CP3U SHA Scrypt Quark [XMR-XDN-BCN-BTC-LTC-QRK] win64 CPU Miner i3i5i7 Bulldozer

[Palmdetroit]

False + ?
Ad-Aware    Trojan.Generic.9705038    20131203
Agnitum    Riskware.BitCoinMiner!mabHpPndSNc    20131202
AhnLab-V3       20131202
AntiVir    TR/BitCoinMiner.Gen    20131203
Antiy-AVL       20131129
Avast    Win32:Crypt-OSW [Trj]    20131203
AVG       20131202
Baidu-International    Trojan.Win32.Win64.aYo    20131202
BitDefender    Trojan.Generic.9705038    20131203
Bkav       20131129
ByteHero       20131127
CAT-QuickHeal       20131202
ClamAV       20131203
Commtouch       20131203
Comodo    UnclassifiedMalware    20131203
DrWeb       20131203
Emsisoft    Trojan.Generic.9705038 (B)    20131203
ESET-NOD32    a variant of Win64/BitCoinMiner.E    20131202
F-Prot       20131203
F-Secure    Trojan.Generic.9705038    20131203
Fortinet    W64/BitCoinMiner.E    20131202
GData    Trojan.Generic.9705038    20131203
Ikarus    Win32.Crypt    20131203
Jiangmin       20131202
K7AntiVirus    Trojan ( 004828c81 )    20131202
K7GW    Trojan ( 004828c81 )    20131202
Kaspersky    not-a-virus:RiskTool.Win64.BitCoinMiner.i    20131203
Kingsoft       20130829
Malwarebytes       20131203
McAfee    RDN/Generic PUP.x!blp    20131203
McAfee-GW-Edition       20131202
Microsoft       20131203
MicroWorld-eScan    Trojan.Generic.9705038    20131203
NANO-Antivirus       20131203
Norman    Troj_Generic.QRECX    20131202
nProtect       20131202
Panda    Trj/CI.A    20131202
Rising       20131203
Sophos       20131203
SUPERAntiSpyware       20131202
Symantec    Bitcoinminer    20131203
TheHacker       20131202
TotalDefense       20131203
TrendMicro    TROJ_GEN.R0CBC0OK913    20131203
TrendMicro-HouseCall    TROJ_GEN.R0CBC0OIS13    20131203
VBA32       20131202
VIPRE    Trojan.Win32.Generic!BT    20131203
ViRobot       20131202

I would not follow that link or repost the url

[1715224834]

1715224834

[1715224834]

1715224834

[1715224834]

1715224834

[Palmdetroit]

Does it not report the successful share?

It reports like this:

Code:

[2013-11-30 23:10:22] accepted: 219/220 (99.55%), 713.56 khash/s (yay!!!)

thank you, so its not working here, tried x64 and legacy, intel i5 2nd with p2ppool as you described

Are you seeing

Code:

[2013-11-30 23:35:25] Stratum detected new block
[2013-11-30 23:35:43] Stratum detected new block
[2013-11-30 23:35:56] Stratum detected new block

Those should go by pretty quick if its working correctly.

Try it with http://qrk.coinmine.pl/

I put the batch in the files (may need to dl again) to mine with this pool now as it seems to have better latency. Also check your CPU usage.. should be running near 100% with default settings

Im using minerd_w32_sse3.exe for my Q6600 and it shows the hashes and speed on every thead, i've created another worker for my laptop which is an i5-2410M 2.4Ghz to try to speed things up (just temporarily, while it's still somewhat minable, I dont wanto damage it). I was planning to leave it for the night and see if I wake up with results, but im only seeing "Stratum detected new block" all the time and nothing else. Is this normal? Why your version of minerd doesn't show speed and hashes? It would be better, it feels like you are doing something, since pool information on the websites is useless since it's always lagged.

Btw, about false positives, just always download the stuff from a thrusted source, but most antivirus are throwing miners as trojans these days.

Because I put the -q flag in the command line which means quiet, simply remove -q to see the hashes and madness.  With -q you only see stratum and shares submitted.

On laptops I would recommend using -t x , where x is cores-1 .. or have very good cooling!

[giveBTCpls]

False + ?
Ad-Aware    Trojan.Generic.9705038    20131203
Agnitum    Riskware.BitCoinMiner!mabHpPndSNc    20131202
AhnLab-V3       20131202
AntiVir    TR/BitCoinMiner.Gen    20131203
Antiy-AVL       20131129
Avast    Win32:Crypt-OSW [Trj]    20131203
AVG       20131202
Baidu-International    Trojan.Win32.Win64.aYo    20131202
BitDefender    Trojan.Generic.9705038    20131203
Bkav       20131129
ByteHero       20131127
CAT-QuickHeal       20131202
ClamAV       20131203
Commtouch       20131203
Comodo    UnclassifiedMalware    20131203
DrWeb       20131203
Emsisoft    Trojan.Generic.9705038 (B)    20131203
ESET-NOD32    a variant of Win64/BitCoinMiner.E    20131202
F-Prot       20131203
F-Secure    Trojan.Generic.9705038    20131203
Fortinet    W64/BitCoinMiner.E    20131202
GData    Trojan.Generic.9705038    20131203
Ikarus    Win32.Crypt    20131203
Jiangmin       20131202
K7AntiVirus    Trojan ( 004828c81 )    20131202
K7GW    Trojan ( 004828c81 )    20131202
Kaspersky    not-a-virus:RiskTool.Win64.BitCoinMiner.i    20131203
Kingsoft       20130829
Malwarebytes       20131203
McAfee    RDN/Generic PUP.x!blp    20131203
McAfee-GW-Edition       20131202
Microsoft       20131203
MicroWorld-eScan    Trojan.Generic.9705038    20131203
NANO-Antivirus       20131203
Norman    Troj_Generic.QRECX    20131202
nProtect       20131202
Panda    Trj/CI.A    20131202
Rising       20131203
Sophos       20131203
SUPERAntiSpyware       20131202
Symantec    Bitcoinminer    20131203
TheHacker       20131202
TotalDefense       20131203
TrendMicro    TROJ_GEN.R0CBC0OK913    20131203
TrendMicro-HouseCall    TROJ_GEN.R0CBC0OIS13    20131203
VBA32       20131202
VIPRE    Trojan.Win32.Generic!BT    20131203
ViRobot       20131202

I would not follow that link or repost the url

Is this legit?

http://www.share-online.biz/dl/L78K8NRMGUG

I got it from there:

Thanks to Neisklar for releasing a version of CPU miner for Quark.

Announcement thread:
http://forum.quarkcoin.org/Thread-ANN-poolers-cpuminer-with-quarkcoin-support

Source code here:
http://www.share-online.biz/download.php?id=CU5H5NRMJK

The win executables took some time to compile, they are linkes in the announcement thread, and here:
Win64: http://www.share-online.biz/download.php?id=E7OXBNRMUU
Win32: http://www.share-online.biz/download.php?id=L78K8NRMGUG

Since the quark-algo is pure plain c, i compiled it for different processor/instructionsets, just pick one that works best for you. AVX better than SSE and so on. Win64 will definatly gain heavy speed improvements: On my old core2 laptop, I had a win32_sse3 run with around 9-12 khash/s per core. With w64_sse4 i got around 22-26 khash/s per core.

Is it faster? Github?

Yes definatly, one core on wallet: ~11kHash/s, w64_sse4 one core: ~23kHash/s
So at least on my testing machine and win64: around 100% gain

Github will come hopefully after the weekend, and hopefully coreectly setup as fork.

I don't think it is significantly faster, but you can use it to mine on a pool. Neisklar has also setup a p2pool for Quark here:

http://176.221.46.81:8372/static/

See above:) It's waaaaayyyy faster:)

The pool is for now only a standalone p2pool. The blocktimes in the stats page are hours off, but following the link into the block explorer shows the right times in UTC.
I hope to have next week some time to create/setup a traditional pool.

https://github.com/uncle-bob

for nearly a 30% improvement in hash rate

Yeah nice, taking it out of the loop, need to try out whats the speedgain in the cpuminer.
I wonder if we get even more gain (since memory is not an issue) if we create for multiple times used hash functions in one hash run, distinct contexts, and then combine them in one big struct, so thats one big continous block of memory which can be copied with one single memcpy call, instead now 9 calls for smaller blocks.

[Martijnvdc]

Any Linux version?

[georgem]

Thanks for this miner. Works great with coinmine.pl

I have successfully tested a vishera bulldozer, plus an older 4-core phenom X2

The older phenom needs the legacy.zip, or else it will crash.

Now both workers are visible in coinmine.pl but somehow coinmine.pl shows both workers with the same kilohash?

Strange. I get about 1.5 megahash with the bulldozer alone. But when I add the 4-core-phenom, coinmine shows
the exact same value (of like 800 kilohash) for each worker.

But the miner on my 4-core-phenom shows an average of 3-400 kilohash (in the commandline), so I don't understand what happens
here.

Maybe have to let it run for a day to see better average value at coinmine.pl.

[georgem]

hm, now my bulldozer is listed as inactive on coinmine.pl,...
But the commandline in bulldozer is still running, and showing correct values.

Is there something I have to adjust when I run many computers in the same home network?
Like different ports per computer or something?

[jaycee1974]

False + ?
Ad-Aware    Trojan.Generic.9705038    20131203
Agnitum    Riskware.BitCoinMiner!mabHpPndSNc    20131202
AhnLab-V3       20131202
AntiVir    TR/BitCoinMiner.Gen    20131203
Antiy-AVL       20131129
Avast    Win32:Crypt-OSW [Trj]    20131203
AVG       20131202
Baidu-International    Trojan.Win32.Win64.aYo    20131202
BitDefender    Trojan.Generic.9705038    20131203
Bkav       20131129
ByteHero       20131127
CAT-QuickHeal       20131202
ClamAV       20131203
Commtouch       20131203
Comodo    UnclassifiedMalware    20131203
DrWeb       20131203
Emsisoft    Trojan.Generic.9705038 (B)    20131203
ESET-NOD32    a variant of Win64/BitCoinMiner.E    20131202
F-Prot       20131203
F-Secure    Trojan.Generic.9705038    20131203
Fortinet    W64/BitCoinMiner.E    20131202
GData    Trojan.Generic.9705038    20131203
Ikarus    Win32.Crypt    20131203
Jiangmin       20131202
K7AntiVirus    Trojan ( 004828c81 )    20131202
K7GW    Trojan ( 004828c81 )    20131202
Kaspersky    not-a-virus:RiskTool.Win64.BitCoinMiner.i    20131203
Kingsoft       20130829
Malwarebytes       20131203
McAfee    RDN/Generic PUP.x!blp    20131203
McAfee-GW-Edition       20131202
Microsoft       20131203
MicroWorld-eScan    Trojan.Generic.9705038    20131203
NANO-Antivirus       20131203
Norman    Troj_Generic.QRECX    20131202
nProtect       20131202
Panda    Trj/CI.A    20131202
Rising       20131203
Sophos       20131203
SUPERAntiSpyware       20131202
Symantec    Bitcoinminer    20131203
TheHacker       20131202
TotalDefense       20131203
TrendMicro    TROJ_GEN.R0CBC0OK913    20131203
TrendMicro-HouseCall    TROJ_GEN.R0CBC0OIS13    20131203
VBA32       20131202
VIPRE    Trojan.Win32.Generic!BT    20131203
ViRobot       20131202

I would not follow that link or repost the url

LOL, every minerd.exe will give on many virusscanners results, even Urs, see here:

SHA256:   80c3daa3bab0105ead192bfdbd423c120a06bda6f7fac1d7332f201dc59012f9
Dateiname:   i7.zip
Erkennungsrate:    9 / 48
Analyse-Datum:    2013-12-07 12:31:22 UTC ( vor 0 Minuten )

Avast    Win32:Crypt-OSW [Trj]    20131207
Baidu-International    Trojan.Win64.BitCoinMiner.E    20131207
ESET-NOD32    a variant of Win64/BitCoinMiner.E    20131207
Ikarus    Win32.Crypt    20131207
K7AntiVirus    Trojan ( 004828c81 )    20131207
McAfee    RDN/Generic.dx!c2i    20131207
Symantec    Bitcoinminer    20131207
TrendMicro-HouseCall    TROJ_GEN.F47V1130    20131207
VIPRE    Trojan.Win32.Generic!BT    20131207


But thats the point :

NOTICE: Results are not 100% accurate and can be reported as a false positive by some scannerswhen and if malware is found. Please judge these results for yourself.  


links:

http://r.virscan.org/report/5832ee85219711b825f9208fd9ff5676.html

https://www.virustotal.com/de/file/80c3daa3bab0105ead192bfdbd423c120a06bda6f7fac1d7332f201dc59012f9/analysis/1386419482/

[JuanHungLo]

hm, now my bulldozer is listed as inactive on coinmine.pl,...
But the commandline in bulldozer is still running, and showing correct values.

Is there something I have to adjust when I run many computers in the same home network?
Like different ports per computer or something?

I came to the same conclusions you are.  However, the truth is different.  What I concluded after a week of observing is that your worker may not show as being "online" unless it just recently got a "block" accepted.  As for the khash/rates being off or not assigned correctly, I totally agree and I am still puzzled by it.  I would love for someone who is informed to comment, too.

[Palmdetroit]

hm, now my bulldozer is listed as inactive on coinmine.pl,...
But the commandline in bulldozer is still running, and showing correct values.

Is there something I have to adjust when I run many computers in the same home network?
Like different ports per computer or something?

I came to the same conclusions you are.  However, the truth is different.  What I concluded after a week of observing is that your worker may not show as being "online" unless it just recently got a "block" accepted.  As for the khash/rates being off or not assigned correctly, I totally agree and I am still puzzled by it.  I would love for someone who is informed to comment, too.

The difficulty requirement is quite high now, I assume the pool raised it to lower demand on it's servers, since they were having problems earlier this week. This causes higher variance where you will show offline (if you haven't gotten share recently) or a very high mining rate, or low depending on how many shares you have submitted in the time frame the pool uses to calculate active hashrate, so this is normal

You don't need separate ports but you can try all using one worker (to 'smooth out' variance)

Pool is down for maint. now it seems so not sure if you can change the time window or not.

[Palmdetroit]

Thanks for this miner. Works great with coinmine.pl

I have successfully tested a vishera bulldozer, plus an older 4-core phenom X2

The older phenom needs the legacy.zip, or else it will crash.

Now both workers are visible in coinmine.pl but somehow coinmine.pl shows both workers with the same kilohash?

Strange. I get about 1.5 megahash with the bulldozer alone. But when I add the 4-core-phenom, coinmine shows
the exact same value (of like 800 kilohash) for each worker.

But the miner on my 4-core-phenom shows an average of 3-400 kilohash (in the commandline), so I don't understand what happens
here.

Maybe have to let it run for a day to see better average value at coinmine.pl.

The rate shown in the miner is more accurate than the pool.  What hardware/cpu/settings are getting 1.5mh ?

[Palmdetroit]

Bulldozer Improved added.
i3i5i7 Improved added.
Should add 10%+ speed .

https://sourceforge.net/projects/philosopherstone/files/QRK/

Could use some feedback for improvements over previous miner (speed increases).

[JuanHungLo]

I appreciate the updates but my machines are so old they are all using the legacy miner.  Any updates for that one?

[Palmdetroit]

I appreciate the updates but my machines are so old they are all using the legacy miner.  Any updates for that one?

Any luck with win64all_improved?

Here is experimental version, but I have no idea if it will show any improvements, let me know and will delete if not
https://sourceforge.net/projects/philosopherstone/files/QRK/

[JuanHungLo]

No, I just tried the 64 improved, it starts, then quickly crashes on my fastest processor the Phenom II X4 940 BE.

I'll try the experimental version.

[JuanHungLo]

Ok, the experimental legacy version runs at 109.75 khash/sec per processor.

The original runs at 120.76 khash/sec per processor on the Phenom II X4 940 BE.

[Palmdetroit]

Ok, the experimental legacy version runs at 109.75 khash/sec per processor.

The original runs at 120.76 khash/sec per processor on the Phenom II X4 940 BE.

try the AMD legacy one and post results =

[JuanHungLo]

Ok, the experimental legacy version runs at 109.75 khash/sec per processor.

The original runs at 120.76 khash/sec per processor on the Phenom II X4 940 BE.

try the AMD legacy one and post results =

111.52 khash/sec per processor

[Atomar]

I have a question: I have a Intel Core i7 2600 3.4 GHz CPU. Which mine would be the "best"

[Palmdetroit]

Ok, the experimental legacy version runs at 109.75 khash/sec per processor.

The original runs at 120.76 khash/sec per processor on the Phenom II X4 940 BE.

try the AMD legacy one and post results =

111.52 khash/sec per processor

Use the best one I'll delete the experimental

[Palmdetroit]

I have a question: I have a Intel Core i7 2600 3.4 GHz CPU. Which mine would be the "best"

Test out i3i5i7_improved and old i7 one , see which reports higher.