Bitcoin Forum
November 07, 2024, 03:43:58 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: Quark is up 100% on possible reform news? Give me feedback _ Poll
Cap Reward (after low Reward inflation)
Move blocks to 90 Seconds
Move Algo to MPoW
I like nothing , I hate life. and I hate Quark.
Move algo to better version of MPoW !
Keep Current Algo , but make the other general changes.

Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Quark Evolution and Reform news. updated _ Poll  (Read 838 times)
digitalindustry (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 1000


‘Try to be nice’


View Profile WWW
November 20, 2013, 04:24:57 PM
Last edit: November 22, 2013, 10:55:02 AM by digitalindustry
 #1

Ok how this poll works _

each voter gets 1 votes  potentially 1 each of the options -  ** edit poll did not function as supposedly meant to but this still works






-- Cap reward means Quark will not be inflationary it will be deflationary.

-- MPoW (Momentum Proof of Work) is the PTS algo known for being Memory hard and hard for GPU and ASICS.    < i'm with the community on this - i didn't respect the current algo as much as i should have .

-- 90 Second Blocks from the current 30 Seconds -  

- Twitter @Kolin_Quark
digitalindustry (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 1000


‘Try to be nice’


View Profile WWW
November 20, 2013, 04:43:32 PM
 #2

I proposed all this and Generally so far the Quark community has been warm to it ?

I also called the bottom at  32z7   0.00000032   <  i mean z7 ? come on ? for Quark ?

that was the bottom .



- Twitter @Kolin_Quark
digitalindustry (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 1000


‘Try to be nice’


View Profile WWW
November 21, 2013, 01:32:11 AM
 #3

Quark,  has a massive potential. 


- Twitter @Kolin_Quark
victzhang
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 193
Merit: 100


View Profile
November 21, 2013, 03:02:53 AM
 #4

I personally don't think changing POW is a good idea.
Quark has its own, unique POW and running without any problems. Why we want to change that?
FlipPro
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764
Merit: 1015


View Profile
November 21, 2013, 04:01:37 AM
 #5

I personally don't think changing POW is a good idea.
Quark has its own, unique POW and running without any problems. Why we want to change that?
What changes would you like to see?
digitalindustry (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 1000


‘Try to be nice’


View Profile WWW
November 21, 2013, 08:12:30 AM
 #6

Thanks  for the feedback guys .

- Twitter @Kolin_Quark
victzhang
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 193
Merit: 100


View Profile
November 21, 2013, 09:15:20 PM
 #7

I personally don't think changing POW is a good idea.
Quark has its own, unique POW and running without any problems. Why we want to change that?
What changes would you like to see?

Deflationary (to have block reward be MAX(1, TransactionFees), as Max proposed) might be a good idea.

I think the first priority is to promote this coin. Currently no gaming websites accept QRK. Only very few online stores support QRK. And very few people use it as a currency. The first thing to do is to attract more user to use it, rather than implement some technical refinements.
Red Kendra
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 59
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 21, 2013, 09:19:10 PM
 #8

I personally don't think changing POW is a good idea.
Quark has its own, unique POW and running without any problems. Why we want to change that?

That should be an option in the poll - "Keep current POW algo".
FlipPro
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764
Merit: 1015


View Profile
November 22, 2013, 08:38:15 AM
 #9

I personally don't think changing POW is a good idea.
Quark has its own, unique POW and running without any problems. Why we want to change that?

That should be an option in the poll - "Keep current POW algo".

Making it deflationary would not be a bad idea. Although how would you guarantee people will keep the network alive? Fees?

Seems like mining is one of the few things that keeps most of these alt's going on their bad days.
digitalindustry (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 1000


‘Try to be nice’


View Profile WWW
November 22, 2013, 09:19:36 AM
 #10

I personally don't think changing POW is a good idea.
Quark has its own, unique POW and running without any problems. Why we want to change that?

That should be an option in the poll - "Keep current POW algo".


Agreed friend and , adding ! i'm sold on the current Algorithm, i think it has potential  !


Flip i think bad days are over soon .

updated. Reset.

- Twitter @Kolin_Quark
digitalindustry (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 1000


‘Try to be nice’


View Profile WWW
November 22, 2013, 10:55:37 AM
 #11

thanks for the feedback . - on the update.

- Twitter @Kolin_Quark
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!