moleculecoin (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
Love all coins!
|
|
December 15, 2013, 07:03:05 AM |
|
Let's let Molecule continue on as it stands so folks don't have to pull a new client and have yet more confusion. The difficulty is rising but I think this can go somewhere. I will get Atom going to support the giveaway.
|
Molecule MOL Developer Donation Address: K3LhXmZeougH7XUr1ppkKd15A53o6iBgmJ
|
|
|
led_lcd
|
|
December 15, 2013, 07:05:51 AM |
|
Yes, I agree. What is currently running for molecule, let it run it's course. The market is obviously going to determine what happens.
Would it be a fair statement that since the difficulty ran away so quickly and with no premine on the fork that it's about as 'fair' as it could get for a launch?
|
|
|
|
srilhblsfjhnlsfk
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
|
|
December 15, 2013, 07:12:17 AM |
|
It's almost impressive how many failures this coin managed to accrue in less than 24 hours...
Yeah. It wasn't super smooth, but the author responded to criticism and fixed the problems. Its on block 1131, it was originally premined to 14k but they were deleted. I'm confused: if the pre-mines were deleted, how is the author giving away 1,000,000 coins in another thread? Aren't we on a completely different blockchain now? Yeah, I don't believe the author ever intended for the new shorter block chain to fork. The giveaway thread is for coins from the old blockchain so I'm assuming the "fixes" were really just an accident. This is pretty much a trainwreck all around. That is correct. I was not expecting the blockchain to fork, and the giveaway is for coins from the old chain. I'm unsure of what to do because I also tend to agree with Snard. My intention with the premine was not to hoard a bunch of coins, it was to be able to run promotions and pay someone to put up a block explorer. That said, I had only premined 5M coins, somebody else got the other 6M... So, I'm thinking we should continue on with the new fork as an experiment and see where it leads... What do you all think? "tinybike" mentioned this in the giveaway thread and I liked it... I think you should leave the current "fork" that's at like block 1440 as an experiment. tinybike suggested renaming it "Atom" which I kinda like. Then I would relaunch "Molecule" again in a more ordered fashion; I personally question whether the original fork would be recoverable. You can use the give-away thread to build some momentum for the re-launch. I like this idea and its a solution that will work. Sounds good. Create an "Atom" experimental altcoin as well as a new "MoleculeCoin" so we can start fresh. Very cool... the difficulty is at 77 already Logo idea for "Atom"; I did this in 12 seconds in paint. I can make a better one tomorrow or somebody else can... https://i.imgur.com/XMyyvfL.png
|
|
|
|
tangle
|
|
December 15, 2013, 07:15:26 AM |
|
Getting back to that giveaway. I'm sure people posting wallets from both forks. That could be a problem. And how one can join old fork? Only by having old data.
|
|
|
|
nate008
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
December 15, 2013, 07:16:28 AM |
|
A 0-premine launch is worth more than any giveaway. People will donate if you need it and just giveaway less since the coin will be worth more.
Yeah , but the scheme has failed. 11 million coins where supposed to get somebody rich. Try with another clone , maybe you'll get it right this time.
|
|
|
|
Dr.What
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
December 15, 2013, 07:16:37 AM |
|
"difficulty" : 102.58063333,
|
|
|
|
wakasaki808
|
|
December 15, 2013, 07:17:18 AM |
|
Need a pool already....
|
|
|
|
tangle
|
|
December 15, 2013, 07:18:22 AM |
|
Is everyones wallet showing out of sync?
|
|
|
|
Galimore
|
|
December 15, 2013, 07:21:06 AM |
|
"difficulty" : 102.58063333, Yeah, this got raped pretty quick by cloud miners and people GPU mining on Smelter.
|
|
|
|
jerrybusey
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
December 15, 2013, 07:26:12 AM |
|
I'm going to build a solid portfolio based on this and Dogecoin. Watch me get rich!
|
BTC love: 13pBauoSCJBF5Vdb1AuMYg1kDvrKzNSthU
|
|
|
BitRaistlin
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 55
Merit: 0
|
|
December 15, 2013, 07:32:22 AM |
|
PLease help. I have sync my molecule wallet and placed the example molecule.conf of first thread's page. I'm trying mine with the miner I use to Quark with this settings but dont work: minerd -a quark -o http://127.0.0.1:11875 -u XXX -p xxx minerd says: HTTP request failed: failed to connect to http://127.0.0.1:11875 I'm running it from a Vmware machine, maybe my direction is not http://127.0.0.1:11875?
|
|
|
|
r47351
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
December 15, 2013, 07:42:34 AM |
|
PLease help. I have sync my molecule wallet and placed the example molecule.conf of first thread's page. I'm trying mine with the miner I use to Quark with this settings but dont work: minerd -a quark -o http://127.0.0.1:11875 -u XXX -p xxx minerd says: HTTP request failed: failed to connect to http://127.0.0.1:11875 I'm running it from a Vmware machine, maybe my direction is not http://127.0.0.1:11875?Try localhost
|
|
|
|
BitRaistlin
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 55
Merit: 0
|
|
December 15, 2013, 07:46:30 AM |
|
PLease help. I have sync my molecule wallet and placed the example molecule.conf of first thread's page. I'm trying mine with the miner I use to Quark with this settings but dont work: minerd -a quark -o http://127.0.0.1:11875 -u XXX -p xxx minerd says: HTTP request failed: failed to connect to http://127.0.0.1:11875 I'm running it from a Vmware machine, maybe my direction is not http://127.0.0.1:11875?Try localhost Not work… I have execute ipconfig and put the direction that appears in Direction IPv4 but not work
|
|
|
|
innovation
|
|
December 15, 2013, 07:48:46 AM |
|
PLease help. I have sync my molecule wallet and placed the example molecule.conf of first thread's page. I'm trying mine with the miner I use to Quark with this settings but dont work: minerd -a quark -o http://127.0.0.1:11875 -u XXX -p xxx minerd says: HTTP request failed: failed to connect to http://127.0.0.1:11875 I'm running it from a Vmware machine, maybe my direction is not http://127.0.0.1:11875?listen=1 rpcallowip=127.0.0.1 rpcuser=innovation rpcpassword=x rpcport=11875 server=1 this is my molecule.conf.
|
|
|
|
tangle
|
|
December 15, 2013, 07:53:43 AM |
|
It doesn't matter whether it VMware or not if you're running both minerd and wallet on your VMware machine. Turn off your firewall, may be it's blocking. Below is my config that works fine. I'm using custom port, but you can change it. And this is how I run miner: minerd.exe -a quark -o localhost:18666 -u tangle -p 1 -t 4 rpcuser=tangle rpcpassword=1 rpcport=18666 port=18667 testnet=0 listen=1 daemon=1 server=1 gen=0
You can also try adding to config rpcallowip=*
|
|
|
|
BitRaistlin
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 55
Merit: 0
|
|
December 15, 2013, 07:54:19 AM |
|
molecule.conf should be in the folder where is molecule-qt no?
|
|
|
|
wakasaki808
|
|
December 15, 2013, 07:55:38 AM |
|
molecule.conf should be in the folder where is molecule-qt no?
no...it should be in the... "C:\Users\Username\AppData\Roaming\Molecule\" folder
|
|
|
|
innovation
|
|
December 15, 2013, 07:56:24 AM |
|
molecule.conf should be in the folder where is molecule-qt no?
molecule.conf should be wallet folder.
|
|
|
|
BitRaistlin
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 55
Merit: 0
|
|
December 15, 2013, 07:58:14 AM |
|
It doesn't matter whether it VMware or not if you're running both minerd and wallet on your VMware machine. Turn off your firewall, may be it's blocking. Below is my config that works fine. I'm using custom port, but you can change it. And this is how I run miner: minerd.exe -a quark -o localhost:18666 -u tangle -p 1 -t 4 rpcuser=tangle rpcpassword=1 rpcport=18666 port=18667 testnet=0 listen=1 daemon=1 server=1 gen=0
You can also try adding to config rpcallowip=*
Try this and nothing. Firewall OFF and now I'm in bootcamp, no Vmware
|
|
|
|
MrCroissant
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
December 15, 2013, 07:59:20 AM |
|
Where to get myuser and password? Where do I register?
|
|
|
|
|