No matter what people tell you is a "good" ICO, it is truly just their opinion. One must research ICO's thoroughly and evaluate what is "good" on their own. You could start out by reading on the project, does it have a plausible implementation strategy, does the idea sound like something that can be adopted by blockchain? It is also imperative to look into the development teams' qualifications and experience as a whole. In addition, social media presence and overall marketing abilities are other factors to consider. When you go on the ico's website does it look legitimate? Do their followers look/sound real or bought? Participating in bounty programs, as Benchti suggested, is also a good way to actively get involved in the ICO learning process.
All that said if you want to keep up with ICO's, sites like Listico.io or coinmarketplus.com are solid options. You can find about 30 more of these by checking out this article:
https://hackernoon.com/top-10-ico-listing-sites-ico-alert-679191242da0Additionally, feel free to read our short guide on ICO's on our blog:
http://bit.ly/ICOGuideCheers!
