Kill Syrians because Syrians are killing Syrians...

[fritzwalter195]

War is money. It's unfortunate that the involve countries don't find ways to really end the war. When one war ends a new one starts, it is a vicious cycle and "We" can only watch the the players toy with people's lives.

That's not how it works, this is the case for the weapon industry and not goverment themselves. Being in a war is extremely hard and costly these days, you need to pay well thousands and thousands of soldiers, sustain them with weapons and supplies, buy extremely expensive warheads, manuntenance of army ships, vehicles and airplanes etc. With that, you gotta take care of public opinion and also of your enemy move, if the USA could they wold never engage this war, if there is any reason for the country to be envolved, it's certainly not just to suck dry public taxes and make your population really angry.

[1714129521]

1714129521

[Sithara007]

We are all know why the invation on suriah happens, OIL.. thats all. Chemical weapons are nothing more than just a made up by Uand other west country to provide "PEACE" in suriah.. just what like they did to LYBIA, in this suriah case, there is no difference. and again, the victims will be the syrians people itself.. thanks to the "world's peace keeper" LOL!

There is no logic to claim that Assad's forces used chemical weapons. They would have used it if they were losing the battle. But here, they were winning the battle and the rebels were almost exterminated from central Syria. Why should they use chemical weapons under such circumstances?

[tvbcof]

We are all know why the invation on suriah happens, OIL.. thats all. Chemical weapons are nothing more than just a made up by Uand other west country to provide "PEACE" in suriah.. just what like they did to LYBIA, in this suriah case, there is no difference. and again, the victims will be the syrians people itself.. thanks to the "world's peace keeper" LOL!

There is no logic to claim that Assad's forces used chemical weapons. They would have used it if they were losing the battle. But here, they were winning the battle and the rebels were almost exterminated from central Syria. Why should they use chemical weapons under such circumstances?

Maybe he 'hates our freedoms.'

[criza]

Whatever reason it is, I don't think that another killing can resolve a previous killing matter. The reason why you agree to kill Syrians is because they are killing another Syrians. If you are into the fight for the Syrians who are killed, then why you should fight to kill? Isn't it ironic that you were bothered on the killings in Syria but you are not bothered to kill someone? Yes, it is true that the good it can bring is that, the killings will stop if you are about to kill also the killers. However, do you really think that killers were already gone by the time you kill them all knowing that you yourself became a killer? Let us all remember that we cannot attain peace at war. We cannot get happiness and love from hatred. Negative acts will only bear negative things. I won't and will never bring positive effects.

[Vishnu.Reang]

6 years have passed since the civil war in Syria began. The players have changed, but the suffering and death still remains. And now the things are getting worse, after foreign powers such as the United States and Turkey are directly interfering in the war.

[Sithara007]

We are all know why the invation on suriah happens, OIL.. thats all. Chemical weapons are nothing more than just a made up by Uand other west country to provide "PEACE" in suriah.. just what like they did to LYBIA, in this suriah case, there is no difference. and again, the victims will be the syrians people itself.. thanks to the "world's peace keeper" LOL!

There is no logic to claim that Assad's forces used chemical weapons. They would have used it if they were losing the battle. But here, they were winning the battle and the rebels were almost exterminated from central Syria. Why should they use chemical weapons under such circumstances?

Maybe he 'hates our freedoms.'

If the intention of the United States (and its allies) is to bring freedom to the middle-east, then they should first topple the monarchy in Saudi Arabia. The Saudis are not only oppressing their own citizens, but they are also funding terrorism all over the world including Syria and other middle-eastern nations.

[Sukarjo]

Real violence there does not happen if all parties can muffle themselves. But there are many interests contested, one of them to control oil. The civil war between Sunni and Shiite is very difficult to reconcile, there is no other way against this must be with violence as well

[Michaiah]

Many of them are motivated by money, from evil someone, someone is pushing them to be in this kind of situation, the problem I think is that only few countries are willing to help to stop this killing and war issue in this place.

[Dominic_Johnson]

Where's the logic of that?!  
And what good can it do?!

In that simple statement alone there's not much logic. The US and Russia go to Syria under the pretense of saving the world from terrorists. Of course, that seems quite unlikely. The real reason is that somebody has their own interests over there. They want to exploit the resources and distract citizens of their own countries from the ridiculous things happening domestically. Then there's the people selling weapons and ammunition. They was as many wars as they can so the governments keep buying weapons from them.

[tvbcof]

Maybe he 'hates our freedoms.'

If the intention of the United States (and its allies) is to bring freedom to the middle-east, then they should first topple the monarchy in Saudi Arabia. The Saudis are not only oppressing their own citizens, but they are also funding terrorism all over the world including Syria and other middle-eastern nations.

The suggestion that the United States give two fucks about 'freedom', 'peace', and 'democracy' in the Middle East, or in almost any other part of the world is a sick joke to anyone who is paying even a little bit of attention.  Unless, of course, they only pay attention to certified kosher U.S. media outlets.

This is not to say that any other major power is any better.  The Soviet Union made the U.S. look like angels back in the cold war days, and it's probably one of the main reasons we won the cold war.  Also, we probably were slightly better back in those days than we are now.  Not a lot however.

As an American it really is unfortunate to have to say this stuff, but I'm not going to close my eyes to the reality of the situation.  The U.S. foreign policy does seem to me to be about as close to pure evil as one can get.  Even in Vietnam where we sent psychos over to rape and murder, we also sent decent people who tried to limit the damage.  The My Lai massacre was a good case-in-point.  Now we just flood an area with pure psychos like ISIS.  Thanks Obama (Nobel peace prize winner) and Hillary Clinton.