Bitcoin Forum
June 25, 2024, 09:58:09 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 [3]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: What's wrong with unequal wealth distribution? (Was: 2013-12-10 Bitcoin Proves..  (Read 2955 times)
Ekaros
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728
Merit: 500



View Profile
December 22, 2013, 02:07:33 PM
 #41

If wealth distribution were equalized, it would sink to a lower common denominator because once people rely on a set income their drive for wealth is extremely diminished and they don't work as hard, then eventually people starve... but hey it would be equal, so that's... good?

If no one works, then who will grow the food crops? Who will patrol your town? Who will look after the public transportation and other facilities? It is bound to fail.

Why would anyone stop working? Cheesy

Wealth distribution is just a data or a property of a system. I think most people are not speaking about giving everyone the same amount of money (it will never happen), but a shift from a greed oriented world to a cooperation and common good oriented world.

binary people are amusing.

If everyone gets more to reasonable point everyone ends up with more, at least the vast majority that is 99% to 99.9%.

As I said it's not zero-sum game. In the end some people earn more, but everyone earning more means that majority spends more and spending means more money earned and better quality of live for everyone.

12pA5nZB5AoXZaaEeoxh5bNqUGXwUUp3Uv
http://firstbits.com/1qdiz
Feel free to help poor student!
capoeira
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2413
Merit: 1003



View Profile
December 22, 2013, 02:43:14 PM
 #42


binary people are amusing.

they are not worth discussion, they wont open their mind

player01
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 250



View Profile
December 22, 2013, 03:39:22 PM
 #43

If wealth distribution were equalized, it would sink to a lower common denominator because once people rely on a set income their drive for wealth is extremely diminished and they don't work as hard, then eventually people starve... but hey it would be equal, so that's... good?

If no one works, then who will grow the food crops? Who will patrol your town? Who will look after the public transportation and other facilities? It is bound to fail.

Why would anyone stop working? Cheesy

Wealth distribution is just a data or a property of a system. I think most people are not speaking about giving everyone the same amount of money (it will never happen), but a shift from a greed oriented world to a cooperation and common good oriented world.

binary people are amusing.

Why would people stop working?

Take the US for a case study, those who have unemployment tend to only actually get a job right before it runs out. Why WOULD they start working is the real question. In order to evenly distribute the wealth, you would have to make allowances for low-skill workers or people who are unemployable because of either their attitude, intelligence or physical ability, if that were the case, those who do not have a very big drive to make something of their own (which is most people) would simply try to find a way to take some of this easy money. Once they do, they take it because they can, and often work under-the-table to make up the difference between what they get handed and what they want.

The alternative is scary.

If you want to distribute wealth and won't take excuses, you must literally enslave the populace and put them to work on your terms (or the terms of whomever is in power) they would then be coerced to farm or do factory work (this is what happened in Russia during communism to a certain degree) and while they had some triumphs, the general effect was massive poverty, a large black market, corruption in high degree and the wealth being distributed mainly in the government and police.

In short, you CAN'T distribute wealth evenly by force, and when you even attempt it, the outcomes are so bad and history is so replete with examples, you must be a madman, evil or simply too stupid to understand history to attempt it.
Hideyoshi
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10


View Profile
December 22, 2013, 09:15:11 PM
 #44

shift from a greed oriented world to a cooperation and common good oriented world.

binary people are amusing.

Greed v.s. Cooperation. Are you saying you are amusing?
Why can't greed have cooperation? It could be many people cooperating to make lots of money. Like in large companies.
Rassah
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1680
Merit: 1035



View Profile WWW
December 23, 2013, 05:38:55 AM
 #45


binary people are amusing.

they are not worth discussion, they wont open their mind

We could say the same about you, including your binary thinking.
Spendulus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2898
Merit: 1386



View Profile
December 23, 2013, 04:17:47 PM
 #46

....

So it's just question of how to get the money in hands of majority...
Well this is easy.

You just create a huge organization and arm it, pointy guns and steely knives, then tell them to go out and take things away.  After you take a lot of stuff away from people they are all equal, having nothing or the few things that it wasn't worth hauling off.
Pages: « 1 2 [3]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!