Why the current crypto currency market is worse than the Rothschild central bank

[dimitriaustralia]

Why the need for bitcoin black?
The founding members of bitcoin own 95%+ of the entire crypto sphere! Founding members are disguised as Satoshi.
The new money system is doomed! The main need in the crypto space is a fair distibution with education to truly empower users, not to continue on the old path of money centralisation painted in a different picture based on tech.

From the start they owned the majority of  bitcoins and manipulated the price to accumulate more of a share in each project.
From this point any other project accepted bitcoin in ICO's and as accumulation through manipulation accumulated their holdings they invested a stake in the other altcoins.
Founding members get involved in a large stage and over time through manipulation accumulate more and more of a market share of the major projects.
Still at a small total market cap 400 Billion the manipulation continues with one goal to own more of a share of each crypto.
December 2017 masses were lured into crypto for the first time strategist to make them lose faith in the space and lose money. Many other rounds of luring will take place and accumulation of a greater % stake will take place into new upcoming projects.

It is the transitioning of the old money to the new money, owning more of a share in the new money than before. Making it seem fair, accidental and a betterment to humanity. When in fact its more slavery and concentration of wealth to the elite.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3124440.new#new

[1715498199]

1715498199

[1715498199]

1715498199

[1715498199]

1715498199

[KingScorpio]

Why the need for bitcoin black?
The founding members of bitcoin own 95%+ of the entire crypto sphere! Founding members are disguised as Satoshi.
The new money system is doomed! The main need in the crypto space is a fair distibution with education to truly empower users, not to continue on the old path of money centralisation painted in a different picture based on tech.

From the start they owned the majority of  bitcoins and manipulated the price to accumulate more of a share in each project.
From this point any other project accepted bitcoin in ICO's and as accumulation through manipulation accumulated their holdings they invested a stake in the other altcoins.
Founding members get involved in a large stage and over time through manipulation accumulate more and more of a market share of the major projects.
Still at a small total market cap 400 Billion the manipulation continues with one goal to own more of a share of each crypto.
December 2017 masses were lured into crypto for the first time strategist to make them lose faith in the space and lose money. Many other rounds of luring will take place and accumulation of a greater % stake will take place into new upcoming projects.

It is the transitioning of the old money to the new money, owning more of a share in the new money than before. Making it seem fair, accidental and a betterment to humanity. When in fact its more slavery and concentration of wealth to the elite.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3124440.new#new

well thats right, but the cryptocurrencies solve issues related to poverty and lobbyism of the established system elites,

after the cryptoeconomics scene is established there will be a new central bank and people can chose the cryptocurrencies they work for

regards

[Xester]

The reason why there are scamming and worst cryptocurrency is because there are no regulations or entity to filter out legit cryptocurrency from shitty and useless coins and tokens. Those usells coins are those coins made by developers to extract money from the public or those coins who have a very low chance of success. This may sound cruel but if you became a victim of those shitty and useless ICO's then you can say that the cryptocurrency world is worst than Rothschild banking system.

[dE_logics]

Why the need for bitcoin black?
The founding members of bitcoin own 95%+ of the entire crypto sphere! Founding members are disguised as Satoshi.
The new money system is doomed! The main need in the crypto space is a fair distibution with education to truly empower users, not to continue on the old path of money centralisation painted in a different picture based on tech.

From the start they owned the majority of  bitcoins and manipulated the price to accumulate more of a share in each project.
From this point any other project accepted bitcoin in ICO's and as accumulation through manipulation accumulated their holdings they invested a stake in the other altcoins.
Founding members get involved in a large stage and over time through manipulation accumulate more and more of a market share of the major projects.
Still at a small total market cap 400 Billion the manipulation continues with one goal to own more of a share of each crypto.
December 2017 masses were lured into crypto for the first time strategist to make them lose faith in the space and lose money. Many other rounds of luring will take place and accumulation of a greater % stake will take place into new upcoming projects.

It is the transitioning of the old money to the new money, owning more of a share in the new money than before. Making it seem fair, accidental and a betterment to humanity. When in fact its more slavery and concentration of wealth to the elite.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3124440.new#new

well thats right, but the cryptocurrencies solve issues related to poverty and lobbyism of the established system elites,

after the cryptoeconomics scene is established there will be a new central bank and people can chose the cryptocurrencies they work for

regards

If we are just replacing one central bank with another, what is the freedom in that? The same abuses will be carried out with crypto rather than fiat.

[Mpamaegbu]

The founding members of bitcoin own 95%+ of the entire crypto sphere! Founding members are disguised as Satoshi.
The new money system is doomed! The main need in the crypto space is a fair distibution with education to truly empower users, not to continue on the old path of money centralisation painted in a different picture based on tech.

This dominance is going go be on so long as there are forks still coming up. I am one against these forks for they place too much financial powers in the hands of early adopters. How do you explain waking up and discovering you have an equivalent of another coin in bitcoin nomenclature you didn't pay for. Sometimes these coins are even pricy. I mean that's crazy. Before we begin to blame the corruption in the fiat industry and the central banks, we need to first look inwards to tackling the issues within - especially the needless forks.

[ecnalubma]

Why the need for bitcoin black?
The founding members of bitcoin own 95%+ of the entire crypto sphere! Founding members are disguised as Satoshi.
The new money system is doomed! The main need in the crypto space is a fair distibution with education to truly empower users, not to continue on the old path of money centralisation painted in a different picture based on tech.

From the start they owned the majority of  bitcoins and manipulated the price to accumulate more of a share in each project.
From this point any other project accepted bitcoin in ICO's and as accumulation through manipulation accumulated their holdings they invested a stake in the other altcoins.
Founding members get involved in a large stage and over time through manipulation accumulate more and more of a market share of the major projects.
Still at a small total market cap 400 Billion the manipulation continues with one goal to own more of a share of each crypto.
December 2017 masses were lured into crypto for the first time strategist to make them lose faith in the space and lose money. Many other rounds of luring will take place and accumulation of a greater % stake will take place into new upcoming projects.

It is the transitioning of the old money to the new money, owning more of a share in the new money than before. Making it seem fair, accidental and a betterment to humanity. When in fact its more slavery and concentration of wealth to the elite.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3124440.new#new

Bitcoin and crypto will become the new standard of wealth and power, the scheme is same as the traditional and still the few controls the new ecosystem. In my opinion when all fiats are dissolved or devalued nothing will be change but only transparent wealth and the hype will be over.

[KingScorpio]

Why the need for bitcoin black?
The founding members of bitcoin own 95%+ of the entire crypto sphere! Founding members are disguised as Satoshi.
The new money system is doomed! The main need in the crypto space is a fair distibution with education to truly empower users, not to continue on the old path of money centralisation painted in a different picture based on tech.

From the start they owned the majority of  bitcoins and manipulated the price to accumulate more of a share in each project.
From this point any other project accepted bitcoin in ICO's and as accumulation through manipulation accumulated their holdings they invested a stake in the other altcoins.
Founding members get involved in a large stage and over time through manipulation accumulate more and more of a market share of the major projects.
Still at a small total market cap 400 Billion the manipulation continues with one goal to own more of a share of each crypto.
December 2017 masses were lured into crypto for the first time strategist to make them lose faith in the space and lose money. Many other rounds of luring will take place and accumulation of a greater % stake will take place into new upcoming projects.

It is the transitioning of the old money to the new money, owning more of a share in the new money than before. Making it seem fair, accidental and a betterment to humanity. When in fact its more slavery and concentration of wealth to the elite.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3124440.new#new

well thats right, but the cryptocurrencies solve issues related to poverty and lobbyism of the established system elites,

after the cryptoeconomics scene is established there will be a new central bank and people can chose the cryptocurrencies they work for

regards

If we are just replacing one central bank with another, what is the freedom in that? The same abuses will be carried out with crypto rather than fiat.

we decentralise and open an overregulated financial system, that serves never ending neofeudalist greed of established billionaires, countless family businesses live in constant risk to be able to pay their employees and other contracts. i can see that first hand were i live.

its right what we do dont worry, the people will still decide that evildoers will be somehow indicated i wrote an issue article about that:

evildoers are part of the world they also serve some purposes.

https://www.cryptoproductivity.com/single-post/2018/04/21/Coins-that-do-Nothing-stand-for-Nothing-and-protect-Nothing-arent-just-low-Quality-Coins-they-pose-the-risk-of-being-just-a-form-of-Parasitism

[dimitriaustralia]

Why the need for bitcoin black?
The founding members of bitcoin own 95%+ of the entire crypto sphere! Founding members are disguised as Satoshi.
The new money system is doomed! The main need in the crypto space is a fair distibution with education to truly empower users, not to continue on the old path of money centralisation painted in a different picture based on tech.

From the start they owned the majority of  bitcoins and manipulated the price to accumulate more of a share in each project.
From this point any other project accepted bitcoin in ICO's and as accumulation through manipulation accumulated their holdings they invested a stake in the other altcoins.
Founding members get involved in a large stage and over time through manipulation accumulate more and more of a market share of the major projects.
Still at a small total market cap 400 Billion the manipulation continues with one goal to own more of a share of each crypto.
December 2017 masses were lured into crypto for the first time strategist to make them lose faith in the space and lose money. Many other rounds of luring will take place and accumulation of a greater % stake will take place into new upcoming projects.

It is the transitioning of the old money to the new money, owning more of a share in the new money than before. Making it seem fair, accidental and a betterment to humanity. When in fact its more slavery and concentration of wealth to the elite.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3124440.new#new

well thats right, but the cryptocurrencies solve issues related to poverty and lobbyism of the established system elites,

after the cryptoeconomics scene is established there will be a new central bank and people can chose the cryptocurrencies they work for

regards

If we are just replacing one central bank with another, what is the freedom in that? The same abuses will be carried out with crypto rather than fiat.

we decentralise and open an overregulated financial system, that serves never ending neofeudalist greed of established billionaires, countless family businesses live in constant risk to be able to pay their employees and other contracts. i can see that first hand were i live.

its right what we do dont worry, the people will still decide that evildoers will be somehow indicated i wrote an issue article about that:

evildoers are part of the world they also serve some purposes.

https://www.cryptoproductivity.com/single-post/2018/04/21/Coins-that-do-Nothing-stand-for-Nothing-and-protect-Nothing-arent-just-low-Quality-Coins-they-pose-the-risk-of-being-just-a-form-of-Parasitism

It's the same central bank, only an illusion of being able to chose which one as all are already and will become more infiltrated.

[dimitriaustralia]

Why the need for bitcoin black?
The founding members of bitcoin own 95%+ of the entire crypto sphere! Founding members are disguised as Satoshi.
The new money system is doomed! The main need in the crypto space is a fair distibution with education to truly empower users, not to continue on the old path of money centralisation painted in a different picture based on tech.

From the start they owned the majority of  bitcoins and manipulated the price to accumulate more of a share in each project.
From this point any other project accepted bitcoin in ICO's and as accumulation through manipulation accumulated their holdings they invested a stake in the other altcoins.
Founding members get involved in a large stage and over time through manipulation accumulate more and more of a market share of the major projects.
Still at a small total market cap 400 Billion the manipulation continues with one goal to own more of a share of each crypto.
December 2017 masses were lured into crypto for the first time strategist to make them lose faith in the space and lose money. Many other rounds of luring will take place and accumulation of a greater % stake will take place into new upcoming projects.

It is the transitioning of the old money to the new money, owning more of a share in the new money than before. Making it seem fair, accidental and a betterment to humanity. When in fact its more slavery and concentration of wealth to the elite.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3124440.new#new

Bitcoin and crypto will become the new standard of wealth and power, the scheme is same as the traditional and still the few controls the new ecosystem. In my opinion when all fiats are dissolved or devalued nothing will be change but only transparent wealth and the hype will be over.

It is true! however distribution needs to be fairer. The previous elite hold the majority of all coins. Bitcoin has a dark history. eg. Many coins missing/ stolen / hacked. small group of founders. Occasional huge  strategic dumps. Price manipulation

[weeklyeth]

Crypto is a decentralized network with no involvement of central banks family owned business and governments so we cant relay on any speculative news

[Talat10gu]

BC is a new system which  is could be depended on all our future. Of course, it has special features, but we should accept it totally.

[kritiana008]

They are too different to compare them. Cryptocurrencies have their own advantages and central bank has its own. I don’t see any similarities.

[Tipstar]

Your accusation are hypothetical. Similarly, there are many shady things about the coin you are advertising.
There are already a number of transparently issued coins and tokens. Why one more?
Accusing another coin won't make your coin a success. A negative way of advertising while you are stealing the name of bitcoin for attention.

[Philip Ruby]

At least in the crypto world, we still have a possibility to make things transparent and to serve the consumer. Crypto world is more driven by the community and the community's belief in it. When things start to resemble the old status quo, there is instantly a market space for a new, more transparent, more honest, stable and innovative project, which will answer the key issues of the time. For me, this is still more driven by the grass root level than the high-level decision makers. It is not perfect, there are many issues related to possible scams etc, but this is the possibility for mankind to break free from old corporate status quo and make the commercial world more consumer friendly.

[bigcash2011]

What would you say about the fact that btc grew from around $1000 mark to around $20000 in 2017, this is unthinkable growth, no other sector can perform like this, yes there will be corrections on the way up and i think good correction was due after such a blast, its good for the market soon we will see new uptrend so do not panic market will be back soon.

[[ProTrader]]

Your claims have no evidence to prove your aligation. Bitcoin supply is scattered in many account holders and continues to multiply the numbers who holds it. You can check it in the Blockchain because it is public and do your own research before you invest mock here.

[mrhood]

As for me, crypto has more pluses than each bank all over the world. What is more, it is our future, I don't want to believe that real banks think that they have any chances against the crypto.

[icalical]

Why the need for bitcoin black?
The founding members of bitcoin own 95%+ of the entire crypto sphere! Founding members are disguised as Satoshi.
The new money system is doomed! The main need in the crypto space is a fair distibution with education to truly empower users, not to continue on the old path of money centralisation painted in a different picture based on tech.

From the start they owned the majority of  bitcoins and manipulated the price to accumulate more of a share in each project.
From this point any other project accepted bitcoin in ICO's and as accumulation through manipulation accumulated their holdings they invested a stake in the other altcoins.
Founding members get involved in a large stage and over time through manipulation accumulate more and more of a market share of the major projects.
Still at a small total market cap 400 Billion the manipulation continues with one goal to own more of a share of each crypto.
December 2017 masses were lured into crypto for the first time strategist to make them lose faith in the space and lose money. Many other rounds of luring will take place and accumulation of a greater % stake will take place into new upcoming projects.

It is the transitioning of the old money to the new money, owning more of a share in the new money than before. Making it seem fair, accidental and a betterment to humanity. When in fact its more slavery and concentration of wealth to the elite.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3124440.new#new

first of all you need to prove that 95% f the entire crypto is own by Satoshi. There is no such thing, maybe most of crypto were owned by some group of people, (the antminer producer) but it is not 95%, your statement is hillarious. Crypto is needed by society, bitcoin and other altcoins is revolutionary projects in the world economic system. You were spreading FUD about bitcoin in the bitcoin forum, thats the worst idea ever.