{BitfuryASIC/BTCGuild} Hashrates Gap - 470GH noncerate vs. 420GH miningpool

[hdbuck]

Hello,

We are actually facing a gap between our noncerate and pool hashrates (470GH vs.420GH). Could anyone help us finding a way to reduce such gap?

We thought it might be because of our difficulty settings on BTC Guild:




Or our bitfury pool configuration:




Our hardware is 16 hcards (25GH/card tested) on a single mboard

and here is our stats on BTC Guild:




So yeah basically it is tested for 25GH/card so having more (424GH total) is very nice but it would be even better if it was closer to the noncerate hash rate.  


Thx!



PS: or could it be someone in the pool hijacking the difference for his own use?  

[1714779721]

1714779721

[1714779721]

1714779721

[1714779721]

1714779721

[1714779721]

1714779721

[vm1990]

is there any reason you using 3 worker names? if there on the same connection id suggest just using 1 using 3 might be using unnecessary bandwidth

[drgyoza]

is there any reason you using 3 worker names? if there on the same connection id suggest just using 1 using 3 might be using unnecessary bandwidth

We choose this configuration because it was the most efficient a few hours after start. Now we've directed the 3 ports to the same worker using 1 unique name as you suggested, the two rates seem stick closer indeed, sometimes it's reversed so as pool estimated rate is higher than noncerate... interesting ! Thanks for the advice

[vm1990]

your welcome happy its better for you