Bitcoin Forum
September 24, 2024, 03:19:03 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: ASICminer Blad v2 and mining_proxy "WARNING" error?  (Read 1075 times)
aznatama (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 167
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 01, 2013, 12:38:37 AM
Last edit: December 01, 2013, 12:58:11 AM by aznatama
 #1

I hooked up and configured 10 blades which are utilizing a proxy on my computer... The problem is the proxy output is quite confusing.  It seems like the blades will ALL switch over from one proxy to the other (configure needs 2 servers in blade setup, so I have 2 proxies running, pointing at different pool servers for same pool)

I am using the -q (quiet) command, and am getting a consistent listings of this:

Code:
2013-11-30 18:52:26,188 WARNING proxy # [0ms] Share from 'x' accepted, diff 128
2013-11-30 18:52:26,190 WARNING proxy # [0ms] Share from 'x' accepted, diff 128
2013-11-30 18:52:26,197 WARNING proxy # [0ms] Share from 'x' accepted, diff 128
2013-11-30 18:52:26,200 WARNING proxy # [0ms] Share from 'x' accepted, diff 128


I also get this error w/ the proxy after running it for an hr.

Code:
--- <exception caught here> ---
  File "twisted\internet\defer.pyo", line 134, in maybeDeferred

  File "mining_libs\worker_registry.pyo", line 37, in authorize

  File "stratum\socket_transport.pyo", line 93, in rpc

stratum.custom_exceptions.TransportException: Not connected
Unhandled error in Deferred:
Unhandled Error
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "twisted\web\server.pyo", line 156, in process

  File "twisted\web\server.pyo", line 191, in render

  File "twisted\web\resource.pyo", line 216, in render

  File "mining_libs\getwork_listener.pyo", line 163, in render_POST

My pool, GHash, sees all the work submitted, but it seems like I'm submitting quite a good amount of stale shares... Anyone know how to fix this??

Difficulty is set at 128, as recommended by the ghash FAQ for 100+gh/s.  
vm1990
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1540
Merit: 1002



View Profile
December 01, 2013, 10:26:03 AM
 #2

lower the difficulty to 64 or 32 most people with blades use a difficulty of 12... the 1st screen shot is normal not sure why it put warning in it

aznatama (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 167
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 02, 2013, 10:16:13 PM
 #3

The recommended difficulty for 100gh+ is 128, so I just used that.  It seems to give me a better overall hash rate w/ my pool.

I changed over to 32-bit bfgminer, and it's all working fine now.  However... I have an issue w/ the blades running slower than expected.  ??  (problem posted in new post, since it's now a different "topic"
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!