switzerland and who exercises on behalf of the organiser the corresponding due diligence requirements.
In plain English, this means that ICOs must use a Swiss company to perform KYC on all ICO participants, which is where the problems have started. With only a handful of companies in a position to perform such checks, these entities effectively hold a monopoly. The average cost for a KYC check ranges from between $0.6 to $2 within the ICO space – but Switzerland is an exception. Accredited bodies are charging up to $25 per check, leaving projects that have already made the decision to host their crowdsale in Switzerland in an awkward position.

source: https://news.bitcoin.com/swiss-regulations-are-driving-icos-away/
1715676836
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715676836

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715676836
Reply with quote  #2

1715676836
Report to moderator
1715676836
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715676836

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715676836
Reply with quote  #2

1715676836
Report to moderator
1715676836
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715676836

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715676836
Reply with quote  #2

1715676836
Report to moderator
There are several different types of Bitcoin clients. The most secure are full nodes like Bitcoin Core, which will follow the rules of the network no matter what miners do. Even if every miner decided to create 1000 bitcoins per block, full nodes would stick to the rules and reject those blocks.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715676836
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715676836

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715676836
Reply with quote  #2

1715676836
Report to moderator
Betwrong
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 3276
Merit: 2151


I stand with Ukraine.


View Profile
April 09, 2018, 08:58:31 AM
 #2

Swiss Regulations Are Driving ICOs Away

Ever since ICO mania exploded in early 2017, Switzerland has served as Europe’s de facto crowdsale launchpad. Financial authorities have welcomed crypto startups, and the likes of Tezos, Mysterium, and Arcblock have all heeded that call. Guidelines laid out by Switzerland’s Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA) in February were meant to add clarity for ICOs. Instead, they’ve had the opposite effect.

Anti-money laundering regulation gives rise to a range of due diligence requirements including the requirement to establish the identity of the beneficial owner and the obligation either to affiliate to a self-regulatory organisation (SRO) or to be subject directly to FINMA supervision. These requirements can be fulfilled by having the funds accepted via a financial intermediary who is already subject to the AMLA in Switzerland and who exercises on behalf of the organiser the corresponding due diligence requirements.
In plain English, this means that ICOs must use a Swiss company to perform KYC on all ICO participants, which is where the problems have started. With only a handful of companies in a position to perform such checks, these entities effectively hold a monopoly. The average cost for a KYC check ranges from between $0.6 to $2 within the ICO space – but Switzerland is an exception. Accredited bodies are charging up to $25 per check, leaving projects that have already made the decision to host their crowdsale in Switzerland in an awkward position.

source: https://news.bitcoin.com/swiss-regulations-are-driving-icos-away/

If that is true then definitely something should be done to change that. Regular ICO participants can't afford paying $25 for a KYC check. Or, even if they could, why would they do that when it's possible to pay from $0.6 to $2 in other places?

Switzerland has almost became the ICO capital of the world, but because of the greed of those accredited bodies who have the right to perform the KYC check in the country Switzerland now may quickly lose its leading position in the business.

.
.BLACKJACK ♠ FUN.
█████████
██████████████
████████████
█████████████████
████████████████▄▄
░█████████████▀░▀▀
██████████████████
░██████████████
████████████████
░██████████████
████████████
███████████████░██
██████████
CRYPTO CASINO &
SPORTS BETTING
▄▄███████▄▄
▄███████████████▄
███████████████████
█████████████████████
███████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
███████████████████████
█████████████████████
███████████████████
▀███████████████▀
█████████
.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!