sp_
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 06, 2018, 11:24:50 PM |
|
You didn't answer my question.
You claim to have the fastest open source and fastest closed source x16r miners, without any proof whatsoever... at least you're consistent
Here is a snapshot of the sp-mod private. each kernel in the x16r is run once. (x16s permutation). The enemy miner should include a command line option that can force a given sequence. Then we can do a direct comparison. Only 2 of the 16 kernels are included in the spmod-git opensource. (the hamsi80 and the luffa final) gpu settings 100% tdp and +100 on the coreclock. (-i 24.4 in the batfile) The bigfarm sp-mod x16r private binary also include a fast x17 kernel, and the x17 is more profitable right now on the 1080ti ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fimage.ibb.co%2FkByrR7%2Fsp_mod_private.png&t=665&c=XjVsgSuISCQXkQ)
|
|
|
|
JackIT (OP)
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 99
Merit: 8
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 06, 2018, 11:40:00 PM |
|
You didn't answer my question.
You claim to have the fastest open source and fastest closed source x16r miners, without any proof whatsoever... at least you're consistent
Here is a snapshot of the sp-mod private. each kernel in the x16r is run once. (x16s permutation). The enemy miner should include a command line option that can force a given sequence. Then we can do a direct comparison. Only 2 of the 16 kernels are included in the spmod-git opensource. (the hamsi80 and the luffa final) gpu settings 100% tdp and +100 on the coreclock. (-i 24.4 in the batfile) The bigfarm sp-mod x16r private binary also include a fast x17 kernel, and the x17 is more profitable right now on the 1080ti ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fimage.ibb.co%2FkByrR7%2Fsp_mod_private.png&t=665&c=XjVsgSuISCQXkQ) means very little. I've hit 28.x MH/s on Enemy 1.08, just depends on the algos in the blocks
|
X16R - RVN - Miner head to head test log (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3385643)
|
|
|
sp_
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 06, 2018, 11:42:50 PM |
|
I've hit 28.x MH/s on Enemy 1.08, just depends on the algos in the blocks
I've hit 100MHASH with the sp-mod private x16r, but the sequence in the picture is a x16s sequence. every hashing algo is executed once(permuted order, and not a random order): Sequence number B0126C3E789AF4D5
|
|
|
|
JackIT (OP)
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 99
Merit: 8
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 07, 2018, 12:24:55 AM |
|
I've hit 28.x MH/s on Enemy 1.08, just depends on the algos in the blocks
I've hit 100MHASH with the sp-mod private x16r, but the sequence in the picture is a x16s sequence. every hashing algo is executed once(permuted order, and not a random order): Sequence number B0126C3E789AF4D5 You still haven't answered why you'd release an open source miner?
|
X16R - RVN - Miner head to head test log (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3385643)
|
|
|
sp_
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 07, 2018, 12:32:35 AM Last edit: May 07, 2018, 01:14:30 AM by sp_ |
|
You still haven't answered why you'd release an open source miner?
I disassembled his code and found some optimalizations. Now the enemy can copy paste my code and gain a few percent. my school is old school http://www.pouet.net
|
|
|
|
sp_
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 07, 2018, 12:59:59 AM |
|
which one? sp mod 2? like btx?
The sp-mod #2 have a buffer overflow exploit. Some gpl shitcode from the klaus_t and the french swiss dude.. Disable the ccminer API... SIA-coin backdoor...
|
|
|
|
JackIT (OP)
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 99
Merit: 8
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 07, 2018, 01:05:45 AM |
|
the french swiss dude..
Tanguy aka TPruvot
|
X16R - RVN - Miner head to head test log (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3385643)
|
|
|
JackIT (OP)
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 99
Merit: 8
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 07, 2018, 01:08:34 AM |
|
I've hit 28.x MH/s on Enemy 1.08, just depends on the algos in the blocks
I've hit 100MHASH with the sp-mod private x16r, but the sequence in the picture is a x16s sequence. every hashing algo is executed once(permuted order, and not a random order): Sequence number B0126C3E789AF4D5 Well, I'd be happy to test the sp-mod private version.. I promise I'll return it when done ![Lips sealed](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/lipsrsealed.gif)
|
X16R - RVN - Miner head to head test log (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3385643)
|
|
|
sp_
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 07, 2018, 01:13:36 AM Last edit: May 07, 2018, 01:26:09 AM by sp_ |
|
Well, I'd be happy to test the sp-mod private version.. I promise I'll return it when done ![Lips sealed](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/lipsrsealed.gif) The sp-mod harvester has been mining for months. More than 1000++ 1080ti rigs. Million dollar profit.
|
|
|
|
Bimmber
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 210
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 07, 2018, 04:31:49 AM |
|
SP,
Why don`t you add dev fee and release your top performing miner? You can then make 0.05 btc every few days. You could avoid all this drama...
|
|
|
|
latinpmeow
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 07, 2018, 05:25:16 AM |
|
thanks for sharing this amazing content !
|
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 07, 2018, 07:46:58 AM |
|
SP,
Why don`t you add dev fee and release your top performing miner? You can then make 0.05 btc every few days. You could avoid all this drama...
he's waiting for someone to make dev fee code public... and make it 5% faster ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) yeah, I am not sure if he ever wrote any piece of code himself... ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
MrsDelish
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 07, 2018, 11:04:45 AM |
|
SP,
Why don`t you add dev fee and release your top performing miner? You can then make 0.05 btc every few days. You could avoid all this drama...
he's waiting for someone to make dev fee code public... and make it 5% faster ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) yeah, I am not sure if he ever wrote any piece of code himself... ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) The dev fee code should already be there since it is a fork of Nevermore. (ccminer 2.2.5-rvn -> Nevermore -> Suprminer -> Sp-mod-git)
|
|
|
|
antonio8
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 07, 2018, 11:07:44 AM |
|
SP,
Why don`t you add dev fee and release your top performing miner? You can then make 0.05 btc every few days. You could avoid all this drama...
he's waiting for someone to make dev fee code public... and make it 5% faster ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) yeah, I am not sure if he ever wrote any piece of code himself... ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) He hasn't.
|
If you are going to leave your BTC on an exchange please send it to this address instead 1GH3ub3UUHbU5qDJW5u3E9jZ96ZEmzaXtG, I will at least use the money better than someone who steals it from the exchange. Thanks ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 07, 2018, 12:15:29 PM |
|
SP,
Why don`t you add dev fee and release your top performing miner? You can then make 0.05 btc every few days. You could avoid all this drama...
he's waiting for someone to make dev fee code public... and make it 5% faster ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) yeah, I am not sure if he ever wrote any piece of code himself... ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) The dev fee code should already be there since it is a fork of Nevermore. (ccminer 2.2.5-rvn -> Nevermore -> Suprminer -> Sp-mod-git) thanks for pointing it to him ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) now, he will have a dev fee created by sp himself... love his linkedin page btw, where he says he created ccminer ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
Bimmber
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 210
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 07, 2018, 12:23:17 PM |
|
Can I have a link to his LI ? ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif)
|
|
|
|
dewdeded
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1011
Monero Evangelist
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 07, 2018, 01:48:41 PM |
|
Subbed.
|
|
|
|
Quake4
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 825
Merit: 18
MindMiner developer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 07, 2018, 10:01:52 PM |
|
JackIT
Please run test 1.09test5 vs sp3 vs 1.08.
|
MindMiner - miner manager programm with autoswitch between Algos&Pools. This isnt a fork based on MultiPoolMiner (Nemos, SniffDog, Mega, NPlus & etc)
|
|
|
ruplikminer
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 504
Merit: 3
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 07, 2018, 10:31:57 PM |
|
JackIT
Please run test 1.09test5 vs sp3 vs 1.08.
+2
|
|
|
|
JackIT (OP)
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 99
Merit: 8
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 07, 2018, 11:29:10 PM Last edit: May 09, 2018, 11:18:41 AM by JackIT |
|
Enemy 1.09 BETA 5 Vs. Enemy 1.08 Vs. sp-mod git3For this test I used a single 12 GPU 1080Ti rig on Windows 10, split into three mining instances. All three mining instances were balanced to get as close to the same hash rate as possible. Each mining instance is running at the same time on the same machine mining on the same pool. All three instances have intensity set to 21, GPU target power set to 100%, no overclocking. Static stratum diff set to 40 for Round 1 v1.0, 70 for Round 1 v2.0 and onward, reason: previous test showed pool diff settings impacting results and making them non linear. The instances/rig are managed by Awesome Miner, which restarts the miners for various reasons, based on rules I set. The plan is to do three rounds of testing, each round lasting approximately 8-12hrs, at the conclusion of each round I'll rotate the miner to a new instance, until each miner has had a chance to run on each instance. I'll then normalize the results to averaged blocks found per round, so that each instance/round is represented equally. Miners tested:Enemy 1.09 BETA 5 - 1% dev fee Enemy 1.08 - 1% dev fee sp-mod git3 - no dev fee Results:Round 1 v1.0 - Stopped after 110 minutes, with 30 blocks found. sp-mod was steadily 20-30% behind. I decided to re-run round 1 with SP-mod and 1.09 swapping instances, as well as increasing the stratum diff from 40 to 70. Link to graph of results: https://imgur.com/a/IPPkRYf- [Instance 1] 26.33 RVN - Enemy 1.09 - Pool Link
- [Instance 2] 24.19 RVN - Enemy 1.08 - Pool Link
- [Instance 3] 19.36 RVN - sp-mod - Pool Link
Round 1 v2.0 - Duration: 540 Minutes - 120 blocks found - No restarts - [Instance 1] Normalized: 94.31 RVN | Raw: 92.01 RVN - sp-mod - Pool Link
- [Instance 2] Normalized: 95.66 RVN | Raw: 93.33 RVN - Enemy 1.08 - Pool Link
- [Instance 3] Normalized: 102.39 RVN | Raw: 99.89 RVN - Enemy 1.09 - Pool Link
Round 2 - Duration: 524 Minutes - 124 blocks found - No restarts - [Instance 1] Normalized: 105.98 RVN | Raw: 106.84 RVN - Enemy 1.09 - Pool Link
- [Instance 2] Normalized: 91.19 RVN | Raw: 91.93 RVN - sp-mod - Pool Link
- [Instance 3] Normalized: 101.07 RVN | Raw: 101.89 RVN - Enemy 1.08 - Pool Link
Round 3 - Duration: around 9hrs. 125 blocks found - near the start of the test ravenminer.com was being DDOS'd so I had to pause the test for a few hours. - [Instance 1] Normalized: 99.51 RVN | Raw: 101.13 RVN - Enemy 1.08 - Pool Link
- [Instance 2] Normalized: 110.45 RVN | Raw: 112.24 RVN - Enemy 1.09 - Pool Link
- [Instance 3] Normalized: 105.89 RVN | Raw: 107.61 RVN - sp-mod - Pool Link
FINAL Normalized Average Results #1 | * | | Enemy 1.09 Beta5 | | 106.27 RVN | #2 | -7.62% | | Enemy 1.08 | | 98.75 RVN | #3 | -9.41% | | sp-mod git3 | | 97.13 RVN |
Round 1 v2.0 Graph Round 2 Graph Round 3 Graph![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FljUvWLs.png&t=665&c=CeUW_wxGC_vZMg)
|
X16R - RVN - Miner head to head test log (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3385643)
|
|
|
|