Bitcoin Forum
April 27, 2024, 01:23:41 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1] 2 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Is it true that 90% of current Bitcoins are owned by 50 people?  (Read 1747 times)
revans (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 250


View Profile
November 29, 2013, 05:14:05 PM
 #1

I read this somewhere but the claim was not sourced. Is it true? If not, what's the actually distribution like amongst top 50 holders?
1714181021
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714181021

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714181021
Reply with quote  #2

1714181021
Report to moderator
1714181021
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714181021

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714181021
Reply with quote  #2

1714181021
Report to moderator
"Bitcoin: mining our own business since 2009" -- Pieter Wuille
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714181021
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714181021

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714181021
Reply with quote  #2

1714181021
Report to moderator
1714181021
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714181021

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714181021
Reply with quote  #2

1714181021
Report to moderator
CoinCidental
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1316
Merit: 1000


Si vis pacem, para bellum


View Profile
November 29, 2013, 05:26:35 PM
 #2

http://bitcoinrichlist.com/top100
fred1111
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 160
Merit: 101


View Profile
November 29, 2013, 05:26:46 PM
 #3

At one point it was true. I suggest taking a look at this thread:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=316297.0
fred1111
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 160
Merit: 101


View Profile
November 29, 2013, 05:28:42 PM
 #4

At one point it was true. I suggest taking a look at this thread:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=316297.0
However, as the value of BTC increases, the large holders are incited to diversify their investment (usually via USD), so the distribution gets more even with time.
mb300sd
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000

Drunk Posts


View Profile WWW
November 29, 2013, 05:30:23 PM
 #5


Remember that its possible quite a few of those addresses may have been lost.

1D7FJWRzeKa4SLmTznd3JpeNU13L1ErEco
revans (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 250


View Profile
November 29, 2013, 05:33:54 PM
 #6

At one point it was true. I suggest taking a look at this thread:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=316297.0
However, as the value of BTC increases, the large holders are incited to diversify their investment (usually via USD), so the distribution gets more even with time.

Assuming they can continue to find greater fools.

It could be said that Bitcoin will either continually increases in value, or collapse to nothing. As soon as there is any protracted period  of price stability, all the speculative capital gets withdrawn and goes in search in a new bubble (Litecoin perhaps). The only way to prevent that is an ever increasing price, but that's not sustainable, especially as Bitcoin is not making much progress in terms of merchant acceptance.  
Okurkabinladin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 506



View Profile
November 29, 2013, 05:34:53 PM
 #7

I read this somewhere but the claim was not sourced. Is it true? If not, what's the actually distribution like amongst top 50 holders?

Satoshi alone owns million+ coins, but he hasn´t touched his wallet since 2010. Those coins could be lost for all we know.
revans (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 250


View Profile
November 29, 2013, 05:37:54 PM
 #8

I read this somewhere but the claim was not sourced. Is it true? If not, what's the actually distribution like amongst top 50 holders?

Satoshi alone owns million+ coins, but he hasn´t touched his wallet since 2010. Those coins could be lost for all we know.

That alone is surely a roadblock in terms of Bitcoin ever becoming anything like the ubiquitous store of value and medium of exchange its fans hope? If those coins were ever dumped, Bitcoin would be back down to a fraction of a cent.
PenAndPaper
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 250


View Profile
November 29, 2013, 05:42:17 PM
 #9

I read this somewhere but the claim was not sourced. Is it true? If not, what's the actually distribution like amongst top 50 holders?

Satoshi alone owns million+ coins, but he hasn´t touched his wallet since 2010. Those coins could be lost for all we know.

I don't think its likely for satoshi to lost his bitcoins.  Tongue
Okurkabinladin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 506



View Profile
November 29, 2013, 05:44:42 PM
 #10

I read this somewhere but the claim was not sourced. Is it true? If not, what's the actually distribution like amongst top 50 holders?

Satoshi alone owns million+ coins, but he hasn´t touched his wallet since 2010. Those coins could be lost for all we know.

I don't think its likely for satoshi to lost his bitcoins.  Tongue

I can spell it out for you. He could be dead, thus billion+ dollars are just lying there like some mythical treasure straight out of Tolkien.
freakying99
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 429
Merit: 250


Pythagoras and Plato are my brothers.


View Profile
November 29, 2013, 05:47:38 PM
 #11

I read this somewhere but the claim was not sourced. Is it true? If not, what's the actually distribution like amongst top 50 holders?

Satoshi alone owns million+ coins, but he hasn´t touched his wallet since 2010. Those coins could be lost for all we know.

That alone is surely a roadblock in terms of Bitcoin ever becoming anything like the ubiquitous store of value and medium of exchange its fans hope? If those coins were ever dumped, Bitcoin would be back down to a fraction of a cent.


Please let it happen! It would be race who adds USD to exchanges sonner to have extremly cheap bitcoins! Soon the price woud be back  Wink
MatTheCat
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 840
Merit: 1000


View Profile
November 29, 2013, 05:56:49 PM
 #12

I read this somewhere but the claim was not sourced. Is it true? If not, what's the actually distribution like amongst top 50 holders?

Whether it is true or not, due to increasing computational demands of mining the lionshare of the next 11 million will be mined, and possibly held by large scale corporate or even governmental (China i am thinking off) run operations.


Kraken Account, Robbed/Emptied. Kraken say "Fuck you, its your loss": https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1559553.msg15656643#msg15656643

Bitfinex victims. DO NOT TOUCH THE BFX TOKEN! Start moving it around, or trading it, and you will be construed as having accepted it as an alternative means of payment to your USD, BTC, etc.
Melbustus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1722
Merit: 1003



View Profile
November 29, 2013, 05:56:53 PM
 #13

It's tough to ID the addresses. On one side, people can obviously control more than one address. On the other, a lot of the big addresses are likely businesses that hold funds for lots of customers; case in point: that ~195,000 BTC transaction the other day is thought to be Bitstamp....so that single address, one of the biggest, really belongs to thousands of people.

Bitcoin is the first monetary system to credibly offer perfect information to all economic participants.
JTrain_51
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 10


View Profile
November 29, 2013, 05:58:37 PM
 #14


Just take a look at this thread
Im pretty sure that the guy at silkroad owns around 1 third of all btc
fghj
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 65
Merit: 10


View Profile
November 29, 2013, 06:07:01 PM
 #15

As soon as there is any protracted period  of price stability, all the speculative capital gets withdrawn and goes in search in a new bubble
Are we talking about the same bitcoin? Last time I checked every longer period of stability ended in massive (~20x) rally.
Cyberdyne
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 630
Merit: 500



View Profile
November 29, 2013, 06:08:30 PM
 #16


Just take a look at this thread
Im pretty sure that the guy at silkroad owns around 1 third of all btc

You mean the FBI guy?
revans (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 250


View Profile
November 29, 2013, 06:10:34 PM
 #17

As soon as there is any protracted period  of price stability, all the speculative capital gets withdrawn and goes in search in a new bubble
Are we talking about the same bitcoin? Last time I checked every longer period of stability ended in massive (~20x) rally.

In which case it isn't stability is it?
CoinCidental
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1316
Merit: 1000


Si vis pacem, para bellum


View Profile
November 29, 2013, 06:11:52 PM
 #18


Remember that its possible quite a few of those addresses may have been lost.

you can see the date the top 50+ richest addresses were last accesed
 (most  or almost all of them within this month,many just yesterday or even today )
fghj
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 65
Merit: 10


View Profile
November 29, 2013, 06:34:43 PM
 #19

As soon as there is any protracted period  of price stability, all the speculative capital gets withdrawn and goes in search in a new bubble
Are we talking about the same bitcoin? Last time I checked every longer period of stability ended in massive (~20x) rally.

In which case it isn't stability is it?
How about spring 2012? For two months rate was ~5.1 it was eternity in bitcoin time there were people trying to get excited when rate moved 0.03$ (0.006%) that's less volatility in BTC/USD than it is normal between fiat currencies.
I see that you registered 11 April, something tells me you must be very butthurt.
mb300sd
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000

Drunk Posts


View Profile WWW
November 29, 2013, 06:35:42 PM
 #20


Remember that its possible quite a few of those addresses may have been lost.

you can see the date the top 50+ richest addresses were last accesed
 (most  or almost all of them within this month,many just yesterday or even today )

That date is the last received, anyone can send a tiny amount to those addresses. The last spent date is far more useful.

1D7FJWRzeKa4SLmTznd3JpeNU13L1ErEco
Pages: [1] 2 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!