WSJ hits on the typical layman issues, what the masses want 4 adoption

[jubalix]

Ok so just read the WSJ on Quark
http://online.wsj.com/article/HUG1747585.html?dsk=y

The article can only be written because in a way it is a criticism on BTC

They repeatedly hit on

Faster confirms

But fail to mention this is traded for security, but people just want to hear "faster"

More units, so easy to understand to buy 1 not fractional implied, can the BTC community just go to satoshi already and we can clean the board and bring up adoption over night....its a news story as well. By the time we finish arguing about uBit, its already to expensive, people need to feel they are getting more than 1 whole thing for their $1

finally
http://bitcoinity.org/markets
is formally going to at least mbits



CPU mining so anyone can do it....no mention of bot nets

Can some one write to WSJ and put them right on these 2


more secure 9 rounds of hashing....I don't know if this is true or not to improve security, does it? does it defeat a theoretical quantum attack???


I think qrk maybe good or maybe a flash in the pan, but they have got somethings right, also bill still apears to be milking his followers after bashing crypto's for so long and realizing he was wrong

[crazyfingers]

That's not an article. It's a paid press release written by a QRK pumper. It even says at the bottom "The Wall Street Journal news department was not involved in the creation of this content."

[oakpacific]

Some Russian botnets with millions of CPUs can esaily take them down.

[nimda]

Faster confirms my ass. BitPay doesn't need any confirmations for good transactions.

[knight22]

98% premine coins. Obvious pump and dump.