X16R - RVN - Miner head to head test log

[sp_]

You didn't answer my question.

 You claim to have the fastest open source and fastest closed source x16r miners, without any proof whatsoever... at least you're consistent

Here is a snapshot of the sp-mod private. each kernel in the x16r is run once. (x16s permutation). The enemy miner should include a command line option that can force a given sequence. Then we can do a direct comparison. Only 2 of the 16 kernels are included in the spmod-git opensource. (the hamsi80 and the luffa final)

gpu settings

100% tdp and +100 on the coreclock. (-i 24.4 in the batfile)

The bigfarm sp-mod x16r private binary also include a fast x17 kernel, and the x17 is more profitable right now on the 1080ti

[JackIT]

You didn't answer my question.

 You claim to have the fastest open source and fastest closed source x16r miners, without any proof whatsoever... at least you're consistent

Here is a snapshot of the sp-mod private. each kernel in the x16r is run once. (x16s permutation). The enemy miner should include a command line option that can force a given sequence. Then we can do a direct comparison. Only 2 of the 16 kernels are included in the spmod-git opensource. (the hamsi80 and the luffa final)

gpu settings

100% tdp and +100 on the coreclock. (-i 24.4 in the batfile)

The bigfarm sp-mod x16r private binary also include a fast x17 kernel, and the x17 is more profitable right now on the 1080ti

means very little.

I've hit 28.x MH/s on Enemy 1.08, just depends on the algos in the blocks

[sp_]

I've hit 28.x MH/s on Enemy 1.08, just depends on the algos in the blocks

I've hit 100MHASH with the sp-mod private x16r, but the sequence in the picture is a x16s sequence. every hashing algo is executed once(permuted order, and not a random order): Sequence number B0126C3E789AF4D5

[JackIT]

I've hit 28.x MH/s on Enemy 1.08, just depends on the algos in the blocks

I've hit 100MHASH with the sp-mod private x16r, but the sequence in the picture is a x16s sequence. every hashing algo is executed once(permuted order, and not a random order): Sequence number B0126C3E789AF4D5

You still haven't answered why you'd release an open source miner?

[sp_]

You still haven't answered why you'd release an open source miner?

I disassembled his code and found some optimalizations. Now the enemy can copy paste my code and gain a few percent.

my school is old school

http://www.pouet.net

[sp_]

which one? sp mod 2? like btx?

The sp-mod #2 have a buffer overflow exploit. Some gpl  shitcode from the klaus_t and the french swiss dude.. Disable the ccminer API... SIA-coin backdoor...

[JackIT]

 the french swiss dude..

Tanguy aka TPruvot

[JackIT]

I've hit 28.x MH/s on Enemy 1.08, just depends on the algos in the blocks

I've hit 100MHASH with the sp-mod private x16r, but the sequence in the picture is a x16s sequence. every hashing algo is executed once(permuted order, and not a random order): Sequence number B0126C3E789AF4D5

Well, I'd be happy to test the sp-mod private version.. I promise I'll return it when done 

[sp_]

Well, I'd be happy to test the sp-mod private version.. I promise I'll return it when done  

The sp-mod harvester has been mining for months. More than 1000++ 1080ti rigs. Million dollar profit.

[Bimmber]

SP,

Why don`t you add dev fee and release your top performing miner? You can then make 0.05 btc every few days. You could avoid all this drama...

[latinpmeow]

thanks for sharing this amazing content !

[djm34]

SP,

Why don`t you add dev fee and release your top performing miner? You can then make 0.05 btc every few days. You could avoid all this drama...

he's waiting for someone to make dev fee code public... and make it 5% faster
yeah, I am not sure if he ever wrote any piece of code himself...

[MrsDelish]

SP,

Why don`t you add dev fee and release your top performing miner? You can then make 0.05 btc every few days. You could avoid all this drama...

he's waiting for someone to make dev fee code public... and make it 5% faster
yeah, I am not sure if he ever wrote any piece of code himself...

The dev fee code should already be there since it is a fork of Nevermore.
(ccminer 2.2.5-rvn -> Nevermore -> Suprminer -> Sp-mod-git)

[antonio8]

SP,

Why don`t you add dev fee and release your top performing miner? You can then make 0.05 btc every few days. You could avoid all this drama...

he's waiting for someone to make dev fee code public... and make it 5% faster
yeah, I am not sure if he ever wrote any piece of code himself...

He hasn't.

[djm34]

SP,

Why don`t you add dev fee and release your top performing miner? You can then make 0.05 btc every few days. You could avoid all this drama...

he's waiting for someone to make dev fee code public... and make it 5% faster
yeah, I am not sure if he ever wrote any piece of code himself...

The dev fee code should already be there since it is a fork of Nevermore.
(ccminer 2.2.5-rvn -> Nevermore -> Suprminer -> Sp-mod-git)

thanks for pointing it to him
now, he will have a dev fee created by sp himself...

love his linkedin page btw, where he says he created ccminer  

[Bimmber]

Can I have a link to his LI ?

[dewdeded]

Subbed.

[Quake4]

JackIT

Please run test 1.09test5 vs sp3 vs 1.08.

[ruplikminer]

JackIT

Please run test 1.09test5 vs sp3 vs 1.08.

+2

[JackIT]

Enemy 1.09 BETA 5 Vs. Enemy 1.08 Vs. sp-mod git3

For this test I used a single 12 GPU 1080Ti rig on Windows 10, split into three mining instances. All three mining instances were balanced to get as close to the same hash rate as possible.
Each mining instance is running at the same time on the same machine mining on the same pool.

All three instances have intensity set to 21, GPU target power set to 100%, no overclocking.

Static stratum diff set to 40 for Round 1 v1.0, 70 for Round 1 v2.0 and onward, reason: previous test showed pool diff settings impacting results and making them non linear.

The instances/rig are managed by Awesome Miner, which restarts the miners for various reasons, based on rules I set.

The plan is to do three rounds of testing, each round lasting approximately 8-12hrs, at the conclusion of each round I'll rotate the miner to a new instance, until each miner has had a chance to run on each instance.
I'll then normalize the results to averaged blocks found per round, so that each instance/round is represented equally.

Miners tested:
Enemy 1.09 BETA 5 - 1% dev fee
Enemy 1.08 - 1% dev fee
sp-mod git3 - no dev fee


Results:

Round 1 v1.0 - Stopped after 110 minutes, with 30 blocks found. sp-mod was steadily 20-30% behind. I decided to re-run round 1 with SP-mod and 1.09 swapping instances, as well as increasing the stratum diff from 40 to 70. Link to graph of results: https://imgur.com/a/IPPkRYf

• [Instance 1] 26.33 RVN - Enemy 1.09 - Pool Link
• [Instance 2] 24.19 RVN - Enemy 1.08 - Pool Link
• [Instance 3] 19.36 RVN - sp-mod - Pool Link

Round 1 v2.0 -  Duration: 540 Minutes - 120 blocks found - No restarts

• [Instance 1] Normalized:    94.31 RVN | Raw: 92.01 RVN - sp-mod - Pool Link
• [Instance 2] Normalized:    95.66 RVN | Raw: 93.33 RVN - Enemy 1.08 - Pool Link
• [Instance 3] Normalized:  102.39 RVN | Raw: 99.89 RVN - Enemy 1.09 - Pool Link

Round 2  - Duration: 524 Minutes - 124 blocks found - No restarts

• [Instance 1] Normalized: 105.98 RVN | Raw: 106.84 RVN - Enemy 1.09 - Pool Link
• [Instance 2] Normalized:   91.19 RVN | Raw: 91.93 RVN - sp-mod - Pool Link
• [Instance 3] Normalized: 101.07 RVN | Raw: 101.89 RVN - Enemy 1.08 - Pool Link

Round 3 - Duration: around 9hrs. 125 blocks found - near the start of the test ravenminer.com was being DDOS'd so I had to pause the test for a few hours.

• [Instance 1] Normalized:   99.51 RVN | Raw: 101.13 RVN - Enemy 1.08 - Pool Link
• [Instance 2] Normalized: 110.45 RVN | Raw: 112.24 RVN - Enemy 1.09 - Pool Link
• [Instance 3] Normalized: 105.89 RVN | Raw: 107.61 RVN - sp-mod - Pool Link

FINAL Normalized Average Results

#1	*	| Enemy 1.09 Beta5	| 106.27 RVN
#2	-7.62%	| Enemy 1.08	| 98.75 RVN
#3	-9.41%	| sp-mod git3	| 97.13 RVN

Round 1 v2.0 Graph



Round 2 Graph


Round 3 Graph