Requesting Feedback [DICE] - Questions/Tips/ideas to make a great DICE guide

A few moments to help shape what can be a little bit of everybody's brainchild...

I have a love for gambling and for the last year or so I have been a dice fanatic. I recently landed an opportunity to write about rolling crypto Dice, and its sort of blossomed into what I hope can one day be the most comprehensive Dice guide available. I dream BIG, and really its exploded in my mind into something that I'm not sure even my employer is going to approve, as I want it to be the #1 and only reference a user might need in order to learn or reference dice, wagering, strategies, odds, a site's user interface, depositing, etc... Maybe there is already one here or out there - I dont know and dont knowvwhere he is planning on publishing. It is ideally something that isn't ever going to be complete, not soon anyhow. He (until or unless he says, For now will be anonymous) suggested 3,000 words or so for the guide and I'm thinking 30,000 won't cover it lol...

Anyways, if it is 3000-5000 words then what HAS to be included? I thought I'd take positive geared feedback and opinions for what the Webster's of Dice would need to be legit. First article is probably "duh brah" basics and basic strategies - like Martingale, Reverse Martingale, etc. But where its exciting (for me at least) is going to be the Dice sites and Casinos reviews. But where to start and how tp determine without being biased or appearring to employ favoritism? Obviously the Top sites need reviewed, but what about the little guys? I'm a kind of "Damn the Man" guy and like little places where Everybody knows your name and all that jazz. But its gotta be fair, balanced, transparent, and have the highest integrity known to mankind, not found anywhere else in our solar system, or even galaxy...

Oooh... Did you get chills? Haha, me neither, but it was kind of funny to pretend to...

I guess if you would, leave your favorite Dice site in a reply (along with any suggestions, ideas, pointers, or gifts to help pay for this lol...) and I'll keep a tally and when I am ready to review the first one here in a few days the top referenced site will get the 1st review? Or maybe I'll draw from a hat the names of each site mentioned and pick randomly.

Suggestions •PLEASE•

Also, when playing each site for a review, I am gonna try and gather as much empirical data as possible by depositing, say .0005 or .001 into each, or probably a USD equivalent of 10$ (unless there is awesome reception and some donation to be able to match, allowing for greater play) and having controlled bets that allow for the improbabilities and probabilities alike to play out and hopefully by doing so, I CAN TAKE OVER THE WORLD!

Naah.... But maybe we could learn something, and if not, maybe I will have a Projekt I will take to my grave perfecting.

Not now, because I have an open loan request and wouldnt want to raise concerns regarding validity or anything, or maybe it doesnt even matter - but I am going to open an address that if anyone wanted to donate to help offset the cost, or increase what I am able to deposit and therefore perhaps allow for more extensive experiences in the research field, that would be pretty amazing to see some support with. Noting the transparency of the Blockchain, we can ensure that only the deposit amount we arrive at being necessary and beneficial for research will ever be withdrawn and then only to test another site and review it. Winnings if any exist, or bits/satoshi's not played when final roll of test rolls is cast, will be withdrawn from that account to the donation account or another address of the same account, and used for education and awareness, and noble and higher-minded non profit ventures.

Sooooo........

Did Iose you? Maybe half of you are still with me, and maybe a couple are riding my vibe.... I look forward to this and am more excited about writing a guide, dare I say a feature, than I've ever been. Help me make it what it NEEDS to be.

Thank You for your time, and may the Odds be ever in your favor.

Matthew 'Kryptotronic' Foster