Syria refugees can't be taken in the west because...

[B1tUnl0ck3r]

1. leftists and corporations flooded it already with mass importation from around the world.
2. ressources are scarces
3. first syrians, then lybians, then afghan, then somalis, then then then then.... wouldn't it be simpler to give their dictators everything we have (aka the entire west) a go there build there countries?
4. and then what? stake people on top of other people? the world in the west?
5. forget "international community" it's just a psy op of obama/ bush1 cia, they believed they would rules china

look at jack ma, contrary to our commercial AND financial leadership, he knows where he is from... he wasn't brainwashed... normal self made man... not a "manager" so called CEO (trick to get more money than the COO and CMO who get more than the officiers who get more than the directors who get more than the employees (finally it's the part time who really work... but those don't care, they know they don't have the access to the right golf course and even less the right paper)

it's a big club and you ain't in it... or something like this.

[1715062371]

1715062371

[1715062371]

1715062371

[Sithara007]

I don't understand why GCC nations such as Saudi Arabia and Qatar can't take any of these refugees. Most of these refugees are Sunni Arab, which is the native ethnic group in the GCC nations. Despite that, Saudi Arabia till now has taken less than 10 Syrian refugees and the other Arab nations haven't taken any of them. They are saying that they have given work visas for 200,000 Syrians. But what is the use of this work visa, when the adult men who get it can't being their wives and children along them?