Bitcoin Forum
November 10, 2024, 03:51:22 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: anymore extraordinary projects?  (Read 121 times)
KUMAR6 (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 71
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 15, 2018, 11:06:30 AM
 #1

 
Stock photography market is the most centralized that exist, agencies rule an enormous part of the industry and enjoying huge commissions. Those who don’t line up, are struggling behind and left alone in the battle. The fees charged for distribution are between the highest of all industries, up to 85% of sale price, which leaves photographers with only crumbs of the revenue.
 Creating an equitable distribution system is what Wemark all about and I am waiting for some more projects to do the same..
Saturday97
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 130
Merit: 100


View Profile
April 15, 2018, 01:09:21 PM
 #2

 
The current division is illogical. It’s hard to believe photographers have so little faith in their product that they are willing to sell it so cheaply.
Z-Chain
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 10


View Profile
April 15, 2018, 01:11:03 PM
 #3

 When marketplaces reach maximum size, they  charging higher fees and become the same lustful mediator they came to replace. 
Blockchain was created for sharing and promoting digital content in a revolutionary way, the relationship between creators and photo-agencies is one sided and sometimes even abusive. In order to empower a direct economy for digital assets we need to embrace Wemark’s new payment system, who rewards all parties involved in the creative process and changes a grim reality.
Nekroser
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 2


View Profile
April 15, 2018, 03:02:36 PM
 #4

To pay such a commission is not to respect yourself. It would be better to sell their works on their own and not use the services of such intermediaries. And the project is not bad. I myself participate in his bounty.
julian2000
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 14
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 15, 2018, 03:52:30 PM
 #5

up to 85% of revenue..! it's insane..   you need to be absolutely crazy giving up your art for this price..

so I guess I like Wemark now (!)
Aniwura
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 1


View Profile
April 15, 2018, 03:55:49 PM
 #6

They are not supposed to give their works out so cheaply. It is better they handle it themselves.
Z-Chain
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 10


View Profile
April 16, 2018, 07:47:27 AM
 #7

found a youtube video reviewing Wemark from yesterday..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=daTgThv0-Rc&feature=youtu.be
kingcrypto-the2nd
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 1


View Profile
April 16, 2018, 01:55:37 PM
 #8

yup lots of them ,yall have gotcha put down ur eyes  one tip product based.like otppay currently on ico
YNWA2806
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 398
Merit: 250


View Profile
April 16, 2018, 03:41:36 PM
 #9

It used to be that photographers needed an agency, just to publish their work..

Thanks to blockchain, Wemark is creating a new generation of photographers who are strong enough to sell their work on their own.

A refreshing project.
tonylewisverdu
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 28
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 16, 2018, 03:44:24 PM
 #10


Stock photography market is the most centralized that exist, agencies rule an enormous part of the industry and enjoying huge commissions. Those who don’t line up, are struggling behind and left alone in the battle. The fees charged for distribution are between the highest of all industries, up to 85% of sale price, which leaves photographers with only crumbs of the revenue.
 Creating an equitable distribution system is what Wemark all about and I am waiting for some more projects to do the same..


I read a lot with this wemark.. what does this project really about, is it photography in blockchain?

D203
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!