Bitcoin Forum
November 24, 2017, 10:56:05 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: GPUs for mining?  (Read 3627 times)
theGECK
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 413



View Profile
February 11, 2011, 11:29:59 PM
 #1

Hello everybody!

Does anybody have thoughts about a GPU that gives great bang for your buck with Bitcoin mining? Assume any budget. I'm currently happy with my rate, I'm just wondering what other's thoughts are.

Use my referral codes for Bitcoin faucets and I'll send you 25% of my referral bonus - Win/Win! PM for details on all sites available or use one of the links here.

FreeBitco.in | FreeDoge.co.in
Join ICO Now A blockchain platform for effective freelancing
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1511564165
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1511564165

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1511564165
Reply with quote  #2

1511564165
Report to moderator
1511564165
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1511564165

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1511564165
Reply with quote  #2

1511564165
Report to moderator
MrMagic
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 34


View Profile
February 11, 2011, 11:41:46 PM
 #2

http://pastebin.com/AvymGnMJ is a link to list of GPUs and their MHashs/sec MHash/watt compiled by someone else. Someone posted it in another thread and I found it useful. I look at http://www.newegg.com for good prices.


BTC: 1FDqBwA2YEinCrzhhZ6AqCM8PMJQiNGqTr
LTC: LMKwqdHaYwuYgQaTyLEvaXB7itTzb2PTxv
DTC: DNn21GEpQX82z5BNeFPttTCU4PDL8CahH2
dust
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 840



View Profile WWW
February 12, 2011, 01:04:15 AM
 #3

Radeon 5970's are the the best cards for mining if you can get them at their "normal" price of ~$500usd.  Now, it looks like they stopped making them and most new ones are on sale for $600-700, or out of stock.  Radeon 5870s are currently a good choice (especially if you have cheap or free electricity) as they are available for around ~$200 and have a bit more than half the hash/s of a 5970 at stock clocks.  The disadvantages of 5870's are that you can fit less hash/s on a single motherboard and that they are less energy efficient compared to the 5970s.

Cryptocoin Mining Info | OTC | PGP | Twitter | freenode: dust-otc | BTC: 1F6fV4U2xnpAuKtmQD6BWpK3EuRosKzF8U
Transisto
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1731



View Profile WWW
February 14, 2011, 11:28:39 PM
 #4

What about 6950 @ 250$ , it has 500M more transistor and twice the ram.

2154M vs  2640M
xenon481
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406



View Profile
February 14, 2011, 11:36:10 PM
 #5

What about 6950 @ 250$ , it has 500M more transistor and twice the ram.

2154M vs  2640M

Notice from the chart that the 6850 only runs a little over 2/3rds as fast as a 5850 and is less efficient from a MHash/Watt perspective. It is not transistor count nor RAM that matters, but integer performance. And more importantly, integer performance with regards to wattage because the card cost is singular and up front, while the electricity cost is on going. The difference in MHash/Watt can eventually erode any initial up front savings.

Tips Appreciated: 171TQ2wJg7bxj2q68VNibU75YZB22b7ZDr
marcus_of_augustus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2436



View Profile
February 15, 2011, 01:18:01 AM
 #6

Here's a 52 gpu cluster of HD5970's hacked together for GSM phone hacking http://blog.zorinaq.com/?e=45 ... seems like the 5970 is far superior to anything on the open market for integer performance.

I wonder why that is since it is ostensibly sold in graphics cards? Maybe the NSA had some input with AMD on that one ...

[Tycho]
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742



View Profile WWW
February 15, 2011, 08:17:44 AM
 #7

The disadvantages of 5870's are that you can fit less hash/s on a single motherboard and that they are less energy efficient compared to the 5970s.
I doubt about energy efficiency, it's only few percent of difference because in Windows at stock frequency 5970 has only 1.5-1.7 times more hashing power than 5870 and consumes 1.5 times more watts. When you overclock and overvolt 5970 it will take considerably more watts than it's specified <300 W.

5870's default frequency is 850 Mhz and it usually runs fine at 950 without any modifications or special cooling.
5970 is clocked at 725 Mhz and usually needs voltage rising to run faster than 800 Mhz. You'll also need serious PSU and cooling.

Welcome to my bitcoin mining pool: https://deepbit.net - Both payment schemes (including PPS), instant payout, no invalid blocks !
ICBIT Trading platform : USD/BTC futures trading, Bitcoin difficulty futures (NEW!). Third year in bitcoin business.
os2sam
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2282


Think for yourself


View Profile
October 29, 2017, 02:50:28 AM
 #8

Well mining by gpu is not as such profitable.  But one cab begin with it. When mining at 1 GH/s in a pool you earn somewhere between 0.00001-0.00005 Bitcoin per day, worth approximately 1 cent. The cost of electricity far exceeds 1 cent per day when mining Bitcoin with a GPU.So it’s simply not worthwhile to mine Bitcoin with a CPU or GPU. Currently the only way to profitably mine Bitcoin is to use an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC), so why to do when you don't get much profit..  I prefer  ASIC over GPU.

This thread you resurrected is almost 7 years old.  It has no bearing on mining today.

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!