Bitcoin Forum
April 27, 2024, 11:56:37 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Bitcoin should not be seen as a currency, warns Ernst & Young  (Read 2983 times)
Mylon
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 100

Mining FTW


View Profile
December 13, 2013, 02:26:22 AM
 #21

I have read lotsa articles on BTC lately. I have noticed most of them are overlooking one important fact about BTC when considering to name it a currency and see its real possibilities. The fact it can be divided - 0.001, 0.000001, 0.00000000000001 or whatever. There is practically no limitation.

I think this is essential for wider acceptance too. People are used to think in scales of 1$, 1EUR,...when it comes to currency and now 1 BTC. But this is wrong. There will be only 21mil of BTCs (actually less as some coins will be lost forever), but number of BTC users will be probably in hundreds of millions. There will be definitelly need to find apropriate name for smaller BTC unit for masses to use - something pretty catchy  Smiley

The limit is actually 8 decimal places, but I get your point  Smiley
Easy to change that.
Yup and the best part, nobody minds as their money will still be worth the same Smiley (rather than adding money and making everyones money worth less)

"All Your Base Are Belong To Us" by CATS
"This isn't the kind of software where we can leave so many unresolved bugs that we need a tracker for them." -- Satoshi
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714262197
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714262197

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714262197
Reply with quote  #2

1714262197
Report to moderator
empoweoqwj
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500


View Profile
December 13, 2013, 03:10:04 AM
 #22

I have read lotsa articles on BTC lately. I have noticed most of them are overlooking one important fact about BTC when considering to name it a currency and see its real possibilities. The fact it can be divided - 0.001, 0.000001, 0.00000000000001 or whatever. There is practically no limitation.

I think this is essential for wider acceptance too. People are used to think in scales of 1$, 1EUR,...when it comes to currency and now 1 BTC. But this is wrong. There will be only 21mil of BTCs (actually less as some coins will be lost forever), but number of BTC users will be probably in hundreds of millions. There will be definitelly need to find apropriate name for smaller BTC unit for masses to use - something pretty catchy  Smiley

The limit is actually 8 decimal places, but I get your point  Smiley
Easy to change that if need be.

Yes its possible to change that. Easy to code the changes? No. I certainly wouldn't say "practically no limitation" - I wouldn't like to code beyond 64-bit integers.
Coin_Master
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 148
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 17, 2013, 11:32:32 AM
Last edit: January 23, 2014, 08:16:31 AM by Coin_Master
 #23

Out of all the journalists, technology specialists, financial firms and commentators, when is one of them going to say something genuinely enlightening about cryptocurrency? Surely someone can come up with something original, something that's not some shallow, impressionistic "it'll never work" attempt that is refuted by theory as well as (now frequent and numerous) practice?

They all seem to get stuck right at the very beginnings of getting to grips with the most basic aspects of the concept. I mean, does this guy really understand any of the issues around why 6 confirms is considered a standard for faith in transaction irreversibility?

The people who make commentary that implies they really do understand at least something about the underlying technology are almost exclusively those that admire it. The rest seem to come from the one-finger typist, "ring the Computer Repair guys to get the printer working" kind of crowd. Are they just afraid of being the last of the technically inept dinosaurs?
Brilliantly said.  Love the "one-finger typist" remark.  I found your post quite refreshing to read and I have to agree there appears to be a complete lack of understanding or willingness on the part of the said "journalists, technology specialists, financial firms and commentators" to accurately report the changes cryptocurrencies are bringing to the world.  Having said that, behind the scenes there are powerful established figures making preparations for the roll-out of their own cryptocurrency.  Time will tell if they can challenge Bitcoin for the number 1 spot.
jongameson
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 10


View Profile
December 17, 2013, 03:29:37 PM
 #24

this article is correct.  what we need is a Paypal type system that will accept credit cards, and allow people to pay each with bitcoins, and convert it back to fiat after transferring
empoweoqwj
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500


View Profile
December 17, 2013, 04:47:30 PM
 #25

this article is correct.  what we need is a Paypal type system that will accept credit cards, and allow people to pay each with bitcoins, and convert it back to fiat after transferring

I think thats called paypal .... except paypal will never allow bitcoins to be used to fund accounts IMHO.
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!