Bitcoin Forum
December 11, 2024, 07:53:11 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: is there an altcoin that addresses any of BTC's issues?  (Read 464 times)
opticalcarrier (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100



View Profile
November 20, 2013, 08:47:12 PM
 #1

Such as size of the ledger, risk of the 2/3 vs 1/3 mining ratio and hiding hashes, etc?  And/Or even more ideally, one that implements some kind of escrow.

There is a thread in the regular forums that Id like to participate in but Im a noob.
DannyHamilton
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3514
Merit: 4894



View Profile
November 20, 2013, 11:53:21 PM
 #2

Such as size of the ledger,

This is an issue?  The ledger is not even 20 GB in size?  It would fit on a single layer blu ray disk with room to spare for a few more years.  It doesn't even fill up 0.5% of a 4 TB hard drive.

risk of the 2/3 vs 1/3 mining ratio

The only way for an electronic currency to work is for there to be a consensus on which transactions have occurred and in which order.  If you don't want a centralized system where you have to trust a person or company to enforce this consensus, then you are left with a system where the nodes of the network must enforce the consensus on each other.  If you don't want a system where a minority of the power can over-rule the consensus, you are stuck with accepting the consensus from the majority.

and hiding hashes, etc?

Hiding hashes? Explain?

There is a thread in the regular forums that Id like to participate in but Im a noob.

That won't last long.  Have fun.
opticalcarrier (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100



View Profile
November 21, 2013, 12:14:44 AM
 #3

I think the ledger size will be an issue, eventually.  Consider if in a few years BTC does take off as the de facto standard digital currency (which at this point, looking like it will be the one, its just adoption time that is an issue) then what about when transaction rate REALLY starts to kick in.

the 1/3 and 2/3 thing wasnt stictly the de/centralized type of scenario issue as much as it was regarding a published vulnerability regarding possibility of a large mining pool running rogue code that would find a block buy not immediately publish the coins so as to get a jump on crunching on the next hash.  see http://www.scribd.com/doc/181412760/Bitcoin-Mining-Vulnerability-Paper  Although obviously this wouldnt be an issue (I dont believe) after all coins have been dispersed from the protocol.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!