Bitcoin Forum
May 24, 2024, 10:50:00 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Elizabeth Warren threatens companies she suspects of funding public criticism of  (Read 765 times)
Wilikon (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001


minds.com/Wilikon


View Profile
December 07, 2013, 12:36:38 AM
 #1

...her



http://washingtonexaminer.com/elizabeth-warren-threatens-companies-she-suspects-of-funding-public-criticism-of-her/article/2540207


I’m generally for more disclosure in campaign finance, but the best argument against requiring full disclosure by groups engaged in political speech is that politicians sometimes retaliate against their critics. Sen. Elizabeth Warren inadvertently made that very argument this week.

As told by Ben White at Politico, a group called “Third Way” criticized Warren. Warren apparently suspected that Third Way’s criticism of her was funded by banks. So she wrote a letter to bank CEOs demanding they disclose which political groups they’re funding.

Warren sits on the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. She’s basically telling the entities whose livelihood her committee controls to stop criticizing her. This is bullying — and it’s the best argument for allowing companies and individuals to anonymously criticize politicians.
Hawker
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 1001



View Profile
December 10, 2013, 10:11:03 PM
 #2

...her



http://washingtonexaminer.com/elizabeth-warren-threatens-companies-she-suspects-of-funding-public-criticism-of-her/article/2540207


I’m generally for more disclosure in campaign finance, but the best argument against requiring full disclosure by groups engaged in political speech is that politicians sometimes retaliate against their critics. Sen. Elizabeth Warren inadvertently made that very argument this week.

As told by Ben White at Politico, a group called “Third Way” criticized Warren. Warren apparently suspected that Third Way’s criticism of her was funded by banks. So she wrote a letter to bank CEOs demanding they disclose which political groups they’re funding.

Warren sits on the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. She’s basically telling the entities whose livelihood her committee controls to stop criticizing her. This is bullying — and it’s the best argument for allowing companies and individuals to anonymously criticize politicians.

Really?  Financiers have a deal called the "carried interest rule" that means their shareholders pay a very low tax rate.  Effectively it means that ordinary Americans subsidise the lifestyle of the financiers.  The kind of special deal is typical of what economists call rent seeking behaviour.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carried_interest

The Third Way was set up by the finance industry and and it advocates cuts to Social Security to pay for it's subsidies. 

Surely its not bullying to ask the people who set up The Third Way to come clean?
u9y42
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2562
Merit: 1071


View Profile
December 13, 2013, 03:03:42 PM
 #3

Elizabeth Warren for president in 2016...  Grin but really, she seems to be one of the best politicians you guys have (though that's probably not a very high bar to pass).
Wilikon (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001


minds.com/Wilikon


View Profile
February 17, 2016, 08:46:20 PM
 #4




 
Elizabeth Warren’s CFPB slammed by Native American leaders over racial bias







Sometimes the irony meter just shoots straight past the red line and fractures the glass.

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has been making headlines pretty much since its inception, frequently for all the wrong reasons. The brainchild of Senator Elizabeth Warren, the agency was supposed to be looking out for the little guy, stopping the fat cats from abusing the poor and powerless, and generally leveling the playing field. But one group of frequently impoverished and underrepresented people seems to think that guardians are acting pretty much as poorly as the power brokers they were assigned to monitor.

Sherry Treppa is the councilwoman for the Indian Nation, Habematolel Pomo of Upper Lake in California and she recently had a bone to pick with the CFPB. The Bureau is looking at new payday loan regulations which she claims will undermine a key portion of the tribe’s business without taking into consideration the consumer protections they already have in place. (Law 360, subscription required for full article.)

    A Native American tribal leader assailed the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau on Thursday for its proposed regulation of so-called payday lenders, saying the agency has failed to consult with tribes as it prepares to issue a new federal rule on the industry.

    During a hearing of the Financial Institutions and Consumer Credit Subcommittee of the House Financial Services Committee, Habematolel Pomo of Upper Lake Chairwoman Sherry Treppa said the CFPB’s expected new rule on short-term, small-dollar lending may disregard many tribes’ strict frameworks for regulating their lending businesses and protecting consumers.

    “I remain concerned that the CFPB is developing its proposed action in a vacuum without consulting with tribes to learn about the innumerable tools that we have developed to ensure that we conduct business in a manner that is fair, responsible, compliant and benefits our tribal members and the American consumer,” Treppa said at the hearing.

    Treppa said that her tribe had transformed its economy and governmental services through its online short-term lending business — progress the CFPB’s rule could undermine, she said.

    “The CFPB’s refusal to work with tribes in a government-to-government manner is not consistent with the federal government’s trust responsibility to tribal governments, nor does it respect the inherent sovereignty of Indian tribes,” Treppa said.

I’ll start out here by saying that most of these payday lenders, in my opinion, are engaged in usury of the worst sort and tend to prey on uninformed people facing financial hardship, often to their detriment. Perhaps this Indian nation is different, though. We don’t have enough details to say. But the fact that they are generally entitled to be dealt with on a government to government basis out of respect for their First Nation status (or the US equivalent thereof) complicates the question considerably. When you mix in the CFPB founder’s own struggles with “self-identifying” as a Native American herself, the conflict turns into comedy gold.

But this isn’t the first time that the Bureau has run into problems over discrimination. Last summer their own civil rights officer came forward and said their their internal practices made a mockery of equal rights protection. (American Banker)

    A senior civil rights official at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is poised to tell Congress Thursday that the agency is mishandling internal employee complaints of discrimination and has repeatedly retaliated against staff who spoke out.

    Florine Williams, a senior equal employment specialist at the CFPB’s Office of Civil Rights, is scheduled to testify before the House Financial Services oversight and investigations subcommittee as one of two “whistleblowers” lawmakers have called to probe accusations of discrimination at the agency.

The agency also had vast cost overruns when building their headquarters when they were first approved, further making a joke of the idea of consumer financial protection, since you’d think that the taxpayers would be the largest group of people in need of some help guarding against the abuse of their money. This is one group that’s looking more and more like The Weed Agency every year, but now that they’ve been summoned into existence, they are here forever it seems.



http://hotair.com/archives/2016/02/17/elizabeth-warrens-cfpb-slammed-by-native-american-leaders-over-racial-bias/



salinizm
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 252



View Profile
February 18, 2016, 04:58:26 PM
 #5

Elizabeth Warren for president in 2016...  Grin but really, she seems to be one of the best politicians you guys have (though that's probably not a very high bar to pass).

i totally agree with you... elizabeth warren is the best..

▄█▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀█▄
▄█▀▄███████████▄▀█▄
▄█▀▄███████████████▄▀█▄
▄█▀▄███████ ██ ████████▄▀█▄
█ ███████▄▄ ▌ ▄▄▄ ▀██████ █
█ █████████ ▌ ████ ██████ █
█ █████████ ▌ ▄▄▄▄ ▀█████ █
█ █████████ ▌ █████ █████ █
█ █████▄▀▀  ▌ ▀▀▀▀ ▄█████ █
▀█▄▀███████ ██ ████████▀▄█▀
▀█▄▀███████████████▀▄█▀
▀█▄▀███████████▀▄█▀
▀█▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█▀
JINBI

merges gold’s investment
holding value
with
blockchain technology
[
T H E   G O L D E N   I C O
.
────────     WHITEPAPER     ────────
]
▄█▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀█▄
▄█▀▄███████████▄▀█▄
▄█▀▄███████████████▄▀█▄
▄█▀▄███████ ██ ████████▄▀█▄
█ ███████▄▄ ▌ ▄▄▄ ▀██████ █
█ █████████ ▌ ████ ██████ █
█ █████████ ▌ ▄▄▄▄ ▀█████ █
█ █████████ ▌ █████ █████ █
█ █████▄▀▀  ▌ ▀▀▀▀ ▄█████ █
▀█▄▀███████ ██ ████████▀▄█▀
▀█▄▀███████████████▀▄█▀
▀█▄▀███████████▀▄█▀
▀█▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█▀
Wilikon (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001


minds.com/Wilikon


View Profile
February 18, 2016, 05:06:23 PM
 #6

Elizabeth Warren for president in 2016...  Grin but really, she seems to be one of the best politicians you guys have (though that's probably not a very high bar to pass).

i totally agree with you... elizabeth warren is the best..

... Fake indian?


hugoworld
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 672
Merit: 251



View Profile
February 18, 2016, 05:44:18 PM
 #7

Elizabeth Warren for president in 2016...  Grin but really, she seems to be one of the best politicians you guys have (though that's probably not a very high bar to pass).

i totally agree with you... elizabeth warren is the best..

are you insane ? she is the fake indian and the worst.. you should be out of your mind..

 
EMP
 



▬▬▬▬ ◥ ◤ ▬▬▬▬▬ ◥ ◤ ▬▬▬▬▬ ◥ ◤ ▬▬▬▬▬ ◥ ◤ ▬▬▬▬
 



  ICO START:
10 SEPT 2018
Wilikon (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001


minds.com/Wilikon


View Profile
February 18, 2016, 06:08:19 PM
 #8

Elizabeth Warren for president in 2016...  Grin but really, she seems to be one of the best politicians you guys have (though that's probably not a very high bar to pass).

i totally agree with you... elizabeth warren is the best..

are you insane ? she is the fake indian and the worst.. you should be out of your mind..



Funny how she is still a good fake indian for some here, even after being pushed back by real natives...


Elizabeth Warren’s CFPB slammed by Native American leaders over racial bias

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=360546.msg13919360#msg13919360



Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!