System of nMerit

[bitmover]

This is new system of bitcointalk? Have any announcement about this?

No, he is just suggesting again something that was already suggested a thousand times and is not a good idea for several reasons...

[1715189667]

1715189667

[1715189667]

1715189667

[1715189667]

1715189667

[actmyname]

This is new system of bitcointalk? Have any announcement about this?

This has not been implemented and most definitely will not be implemented. Negative merit/demerits/anti-merit/fuckoffrit is detrimental to the already-abused system. Just as theymos said, let the merit abuse just be a rounding issue and it'll slowly die out. No need for anything more.

[LogitechMouse]

I think both of them are good to invest. Eth and bth will get a great profit on long hold.

I'm reading this negative merit topic and suddenly makes me laugh with this post  . I'm sorry but I can't stop myself from laughing. hahahahaha. Newbie posting some irrelevant posts in order to gain some post counts. One more, can you say what is the BTH??



P:S. I can't stop laughing now for around a minute or two because of this shitpost. Thank for making me laugh 

[Kim Ji Won]

-snip-

You are missing the point of @actmyname. Many members can take the nMerit personally to other users and target users who they want to give those nMerits to.

Also, with current workload of moderators, they are busy as it is and adding more workload for them like reviewing the nMertis received by a specific member is not necessary.

[CashMercenary]

That recommendation looks fair to me. It would be nice to have this nMerit to get rid of high ranks who are only spamming the forum and abusing the Merit system. I hope that the moderators will be hooked with this idea. If there is a ranking up system with the help of Merits, there should also have a rank downgrade because of their behavior.

[coin5haker]

This is new system of bitcointalk? Have any announcement about this?

Yes, it has been implemented. You should make a thread about it asking how to avoid nMerits  But you will certainly get a bag full of it for creating another nMerit thread without reading FAQ first. 

Did you read this from the beginning?

[nakamura12]

There's no need for nMerit, imo. That's the same thing with facebooks Like system, if you don't like it, then don't like it. So if the post is bad and doesn't deserve merit, then don't merit. But if it;s a spam then report it.

If nMerit is implemented on bitcointalk there will be a topic created base on nMerit. 1.) How to avoid getting nMerit? 2.) What is nMerit? 3.) What is the purpose of nMerit? And other topics also base on nMerit that will flood the bitcointalk's meta section.

That's the same thing with facebooks Like system, if you don't like it, then don't like it.

I agree with this one. Very simple and yet with common sense. Why bother creating a system about nMerit? If there are shitpost/spam post there is no need to give nMerit and just leave it there and let the people decide if it is meritable or not.

[RAMSHIVDEEPAK]

This is new system of bitcointalk? Have any announcement about this?

There is no system nMerit and it is a suggestion  of thread creator,that is useless.

[RAMSHIVDEEPAK]

I wish I could give negative merit.

This message made me think about the fact that in addition to the current system of sMerit, there was also a system of negative merit.

What is nMerit?
If we do not go into more details, this is a system of lowering the Merit to one or another person for multiple violations, something like -Trust, but having significant differences, which I will discuss below.

Features of nMerit
1. Send it will be able to only people with the rank Hero and Legendary
2. After sending the nMerit, he will be sent for moderation.
3. The only exception, in which sending to the moderation is not required - is the simultaneous sending of 5 nMerits to 1 post.
4. After he passes the moderation, the amount of Merit in a person, to whom he was sent, will decrease by an amount equal to the amount nMerit
5. The disappeared Merit will be altered into a sMerit for the person who sent them.

You will say: "But there will be people who are specially grouped in order to take away a measure from a certain person" and you will be right, that's why the amount of merit will depend on:
1. For the help of a moderator or administrator - from 1 to 5 nMerit
2. For the creation of 10 posts, which collected 5 Merits - 5nMerit
3. For every 100 collected Merits - 10nMerits

The system requires considerable improvement, but I tried to convey to you the idea of how this can be realized. It will be interesting to discuss this below

I dont think,there is any need of nMerit,If you don't like the post,you have 2 option either ignore that post or report to the moderator.Current system of merit is enough to encourage the member to write quality post.

[athanz88]

@RAMSHIVDEEPAK Please man, you are already a jr.member with enough activity to be one of member, why the h you still make 2 posts in a row when the post can be combined? And you made it in 40 seconds gap.

[Flash Cunt]

I think both of them are good to invest. Eth and bth will get a great profit on long hold.

Make me a source for nmerits, and I'll sort out stupid pricks like this. He can't even program his bot correctly.

[Harlot]

Even theymos think that having demerit system this early on applied to the merit system is not yet necessary. Also your kind of demerit system is different from what we are thinking, decreasing the overall merit is enough but having them be reported to moderators is a bit excessive to me. And I don't think that all Hero+ should have the right to give demerit, you can't imagine how others can abuse and bring down a person with this kind of system, mostly people with high ranking alts might use this to make a person's merit be 0.

[Flash Cunt]

@RAMSHIVDEEPAK Please man, you are already a jr.member with enough activity to be one of member, why the h you still make 2 posts in a row when the post can be combined? And you made it in 40 seconds gap.

He hasn't put 'edit' through the Google translator, so he isn't sure what it means.

[JohnJarvis99]

There's no need for nMerit, imo. That's the same thing with facebooks Like system, if you don't like it, then don't like it. So if the post is bad and doesn't deserve merit, then don't merit. But if it;s a spam then report it.

I agree with you. Don't make the system have more complicated.

[aksen]

I like the way you gave it a cool name unlike other who call it negative merits. However, it is not required because:

1) The power to punish should be on responsible hands only. Giving it to everyone will cause a lot of problems.

2) Some will start taking personal revenge.

3) It is already hard to rank up, we do not need it to be more difficult.

4) More work for moderators.

5) We should make rules simple.

6) It will cause a lot of problems in signature campaigns that require some earned merits.

7) Some may threat negative action and demand money for it.