Bitcoin Forum
December 18, 2017, 11:27:18 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Does Bitcoin's Reward Need to Halve at All?  (Read 737 times)
theonewhowaskazu
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448


View Profile
November 28, 2013, 03:35:00 AM
 #1

Assume that there was just a flat reward of Bitcoins per block.
Inflation:
First year: 100%
Second year: 50%
Third Year: 33%
Fourth Year: 25%
Fifth Year: 20%
Sixth Year: 17%
Seventh Year: 14%
Eight Year: 12.5%
Ninth Year: 11%
Tenth Year: 10%
...
Year 30: 3%
Year 100: 1%

As you can see, even without halving of block rewards, and without a fixed max number of coins, inflation naturally tapers off asymptotically. Would this potentially better help miners, reduce the chances of deflation (or at least make the deflation basically minute), smooth the huge price increases that happen during the early years as people adopt the coin, reduce the huge 'unfair' advantage that some people complain Early Adopters have, and generally help Bitcoin?

Not saying I'm in favour of changing the protocol, it would be way too big of a change to make sense, and for a fairly small potential benefit, but still its a fairly interesting question.

1513596438
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1513596438

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1513596438
Reply with quote  #2

1513596438
Report to moderator
1513596438
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1513596438

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1513596438
Reply with quote  #2

1513596438
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1513596438
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1513596438

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1513596438
Reply with quote  #2

1513596438
Report to moderator
1513596438
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1513596438

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1513596438
Reply with quote  #2

1513596438
Report to moderator
Littleshop
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1316



View Profile WWW
November 28, 2013, 03:50:42 AM
 #2

Assume that there was just a flat reward of Bitcoins per block.
Inflation:
First year: 100%
Second year: 50%
Third Year: 33%
Fourth Year: 25%
Fifth Year: 20%
Sixth Year: 17%
Seventh Year: 14%
Eight Year: 12.5%
Ninth Year: 11%
Tenth Year: 10%
...
Year 30: 3%
Year 100: 1%

As you can see, even without halving of block rewards, and without a fixed max number of coins, inflation naturally tapers off asymptotically. Would this potentially better help miners, reduce the chances of deflation (or at least make the deflation basically minute), smooth the huge price increases that happen during the early years as people adopt the coin, reduce the huge 'unfair' advantage that some people complain Early Adopters have, and generally help Bitcoin?

Not saying I'm in favour of changing the protocol, it would be way too big of a change to make sense, and for a fairly small potential benefit, but still its a fairly interesting question.

I think the block reward halving was responsible for making Bitcoin much better.  Lower costs for savers in the earlier years.  Now less BTC printing to pay for the network but enough to make it secure.

Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!