Can a cryptocoin survive if a dev remains anonymous?

[Indrawan77]

It will be better if we knew the developers when we invested or using particular crypto, if we knew the developers it will be easier for us to give suggestions, but its not a must for us to know the developers, most of the people don't really care about the developers and the coin still success, if the coin already got a solid feature then the developers existence won't be too affected

[Kokondao]

It's better that we always think in a positive way, and I believe that it will always survive and develop well for the future.

[Batang Hambog]

Can a cryptocoin survive if a dev remains anonymous?
I do not think so. What's your opinion?

I guess it could survive because no one has interfered on the cryptocurrency system even the government system. They are just only giving some advises regarding on this kind of investment. As we all know that all of us here who had join in the forum are all anonymous and what have we observe in this forum? well we are still free and continue in doing business so meaning we still survive and we will because some of the members here are depending now on bitcoin as their ways of getting another source for income

[nazaididuan1]

Satoshi nakamoto is the chief designer of BTC and has not been seen in the world before!

I believe that the survival time of an encrypted currency is not related to the designer, but mainly depends on the application of the digital cryptographic currency.

[CuteBaby123]

Can a cryptocoin survive if a dev remains anonymous?
I do not think so. What's your opinion?

It will survive and survival depends on the demand and transaction of the coins and not on the popularity of the developer. Look at Bitcoin, the identity of Satoshi Nakamoto is still unknown until these days, but through the demand and high transactions of bitcoin, it is still surviving and the most famous coin,

[darkangel11]

Who wrote the Internet protocol? How can you use a protocol if you don't know the developer who wrote it? Easy, you are doing it right now.

We actually know who did it.

Department of Defense, ARPANET used packet switching to allow multiple computers to communicate on a single network. The technology continued to grow in the 1970s after scientists Robert Kahn and Vinton Cerf developed Transmission Control Protocol and Internet Protocol, or TCP/IP, a communications model that set standards for how data could be transmitted between multiple networks. ARPANET adopted TCP/IP on January 1, 1983, and from there researchers began to assemble the “network of networks” that became the modern Internet.

That said, you are right about the identity of the creator being irrelevant. Bitcoin proves that you don't need to have a known creator and be successful.

[cryptofeel]

Yes. And Bitcoin is a very true and appropriate example of how a coin may survive with anonymous dev. The reason is the value and benefit the coin and its system may bring to potential clients and the benefits that are there.

[gentlemand]

If it's a fully legit coin, ie not one with a ridiculous or secret premine and fully open source, then a real developer puts it together and sends it out into the world. Then it's the rest of the world's business to take it and run with it.

If you're talking ICOs, bank backing, private funding, back doors, then the coin is likely to be hammered by regulators at some point unless it complies from the beginning and someone anonymous trying to maintain a large amount of control over something that isn't in spirit supposed to be controlled will probably come unstuck.

[Doge dealer]

it definitely can because it has evolved to such a level where in it has moved passed the level where any one person can influence it , fact is we are using this technology and we see it definitely has a role to play so it will outlive whoever created it , the creator's identity is not necessary because at the end of the day bitcoins is self sustaining and dosent need anyone to "nurse" /nourish it anymore ....it has morphed into its own identity now and satoshi is really not needed anymore, kudos to satoshi though , obviously a genius among men.

[cryptoalfs76]

Can a cryptocoin survive if a dev remains anonymous?
I do not think so. What's your opinion?

Actually since from the start when satoshi nakamoto,created this crypto technology its still remains anonymous the personality of creator of this cryptocurrency system,even until now we dont know the true identity of this person,and  this bitcoin survive  now many centuries,so there's no reason that this cryptocoin could not survive with the development  remains anonymous,therefore this progressive happen now of digital currency is the living present,thats its still survive in terms of investment .

[ayesha201009]

Can a cryptocoin survive if a dev remains anonymous?
I do not think so. What's your opinion?

yes I think it's should remain anonymous, so why reveal the real identity?
there is no reason, even these are p2p project full decentralized open source!

[kalstarzz]

Can a cryptocoin survive if a dev remains anonymous?
I do not think so. What's your opinion?

the crypto-coin will survive as long as anyone develops it, even though dev is an anonymous even though dev blurry crypto coin will keep it running while still there developing it. that's the thing I've met.