Reapplying as a merit source!

[Theb]

resorted to attempted to extort money out of people just to remove your red tag for them

Typical reaction. do you see anybody care about my red tags? are people lining up to pay me for red tag removal? did I ask for money for myself?
Typical reaction of account farmer/seller, are you farming accounts and cheating bounties with multiple accounts? because you'd think of me as
Extortionist and would accuse me because you don't want to pay a fine or report thousands of garbage posts. of course I'm racist, lier, extortionist.
Because if I'm to be taken seriously, you all would have to pack and leave, no more cheating for you guys.

Nope. If ever I will put a red tag to someone I'll only remove it if either the issue is resolve or if I tagged the wrong person, anything other than that I won't consider and also I won't ever give account farmers/sellers or scammers the option to pay me in order to remove the red tag I have given to them.

Tagging persons with the option to remove it for money makes the trust system worthless in the forum.

What makes the trust system worthless is allowing people to abuse their positions, when they see a long term signature campaign, they would use their influence to apply as many alt accounts as they can. bribing campaign managers with merits and DT2 status. using merits on threads of their own trades with other people. oh this guy just bought a physical Bitcoin from me, let me return the favour by giving him some merits.

That is a big accusation to make. Are you willing to involve names of members as well as evidence in the scam accusation board in order to prove what you are saying is true? Because if you know DT members who are enrolling their alt accounts now, you have the power to report them in the scam accusation board and put an end on their abuse of power.

[bill gator]

I would like to disavow and suggest against allowing digaran to be a merit source. They act a fool, cause drama and add nothing to the community of value. Them being a merit source would only serve as a detriment to the community. Digaran believes that being a merit source is reason to think they are above other users.

Cannot state enough how unfortunate it would be for digaran to be a merit source.

[digaran]

Snip.

Read previous posts before talking. pay per post campaigner.

[bill gator]

Read previous posts before talking.

I have done exactly as you have asked, only I've done so before posting the first time. Not sure what gave you the impression I didn't. You attempted to extort people, because you're (in your own words) a "beggar and a bigot" that'll do anything for a penny or a jump session. There isn't a single person around here that is willing to vouch for you or your behavior. Now you're asking to become a merit source, with your reasoning being "immunity" and without applying in the proper format. You'll notice a trend developing within this thread, maybe these quotes will help:

From what I've seen you can't possibly "behave maturely", or coherently.

Op either has mental issues or narcotics issues.

I have essentially ignored him except when he blatantly lies about me specifically.  

Something makes me think that Digaran made this thread and just left it to see how much controversy it would cause.

you want to see that you still somewhat have an authority in the forum which I personally don't think you need, especially when you resorted to attempted to extort money out of people just to remove your red tag for them.

What more is there to read? Nobody takes you seriously. I'm at a loss, it's clear you have given up even attempting to be humorous or entertaining at this point. Some of us are not keen to your gibberish, so you'll have to dumb it down for us. Are you yanking our chains?

Seems to me like you just didn't want to respond to this :

Because if you know DT members who are enrolling their alt accounts now, you have the power to report them in the scam accusation board and put an end on their abuse of power.

Since you have no evidence, and are talking out of your ass.

[jackg]

From what I've seen you can't possibly "behave maturely", or coherently.

Op either has mental issues or narcotics issues.

I have essentially ignored him except when he blatantly lies about me specifically.  

Something makes me think that Digaran made this thread and just left it to see how much controversy it would cause.

you want to see that you still somewhat have an authority in the forum which I personally don't think you need, especially when you resorted to attempted to extort money out of people just to remove your red tag for them.

What more is there to read? Nobody takes you seriously. I'm at a loss, it's clear you have given up even attempting to be humorous or entertaining at this point. Some of us are not keen to your gibberish, so you'll have to dumb it down for us. Are you yanking our chains?

Seems to me like you just didn't want to respond to this :

Because if you know DT members who are enrolling their alt accounts now, you have the power to report them in the scam accusation board and put an end on their abuse of power.

Since you have no evidence, and are talking out of your ass.

I often think Quicksy should make a school to teach wannabe's like digaran how to be entertaining while spreading fud (unless Quicksy is only entertaining because of some of the factual whistleblowing he actually does - im not saying all of it is true, there's an odd one now and then that gets proven though).

[digaran]

Consider this a bump. lol.
I would like to be a merit source no matter if I'm tagged red or not. I still do believe in theymos and this forum.

Also you should ignore my last edit of my thread on off topic section.

EDIT: @theymos, every time I try to do something, they would tag me, it's like they think that they own this community.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3853171.new#new

[r1s2g3]

Consider this a bump. lol.
I would like to be a merit source no matter if I'm tagged red or not. I still do believe in theymos and this forum.

Also you should ignore my last edit of my thread on off topic section.

EDIT: @theymos, every time I try to do something, they would tag me, it's like they think that they own this community.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3853171.new#new

Look like you got the first case for Red tag removal service. I will like to see that tx id in which you are paid .01 BTC.

PS: When Theymos clearly says that forum is doing fine and he do not need additional funds you are constantly thinking of funds.
      If things go on the ways as you think, then there will be a rate list for each crime instead of punishment.

[digaran]

Consider this a bump. lol.
I would like to be a merit source no matter if I'm tagged red or not. I still do believe in theymos and this forum.

Also you should ignore my last edit of my thread on off topic section.

EDIT: @theymos, every time I try to do something, they would tag me, it's like they think that they own this community.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3853171.new#new

Look like you got the first case for Red tag removal service. I will like to see that tx id in which you are paid .01 BTC.

PS: When Theymos clearly says that forum is doing fine and he do not need additional funds you are constantly thinking of funds.
      If things go on the ways as you think, then there will be a rate list for each crime instead of punishment.

Who is talking about forum funds? I was trying to earn money for myself by representing wrongfully tagged people.

[jackg]

Who is talking about forum funds? I was trying to earn money for myself by representing wrongfully tagged people.

So to be wrongfully tagged by you, someone needs to pay you 0.01BTC? Otherwise it's a rightful tag.

Why would someone pay that if the user giving the trust is someone who wants to earn money from the trust system and also has negative trust from a DT member?

[digaran]

Who is talking about forum funds? I was trying to earn money for myself by representing wrongfully tagged people.

So to be wrongfully tagged by you, someone needs to pay you 0.01BTC? Otherwise it's a rightful tag.

Why would someone pay that if the user giving the trust is someone who wants to earn money from the trust system and also has negative trust from a DT member?

I don't want to earn money by removing the tags I have left on people, I want to earn money by representing wrongfully tagged people, I want to earn money by spending my time.

@theymos, DT members are using their power to harass me. please do something, because I don't know anybody else with the power to stop them from doing this.

Ignore this OP, I don't want immunity now, I want justice, they are using their power to damage my reputation freely without anyone stopping them. trust should be to identify scammers, not to use as a tool to harass people.

[JayJuanGee]

Who is talking about forum funds? I was trying to earn money for myself by representing wrongfully tagged people.

So to be wrongfully tagged by you, someone needs to pay you 0.01BTC? Otherwise it's a rightful tag.

Why would someone pay that if the user giving the trust is someone who wants to earn money from the trust system and also has negative trust from a DT member?

I don't want to earn money by removing the tags I have left on people, I want to earn money by representing wrongfully tagged people, I want to earn money by spending my time.

@theymos, DT members are using their power to harass me. please do something, because I don't know anybody else with the power to stop them from doing this.

Ignore this OP, I don't want immunity now, I want justice, they are using their power to damage my reputation freely without anyone stopping them. trust should be to identify scammers, not to use as a tool to harass people.

You seem to be causing your own issues and drama by attempting to defend your own posting and advertising actions and even the contradictory defensive posts that you make and further, to make matters possibly worse, to offer a service that is truly controversial at best and comes off as scammy even if there were some chance that your intentions were initially good.