Bitcoin.com mobile wallet is a fraud and everyone must report it.

[chek2fire]

Bitcoin.com has completely transform to e fraud wallet and imo everyone must report it. New users lost their bitcoin because they simple think that they use a Bitcoin wallet and dont know that they really use an altcoin wallet.

[1715108060]

1715108060

[1715108060]

1715108060

[1715108060]

1715108060

[ologoff]

Shame on bitcoin.com ... Apple should cancel their app from the store...
Atm, for a newbie, BRD wallet is the best choice imho

[AdolfinWolf]

Shame on bitcoin.com ... Apple should cancel their app from the store...
Atm, for a newbie, BRD wallet is the best choice imho

This is not the interface of an iPhone, but rather what looks like some kind of android. But yeah, if this app also exists in the app store, it should definitely be removed.

Bitcoin.com has completely transform to e fraud wallet and imo everyone must report it. New users lost their bitcoin because they simple think that they use a Bitcoin wallet and dont know that they really use an altcoin wallet.

Is this even the real bitcoin.com wallet?



This is how it looks given in the source below


http://bitcoinist.com/1000-people-join-crypto-industry-figures-sue-bitcoin-com-fraud/


I believe that there's also a lawsuit starting against them due to them constantly advertising Bcash as the real bitcoin, see http://bitcoinist.com/1000-people-join-crypto-industry-figures-sue-bitcoin-com-fraud/

[chek2fire]

here is the link for everyone that want to report this fraud to google

https://support.google.com/googleplay/android-developer/contact/takedown

[franky1]

yet another topic trying to get core centralists to own "bitcoin"

so here we ago again
NO ONE ONES BITCOIN. and core definetly should not. this is all just a ploy to hand the brand and trademark to one central team

bitcoin is like dollar

america have dollar
australia have dollar
canada have dollar

in normal conversation a canadaian CAN happily say they have dollars in their pocket but it aint U.S dollar
in normal conversation a american CAN happily say they have dollars in their pocket but it aint canadian dollar

an australian forex CAN put.. "buy dollars or buy U.S dollars"
an american forex CAN put.. "buy dollars or buy A.U dollars"
a bitcoin core exchange can put buy bitcoin or buy bitcoin cash
a bitcoin cash exchange can put buy bitcoin or buy bitcoin core

EG
if a european wants dollars, so the conversation is.. "do you want U.S at ~0.8Eur/$ or A.U at ~0.6/$"
if a fiat holder wants bitcoin, so the conversation is.. "do you want core at ~$9,000k or cash ~$900"

so the conversation is there is U.S dollar AND A.U dollar
so the conversation is there is bitcoin core and bitcoin cash

there would only be fraud if Australia was selling australian dollar at the american dollar rate

there would only be fraud if bitcoin cash was selling bitcoin cash coins at the bitcoin core rate

an american can say "i got 99 dollars but a A.U dollar aint one"
an australian can say "i got 99 dollars but a U.S dollar aint one"

an american cannot say "australia is fake,fraud, non existant, a myth, a dream they dont have dollars"

once you stop being a foolish sheep protecting core as a centralist group... and instead ignore the core team and think about DECENTRALISATION and noone should own bitcoin. then you see that this social drama of lawsuits/banning/reporting. is just cencorsip to drive out consensus/decentralisation/competition.. and just promote centralisation towards the core team becoming a monarchy

so, how did it all occur you may ask..

the 2017 event was a bilateral split instigated by the core team and their partners (blockstream: samson mow... Bloq:jgarzic) to do a bilateral split where BOTH SIDES become an altcoin
yes both blockstream guys and bloq guys(the main paid devs involved in core) who are all paid by the same investors created both bitcoin core and bitcoin cash
yes we all know that the core team are point fingers at jihan and ver.. but it was actually BLOQ that made bitcoin cash.. yes thats how desparate to cause propaganda they are that they wont admit their own partner made it

anyway the bilateral fork..
unlike UNILATERAL forks like clams. .

its not a
_________________core
            \_________cash
(unilateral)

or a
             _________core
_______/_________cash
(unilateral)

but was a
           __________core
______/
          \__________cash
(biilateral)

yes BOTH sides split

this whole thing would not have happened if the bilateral split did not occur and REAL consensus was used. but no.. core hated that they only had 35% of the vote and so forced a bilateral split using their partner and then tried blaming a third person.
(facepalm) at cores shadiness to try making bitcoin centralised


so. the solution is simple..
when thinking of bitcoin. think of it as the same conversation you would have travelling around the world and talking about dollar.
"is that U.S, A.U. CAD your talking about/want"

then things become simple

if anyone sent coins to the wrong address.. just get the private key from the wallet and use it on the correct wallet for the coin that got sent

as for the lawsuit.
(analogy) i doubt anyone bought a A.U dollar at a U.S rate
(analogy) i doubt anyone bought a U.S dollar at a A.U rate

i doubt anyone bought a bitcoin cash coin at a bitcoin core rate
i doubt anyone bought a bitcoin core coin at a bitcoin cash rate
so no fraud.

[chek2fire]

Google Play policy that the bitcoin.com app is violating: 
 

> We don’t allow apps that use another app or entity’s brand, title, logo, or name in a manner that may result in misleading users. Don’t try to imply an endorsement or relationship with another entity where none exists. 
 Impersonation can occur even if there isn’t an intent to deceive, so please be careful when referencing any brands that do not belong to you. This applies even if that brand doesn’t yet have a presence on Google Play.

[Meysa_richa]

It is very dangerous when used by many people, and this should be quickly resolved properly, and we should spread this news so that people understand and do not do any fatal thing.

[odolvlobo]

I would like a better explanation of what the problem is.

How exactly are bitcoins being lost? You can't send BTC from a BCH wallet, and if BTC are sent to your BCH wallet, you can still recover your BTC because you have the private key.

Google Play policy that the bitcoin.com app is violating:  
  

> We don’t allow apps that use another app or entity’s brand, ...

Sorry. There is no "Bitcoin" brand, and even if there were it seems to me that Bitcoin.com would have a good claim to it.

[vibingpositively]

They tried pulling this stunt on Bitcoin.com website and only under pressure from lawsuits did they change it. I get it if you believe in BCash as your vision Mr. Ver but stop misleading innocent individuals to further your cause. You sir disgust me.

[pooya87]

How exactly are bitcoins being lost? You can't send BTC from a BCH wallet, and if BTC are sent to your BCH wallet, you can still recover your BTC because you have the private key.

it is not technically lost but to a beginner it is lost.
a newbie goes to a site which he thinks is a real bitcoin site (since it is .com) then buys what the site is calling "bitcoin" (which is in reality bitcoin cash) and sends it to his bitcoin address (real bitcoin in this case). then he waits and waits and it never arrives. he contacts the support and they tell him they have sent the bitcoins (but in reality they have sent him bitcoin cash).

then he has to come to reddit, bitcointalk,... and begs others to help him understand what is going on. finally he has to guess what the problem is and guide him through extracting the private keys from his bitcoin wallet then import it in a bitcoin cash wallet to see the altcoin they sent him in place of bitcoin.

that is when he realizes what he received is not even worth nearly as much as bitcoin. such newbies usually are disappointed in the whole bitcoin thing and go away with a big loss.

[Spontebob]

Google Play policy that the bitcoin.com app is violating: 
 

> We don’t allow apps that use another app or entity’s brand, title, logo, or name in a manner that may result in misleading users. Don’t try to imply an endorsement or relationship with another entity where none exists. 
 Impersonation can occur even if there isn’t an intent to deceive, so please be careful when referencing any brands that do not belong to you. This applies even if that brand doesn’t yet have a presence on Google Play.

Posting this on Bitcoin Discussion is very helpful. Thank you. This matter should be solved as soon as possible or more bitcoin users may become a victim. I will report it.

[maslovp]

I heard that the owner is getting sued and he already started making changes on his website. I hope he is punished for fooling new investors.

[SUDARMONO]

I strongly agree with your opinion, because if this in let will be much harm to its users, and I will take action to support you.

[ologoff]

Shame on bitcoin.com ... Apple should cancel their app from the store...
Atm, for a newbie, BRD wallet is the best choice imho

This is not the interface of an iPhone, but rather what looks like some kind of android. But yeah, if this app also exists in the app store, it should definitely be removed.

It's the same, this app should be ban for all the stores!

[zeref dragneel]

such a shame..
hey who is the uploader of the app?is it from the official bitcoin forum?
well I think its not...there is so many apps in play store that seem trusted and they require 5stars to enter the app..that how they collect 5 stars..and then they will collect info from your phone..
this is disgusting.
and another catagory is, these wallet apps..it may cost your whole btc or other currencies.