Bitcoin Forum
April 27, 2017, 09:02:09 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.14.1  [Torrent]. (New!)
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Is no anonimity a clue for getting mainstream?  (Read 701 times)
Hero Member
Offline Offline

Activity: 712

View Profile WWW
July 31, 2011, 12:34:42 PM

Discussion about anonimity: I understand that an enormous part of this actual comunity wants an untraceable paying method as to do what ever they want with no govern intervention, but at mainstreem merchants need real profiles and consumers cares not about using a traceable paying system. Press media fills it's mouth talking of this traceability as a flaw but i believe its must be seeas an oportunity of aceptance by consumers, merchants and laws. I believe that keep talking about anonimity will turn this currency only into a black market users atention.

Hero Member
Offline Offline

Posts: 1493326929

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Reply with quote  #2

Report to moderator
The Bitcoin network protocol was designed to be extremely flexible. It can be used to create timed transactions, escrow transactions, multi-signature transactions, etc. The current features of the client only hint at what will be possible in the future.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
Offline Offline

Activity: 1092

View Profile
July 31, 2011, 01:07:31 PM

I understand that an enormous part of this actual comunity wants an untraceable paying method

I'm ok with 'less traceable' and I suspect the general public will like where bitcoin fits in too.. 
ie It's traceability lies somewhere in between that of cash and creditcards.

That a government can use sophisticated correlation methods combined with a few subpoenas and cooperation with other governments, ISPs and bitcoin intermediaries to eventually track down the worst cases is probably going to be seen by many as a good thing.

Unless what you're doing is so serious that it warrants a decent amount of government resources to investigate - then the existing level of anonymity available is probably just fine for the average privacy-conscious individual.

It does seem that the media picks up on the semi-anonymity as if that's a flaw. That is probably because there have been many lazy descriptions of bitcoin as 'completely anonymous', even by community members who should know better.

It's plausible, but I'm not convinced that 'an enormous part of this actual community wants an untraceable paying method'.
When/if large bitcoin service providers (such as disappear with community members bitcoins - I bet many will be happy for there to be some trail for law enforcement to follow.

@electricwings   BM-GtyD5exuDJ2kvEbr41XchkC8x9hPxdFd
Pages: [1]
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!